The last movie you saw

Post by **Grudge** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:24 pm

lol, yea it seems like no real living woman can compare to the perfect collection of polygons that is Lara Croft

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:04 pm

Captain Mazda wrote: Salma Hayek has a nice body with a dog face.

you lose.

Post by **mac** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:20 pm

Captain Mazda wrote:After The Sunset - 7/10

Pretty much a "meh" movie, some very hilarious parts. Woody Harrelson always plays dumb characters so well. Salma Hayek has a nice body with a dog face.

lol she has no moustach and her lastname is not depp so sure she is not youre type.. :icon27:

as for pans labyrinth.. alot of decent scores so faar.. need to get hold of that movie.

Post by **Captain** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:23 pm

Fuck off nerds

lol whoever edited that is a fag. Admit it.

Post by **mac** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:02 pm

and thats youre hetero alibi?

Post by **Wabbit** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:09 pm

I didn't like Pan's Labryinth. The movie had good acting, writing, filming etc., but the way it was portrayed in the advertisements had nothing to do with the actual story.

Post by **mac** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:16 pm

Wabbit wrote:I didn't like Pan's Labryinth. The movie had good acting, writing, filming etc., but the way it was portrayed in the advertisements had nothing to do with the actual story.

havent seen any ads.. just a short trailer with some fantasy/nazi mix and the good scores in here

Post by **Wabbit** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:20 pm

mac wrote:havent seen any ads.. just a short trailer with some fantasy/nazi mix and the good scores in here

Seems to me this site http://www.panslabyrinth.com/ concentrates more on the fantasy part of the story, which is pretty minor, imo.

Post by **Duhard** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:21 pm

Paris exposed
Paris topless 1
Paris in bed 1
Paris in bed 2
Paris bedbuddy
Paris in the tub 1
Paris in the tub 2
Paris in the tub 3

Post by **Captain** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:09 pm

mac wrote:and thats youre hetero alibi?

it teh englandish :blurb;

Post by **Jackal** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm

Wabbit wrote:I didn't like Pan's Labryinth. The movie had good acting, writing, filming etc., but the way it was portrayed in the advertisements had nothing to do with the actual story.

So you thought all of the elements that make a great film were there but because it wasn't like the commercial you saw while watching whatever miniature painting retard show you watch you didn't like it.

Retard much?

Honestly though even though I peg you as being a fat slob I do think you're relatively smart. However what you just said makes me question that.

Post by **Foo** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:15 pm

Settle down Jackalarse. Having differing opinions from yours isn't grounds for instaflame.

Post by **Wabbit** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:41 pm

Jackal wrote:Honestly though even though I peg you as being a fat slob I do think you're relatively smart. However what you just said makes me question that.

Learn to read assholio. I said good. Not great.

To me it was a bait and switch. The way it was touted, I was thinking more along the lines of This movie or some other fantasy type film.

---------------

[SPOILERS FROM HERE ON]
Not the story of some poor girl's shit life and shittier death. Nothing on this site = Pan = indicates anything other than a fantasy film. To me, the violence was graphic and if I had known it was at that level, I would not have seen the film.

I didn't like it. Period. It's not the type of film I like, no matter how good the cinematography.

Oh, and when I give a shit what you think about me, I'll let you know, douchebag.

Post by **Jackal** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:09 am

Wabbit wrote:
Jackal wrote:Honestly though even though I peg you as being a fat slob I do think you're relatively smart. However what you just said makes me question that.

Learn to read assholio. I said good. Not great.

To me it was a bait and switch. The way it was touted, I was thinking more along the lines of This movie or some other fantasy type film.

---------------

[SPOILERS FROM HERE ON]
Not the story of some poor girl's shit life and shittier death. Nothing on this site = Pan = indicates anything other than a fantasy film. To me, the violence was graphic and if I had known it was at that level, I would not have seen the film.

I didn't like it. Period. It's not the type of film I like, no matter how good the cinematography.

Oh, and when I give a shit what you think about me, I'll let you know, douchebag.

It wasn't a bait and switch at all. You just didn't bother to read anything about it.
And I said "all of the elements of a great film" which has nothing to do with your "good" comments. Lose a little weight on those eyelids and maybe you'll be able to read a bit better.

edit: lol, it has the same word as this other film in the title! THEY MUST BE THE SAME!!!

Post by **Wabbit** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:38 am

Jackal wrote:It wasn't a bait and switch at all. You just didn't bother to read anything about it.
And I said "all of the elements of a great film" which has nothing to do with your "good" comments. Lose a little weight on those eyelids and maybe you'll be able to read a bit better.

edit: lol, it has the same word as this other film in the title! THEY MUST BE THE SAME!!!

As paranoid as you are about fat, I'd bet my bank account you're one fat-ass nerd with a greasy comb-over and bad dandruff. Learn to live with it and not be so hostile, Hastopayforsexal.

No. I absolutely didn't see the similarity in the names and think there would be people stupid enough to believe I thought they were similar for that reason. btw, I looked at the entire site for Pan's. Read every word.

Look at the pics of the two films. The fantasy elements are both dark and medieval/gothic.

Post by **Wabbit** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:47 am

One last thing. The actor that did the movements for the faun was ass. Talk about over-acting. Could he wave his hands around any more? Apparently, in Spain, a faun can't speak unless it waves its hands around like a fag on crack. It was totally unnecessary and distracting.

On a brighter note, I learned the spanish word for echo.

Post by **Jackal** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:28 pm

Wabbit wrote:One last thing. The actor that did the movements for the faun was ass. Talk about over-acting. Could he wave his hands around any more? Apparently, in Spain, a faun can't speak unless it waves its hands around like a fag on crack. It was totally unnecessary and distracting.

On a brighter note, I learned the spanish word for echo.

Actually Doug Jones is one of the most sought after actors in Hollywood for roles such as the two he played (the faun and the pale man). He was also the only american on the film and doesn't speak a lick of Spanish.
He was also Abe Sapien in Hellboy. But then again you don't know what you're talking about.

Anyway, in the interest of no longer derailing the thread.

The Guardian: 3/10

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:47 am

Spaced season 1

9/10

really well written television

thanks Zark for suggesting it

Post by **axbaby** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:15 am

Smoking Aces .. the hype was all wrong .. the movie sucked assages

Post by **R00k** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:31 am

Clerks 2 - 7.5

Post by **LawL** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:46 am

Sexy Beast.

Post by **Turing** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:48 am

I only watched that movie because I was pissed off about Ben Kingsley beating Gandalf for best supporting actor, but Jesus Christ did he ever deserve it.

Post by ek » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:51 am

LawL wrote:Sexy Beast.

i saw that the other day, was going to rent it out.. any good?

Post by **Duhard** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:53 am

Jenna Jameson does Harlem.

Post by **R00k** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:55 am

Watched Thank You for Smoking last night.

It was surprisingly good. 7/10