Plant corrects its own mutated DNA

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Plant corrects its own mutated DNA

Post by mjrpes »

http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050321/ ... 321-8.html

Pretty amazing, seeing how it goes against some fundamental notions we've taken for granted for the last century+.
lars63
Posts: 2927
Joined: Mon May 15, 2000 7:00 am

Post by lars63 »

That is a interesting read
Member: [url=http://www.nad.org]NAD[/url]&[url=http://www.bta4bikes.org/]BTA[/url]
Your Friendly Neighborhood Quake Addict
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

that is rather fucking interesting.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

We'll see how it all plays out. But Nature is one of the big journals, with a pretty stringent peer-review process...so there has to be something to it.
S@M
Posts: 1889
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:11 am

Post by S@M »

tnf wrote:We'll see how it all plays out. But Nature is one of the big journals, with a pretty stringent peer-review process...so there has to be something to it.
Stick with your first sentence, the second is fraught with dangerous assumptions....
"Liberty, what crimes are committed in your name."
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

S@M wrote:
tnf wrote:We'll see how it all plays out. But Nature is one of the big journals, with a pretty stringent peer-review process...so there has to be something to it.
Stick with your first sentence, the second is fraught with dangerous assumptions....
That Nature has a pretty stringent peer-review process? I thought that was fact.
S@M
Posts: 1889
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:11 am

Post by S@M »

no, I meant that its a good idea to read with a critical attitude as per his opening sentence, because peer review is not as effective as its assumed to be - regardless of the journal. Still it IS an interesting finding, although from reading, its rather early days. No faulting tnf's logic, really, so wtf did I post for???
"Liberty, what crimes are committed in your name."
werldhed
Posts: 4926
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am

Post by werldhed »

That's pretty interesting, but I'm not really surprised. Genomes have numerous ways of proofreading themselves to eradicate mutations. Also, like they said, there is a lot of DNA that seems unused in the genome, so I'd expect it's there for some reason. It's an interesting find, but I'm willing to bet the cause won't be as weird as the researchers think it is.
Post Reply