Virus Scanner Recommendation

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
DiscoDave
Posts: 1645
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:33 pm

Virus Scanner Recommendation

Post by DiscoDave »

Lo all,

My rents currenty have a old system of mine that they use for web surfing, emailing, writing documents etc, pretty much non demanding stuff. Its a K6-2 500mhz, 192mb Ram, TNT2 etc etc.

They currently have the lastest version of Norton Antivirus installed. I've noticed it grinds the system to a halt and the subscription for it has run out, so i've been thinking of putting something a bit better on it.

Im not really up to date with virus scanners, never had to use one for a few years now but because its my parents, probably best for them to have one.

So could you please recommend some good Virus Scanners suitable for this low spec system please?

David
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

DiscoDave
Posts: 1645
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:33 pm

Post by DiscoDave »

How much of a difference is there between the free and paid version? My rents dont mind paying for a subscription
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

never used the pay-version so i couldn't tell you, sorry.
dmmh
Posts: 2501
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dmmh »

ive stopped using a virusscanner a long time ago, they all suck
[i]And shepherds we shall be, for thee my Lord for thee, Power hath descended forth from thy hand, that our feet may swiftly carry out thy command, we shall flow a river forth to thee, and teeming with souls shall it ever be. In nomine patris, et fili, et spiritus sancti.[/i]
SoM
Posts: 8489
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 1999 8:00 am

Post by SoM »

http://www.avast.com/

recommended by Phoenix :icon14:
[color=red][WYD][/color]S[color=red]o[/color]M
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

dmmh wrote:ive stopped using a virusscanner a long time ago, they all suck
Oooh, check out dmmh and his ultra-controversial opinions! :icon28:
Arkleseizure
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 1:06 am

Post by Arkleseizure »

SoM wrote:http://www.avast.com/

recommended by Phoenix :icon14:
Second recommendation made by me. It's the only antivirus I like.

:icon14: :icon14:
Two thumbs up Alwil Software.
bork[e]
Posts: 4357
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 8:00 am

Post by bork[e] »

I've had some great luck with BitDefender...grab it over in the T&T link to check it out...free and updates on auto daily. Really nice product :up:
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

I also heard Bitdefender is really good.

/I use (free) AVGuard though, because... it's free.
Arkleseizure
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 1:06 am

Post by Arkleseizure »

AVG sucks.
rep
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by rep »

Care to elaborate?

My experience is Norton and McAfee are so bloated they both take 40-60MB of RAM just to operate.

Quake 3 uses what, 56 as default? Fuck those programs. AVG seems to work fine.

The best defense is using Opera and surfing with a little brains.
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Arkleseizure wrote:AVG sucks.
the updater (kinda) sucks, on-demand detection is quite good, on-access detection indeed sucks AFAIK.
dmmh
Posts: 2501
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dmmh »

SplishSplash wrote:
dmmh wrote:ive stopped using a virusscanner a long time ago, they all suck
Oooh, check out dmmh and his ultra-controversial opinions! :icon28:
got a problem with that?
want some?
[i]And shepherds we shall be, for thee my Lord for thee, Power hath descended forth from thy hand, that our feet may swiftly carry out thy command, we shall flow a river forth to thee, and teeming with souls shall it ever be. In nomine patris, et fili, et spiritus sancti.[/i]
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Yeah I got a problem.
Yeah I want some.
lars63
Posts: 2927
Joined: Mon May 15, 2000 7:00 am

Post by lars63 »

AVG seems to work good for me too. No problems as of yet
Member: [url=http://www.nad.org]NAD[/url]&[url=http://www.bta4bikes.org/]BTA[/url]
Your Friendly Neighborhood Quake Addict
Bdw3
Posts: 3348
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Bdw3 »

Another nice free one:
AntiVir.... http://www.free-av.com/

Online Scanners:
Panda:
http://www.pandasoftware.com/activescan/

Trend Macro:
http://housecall.trendmicro.com/
Kills On Site
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Kills On Site »

I have Norton Systemworks, as far as virus scanning it does great, I love Systemworks for the other apps besides AV it comes with
[size=92][color=#0000FF]Hugh Hefner for President[/color][/size]
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Bdw3 wrote:Another nice free one:
AntiVir.... http://www.free-av.com/
That's the one I was talking about...? :paranoid:
Dr_Watson
Posts: 5237
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dr_Watson »

dmmh wrote:ive stopped using a virusscanner a long time ago, they all suck
werd... virus scanners are for suckers.
Tormentius
Posts: 4108
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Tormentius »

Arkleseizure wrote:AVG sucks.
Quite agreed. AVG's trojan handling capabilities and real-time protection suck. I've used it on my own systems and I've run it as the antivirus solution on a network before. Lets just say the network version is nothing shy of pathetic.


