70 year old guy kills mugger

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Wabbit
Posts: 1384
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2001 8:00 am

70 year old guy kills mugger

Post by Wabbit »

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article ... 43,00.html
An American senior citizen killed an alleged mugger with his bare hands, and his traveling companions aboard a tour bus fended of two other assailants in the Atlantic coast city of Limon, police said.
GG.
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dzjepp »

Dude, I wouldn't fuck with a guy that iced a bear with his bare hands
feedback
Posts: 7449
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 8:00 am

Post by feedback »

Hope the fucker goes to prison :icon7:
horton
Posts: 1080
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2001 7:00 am

Post by horton »

feedback wrote:Hope the fucker goes to prison :icon7:
I'm not sure if you are joking, serious or trolling - but I hope the cunt serves some time.

I'd rather someone take every material possesion of mine, than I take his life.

It sounds like (and im ready to be proven totally wrong) that he subdued the mugger, then decided to take his life.

fuck him in the ass
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

i would hope that you DIDENT Read that artical... because they CLEARLY say... and i quote: "The tourists left on their Carnival cruise ship after the incident and Hernandez said authorities do not plan to press any charges against them. "They were in their right to defend themselves after being held up," he said"

So, No, he will not be charged..
horton
Posts: 1080
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2001 7:00 am

Post by horton »

AmIdYfReAk wrote:
So, No, he will not be charged..
he should have been.

its a little fucked up when people think they can take a life to protect their own property.

he was stealing my car - i shot him
he was on my property - i shot him

a life should be taken when
a. there is no non-fatal action that can be taken
b. there is a clear threat to your own life - if someone mugs you, the safest option is to hand over your shit.
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

w3rd
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

He may have suffocated the mugger in a headlock in the heat of the moment as both were struggling against each other.

Had he already been clearly subdued and retired G.I. Joe went at him to finish the job, then I'd be more inclined to prosecute.
feedback
Posts: 7449
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 8:00 am

Post by feedback »

To kill him, he'd have to keep him in the choke (not a headlock, as the story refers to it) for 3-4 minutes. Past 2 is brain damage.
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

Yeah, and he was probably out of it for a brief period before death. Who knows though, the old fart might have thought the mugger feigned passing out so he could ease up on his hold. People can respond with excessive caution in these situations.
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

horton wrote:It sounds like (and im ready to be proven totally wrong) that he subdued the mugger, then decided to take his life.

fuck him in the ass
I take the stance (and im ready to be proven totally wrong) that he did not knowingly decide to take the guy's life.

don't fuck him in the ass
horton
Posts: 1080
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2001 7:00 am

Post by horton »

Id say fuck him in the ass with a spoon.

If someone is protecting themselves, they punch someone and kill them..its reasonable, they had no realistic way to know there was a chance of killing them.

If someone who has been trained in military hand to hand combat, takes a life, I would say they are likely to know exactly what they were doing, and what the consequences of using such a choke is likely to be.

Im gonna remember this situation next time i see someone smoking a joint, Im going to snap their bones, then choke them past unconciousness and into death. Then because they were commiting a criminal act, I will get away with it.
feedback
Posts: 7449
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 8:00 am

Post by feedback »

feedback wrote:To kill him, he'd have to keep him in the choke (not a headlock, as the story refers to it) for 3-4 minutes. Past 2 is brain damage.
FYI if I'm ever in a life or death situation and get the upper hand like that, I'm not going to kill them. Nope, I'm going to make them retarded. It will make it that much sweeter, as well as defendable.

edit: horton, you strike me as someone with a strong sense of justice, I admire that
horton
Posts: 1080
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2001 7:00 am

Post by horton »

feedback wrote:
edit: horton, you strike me as someone with a strong sense of justice, I admire that
thank you, sir.

I have no problems with someone snapping the arms and legs of someone who is trying to mug them, however I dont believe in the death penalty, I dont think police should shoot unless to save a life, and I'd hate to take a life.

Its hard when emotions are flying, my gf's cousin was murdered a couple of months ago, and my first thoughts were to have someone cut his throat in jail. but when you step back and try to think fairly, rather than with emotions, its never the right thing to take a life.

I didnt support the execution of saddam, so a mugger has the right to live.
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

horton wrote:
feedback wrote:
edit: horton, you strike me as someone with a strong sense of justice, I admire that
thank you, sir.

I have no problems with someone snapping the arms and legs of someone who is trying to mug them, however I dont believe in the death penalty, I dont think police should shoot unless to save a life, and I'd hate to take a life.