For free scanners Antivir is great and for paid versions I've had great results with Symantec products. The problem with the original poster's system is most likely a lack of memory.
Last edited by Tormentius on Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
dmmh
Posts: 2501
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dmmh »

Dr_Watson wrote:
dmmh wrote:ive stopped using a virusscanner a long time ago, they all suck
werd... virus scanners are for suckers.
I have one installed on both my notebook and my pc though, just in case, but they are always off
[i]And shepherds we shall be, for thee my Lord for thee, Power hath descended forth from thy hand, that our feet may swiftly carry out thy command, we shall flow a river forth to thee, and teeming with souls shall it ever be. In nomine patris, et fili, et spiritus sancti.[/i]
SOAPboy
Posts: 8268
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 7:00 am

Post by SOAPboy »

rep wrote:Care to elaborate?

My experience is Norton and McAfee are so bloated they both take 40-60MB of RAM just to operate.

Quake 3 uses what, 56 as default? Fuck those programs. AVG seems to work fine.

The best defense is using Opera and surfing with a little brains.

You make me laugh.. you know "EVERYTHING" yet know nothing

AVG is the WORST antivirus on the planet in terms of actually finding virii.. fill a machine up with virii, and run AVG.. itll find 1/2 of them, tops..
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

from here:
http://www.virus.gr/english/fullxml/def ... =67&mnu=67

test was made on 10-25 August 2004, see page for details - end ranking:
1. Kaspersky Personal Pro version 4.5.0.58 - 99.09%

2. F-Secure 2004 version 4.71.5 - 98.77%

3. Extendia AVK Pro version 11.0.4 - 98.68%

4. AVK version 14.0.7 - 98.50%

5. Kaspersky Personal version 5.0.149 - 97.88%

6. eScan 2003 Virus Control version 2.6.484.8 - 96.75%

7. McAfee version 8.0.41 - 93.59%

8. Norton version 2004 Professional - 93.38%

9. RAV version 8.6.105 - 93.14%

10. F-Prot version 3.15 - 91.85%

11. Command version 4.90 - 91.41%

12. Panda Titanium version 3.02.00 - 91.38%

13. Norton Corporate version 9.0.0.338 - 90.29%

14. Panda Platinum version 7.05.04 - 89.97%

15. MKS_VIR 2004 version 2.0 - 89.45%

16. Virus Chaser version 5.0 - 89.07%

17. BitDefender version 7.2 - 88.52%

18. BullGuard version 4.5 - 87.26%

19. Dr. Web version 4.31b - 85.35%

20. PC-Cillin 2004 version 11.00.1253 - 84.80%

21. Nod32 version 2.0.0.9 database 1.840 - 82.68%

22. Sophos Sweep version 3.84 - 81.31%

23. Avast version 4.1.418 - 80.55%

24. AntiVir version 6.27.00.01 - 79.57%

25. Vexira version 2.14.00.01 - 79.50%

26. AVG version 7.0.262 - 72.50%

27. Norman version 5.70.14 - 67.72%

28. UNA version 1.83 - 62.85%

29. Solo 2.5 version 2.6.3 - 61.08%

30. ZoneAlarm with VET Antivirus version 5.0.590.015 - 60.82%

31. Fire version 2.7 - 60.52%

32. E-Trust version 6.2.0.28 - 58.48%

33. V-Buster Pro - 57.61%

34. Protector Plus version 7.2.F04 - 51.28%

35. VirScan Plus version 14.091 - 48.36%

36. ClamWin version 0.35 - 48.08%

37. ViRobot Expert version 4.0 - 45.68%

38. MR2S version 1.47 - 44.36%

39. V3Pro 2002 Deluxe version SP2 - 42.33%

40. RHBVS version 4.13.656 - 41.99%

41. Digital Patrol version 5.00.08 - 38.52%

42. Quick Heal version 7.01 - 30.13%

43. Wave version 2.0 - 22.07%

44. TDS version 3.2.0 - 16.67%

45. PestPatrol version 4.4.3.24 - 15.34%

46. A Squared 2 - 15.05%

47. AntiTrojan Shield version 1.4.0.9 - 11.82%

48. PC Door Guard version 3.0.0.14- 11.77%

49. Trojan Hunter version 3.9.807 - 6.76%

50. The Cleaner version 4.1.42.52 - 6.34%

51. Trojan Remover version 6.2.8 - 5.62%

52. Tauscan version 1.6.1024 - 4.82%

53. Hacker Eliminator version 1.2 - 3.38%

54. IP Armor version 5.46.0703 - 2.87%

55. Anti-Hacker & Trojan Expert 2003 version 1.6 - 0%
bear in mind that's how well they perfom as anti-virus apps, not how much they batter the machine.

just remembered though, shouldn't your isp protect you?
Arkleseizure
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 1:06 am

Post by Arkleseizure »

23. Avast version 4.1.418 - 80.55%

24. AntiVir version 6.27.00.01 - 79.57%

26. AVG version 7.0.262 - 72.50%
Post Reply