Its hard when emotions are flying, my gf's cousin was murdered a couple of months ago, and my first thoughts were to have someone cut his throat in jail. but when you step back and try to think fairly, rather than with emotions, its never the right thing to take a life.

I didnt support the execution of saddam, so a mugger has the right to live.
It's not that I disagree with this particularly, but I just don't think you can always expect dispassionate reasoned response from victims of muggings.

I'm not approving of the old guy's actions, just disinclined to prosecute unless the specifics of the case clearly implicate him in a crime (i.e. something above and beyond self-defense).
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

horton wrote:Im gonna remember this situation next time i see someone smoking a joint, Im going to snap their bones, then choke them past unconciousness and into death. Then because they were commiting a criminal act, I will get away with it.
Why are you bringing up smoking weed? Passively smoking weed without harming anyone else, versus actively putting a gun to someone's head and grabbing their neck (for that account of the story, go here) are, to me, very different types of 'breaking the law'. No one's life is involved in the former, while it is very unclear in the latter.

I agree with you that it is wrong for someone to take the life of another person when the situation is not life threatening. I know absolutely nothing about military hand-to-hand combat, so if you think the guy must have known exactly what he was doing when he killed his assailant... then surely that was the wrong thing to do. But I'm not much of a believer in capital punishment, either, so I don't think I'd go as far as having the old man fucked in the ass with a spoon.
Turing
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:28 am

Post by Turing »

I think that all of the excitement against killing the guy seems a bit dumb. If you're holding someone around the throat hard enough to snap their clavicle, it can't be that hard to crush their windpipe, can it? Especially not when you're in the middle of dealing with the fact that the guy you're pwning has a couple of friends trying to mug your friends.
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

most of limon's a lawless shithole. it's a shame the guy died, but if the old fella saw an opportunity to disarm him without putting the woman in further danger then he was right to take it.

i hope this doesn't mess up tourist relations with costa rica, americans are still quite well-liked over there.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

horton wrote:
AmIdYfReAk wrote:
So, No, he will not be charged..
he should have been.

its a little fucked up when people think they can take a life to protect their own property.

he was stealing my car - i shot him
he was on my property - i shot him

a life should be taken when
a. there is no non-fatal action that can be taken
b. there is a clear threat to your own life - if someone mugs you, the safest option is to hand over your shit.
i agree mostly with your stance on these issues, but i do not know if you mean property as in land or property as in house. if someone was breaking into your house while you were home, would you not do everything to protect your family (or your dogs i guess)? i'm not saying shoot him down (i don't like guns for the most part).
busetibi
Posts: 3178
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2000 8:00 am

Post by busetibi »

oh im sorry mr mugger, sure, here take my wallet and my watch so you can buy some drugs.
fuck that.
scatter his shit to the wind
Gaza's Shirt:
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
Wabbit
Posts: 1384
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Wabbit »

I don't know if he purposely killed the guy or not. If he felt it was a "them or us" situation then I absolutely stand by the guy. In the heat of the moment, you don't know what the guys with weapons are going to do and you're not even in your own country...I can see him accidentally using more force than was necessary. Seems like the authorities didn't think he did it on purpose either.

I was reminded of the young guy that died when passengers on a plane "restrained" him a bit to vigoursly. I don't believe charges were brought in that case either. (Can't find a link to this one)

Here's one incident http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,150972,00.html
Lee, 48, of New York, stood up in his seat on American's Flight 4 from Los Angeles and "loudly demanded another beer," airline spokesman Tim Smith said.
Note to self: Remember not to loudly demand another beverage on an airplane.
Last edited by Wabbit on Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.
hate
Posts: 1846
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 1999 8:00 am

Post by hate »

don't fuck with americans

especially the elders


:olo:
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Post by seremtan »

busetibi wrote:oh im sorry mr mugger, sure, here take my wallet and my watch so you can buy some drugs.
fuck that.
scatter his shit to the wind
for once i agree with you

sometimes the force needed to restrain someone can kill them, which i think is what happened here. besides, if there's no risk premium to mugging, it'll happen more often
bikkeldesnikkel
Posts: 1145
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 7:54 pm

Post by bikkeldesnikkel »

it's not very likely you kill someone when restraining them. the least that should be done is a thorough investigation, but dropping it altogether? that's insane
Wabbit
Posts: 1384
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Wabbit »

bikkeldesnikkel wrote:it's not very likely you kill someone when restraining them.
That's not true at all. It happens all the time.

I posted a link to another case of it (and there's many more if you google it) in my post above this one.
Post Reply