PHOTOS PLEASE

Post by **FanaticX** » Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:32 pm

Dave wrote:Man I love film...

You love the look of film...

I love the look of film and still shoot 120 film.

If you shoot as a hobby, film is sweet no doubts.

If you shoot for paychecks, especially sports, you would hate it compared to digital(from experience). Constant trips to the developers, down time, scan and edit time, huge ass file sizes, etc...FUCK MAN!! I am glad I don't have to rush through that shit anymore. LOL

Post by **FanaticX** » Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:36 pm

Fuji Provia 400F / Epson 4990. Selective colour in CS2.

Love the grain and feel...

Post by **Doombrain** » Mon Sep 11, 2006 6:14 pm

you should update your scanner to the v750pro

Post by **Dave** » Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:53 pm

FanaticX wrote:

Fuji Provia 400F / Epson 4990. Selective colour in CS2.

Love the grain and feel...

It's out of focus

Post by mac* » Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:58 pm

i'll just throw a few other vacation pics in... *shrug*

thoose pictures where taken at the ohrid lake / macedonia

Vienna / Austria

Post by **Doombrain** » Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:11 pm

ok? *quiz?*

Post by **Dave** » Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:58 pm

ToxicBug wrote:How much for the 5D dave? I really wanna go full frame.

I'm not going to sell it :icon26:

Post by mac* » Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:50 pm

Doombrain wrote:ok? *quiz?*

@dave: has the 5D a grid option for the viewfinder ?

Post by **ToxicBug** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:48 am

Dave wrote:
ToxicBug wrote:How much for the 5D dave? I really wanna go full frame.
I'm not going to sell it :icon26:

:icon33:

Post by **PhoeniX** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:03 am

Where are the London pics?

Post by **Dave** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:06 am

mac* wrote:
Doombrain wrote:ok? *quiz?*

@dave: has the 5D a grid option for the viewfinder ?

Yep

Post by **ToxicBug** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:42 am

PhoeniX wrote:Where are the London pics?

I'm too lazy to process them, should be soon though. In fact, I'll start right now.

Post by **prince1000** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:56 am

Dave wrote:
prince1000 wrote:what? what are you shooting film with? and where are your processing it? at school?
EOS-1V and Walgreens

Walgreens uses this amazing Fuji Frontier system. The only downside is that it costs $13 for 36 prints and a photo CD. Maybe development only and a photo CD are cheaper, though. I can't do much with the prints except give them away. I guess the other downside is they only give you 4x6 jpegs. If you want larger you have to scan them yourself. I've only ever processed B&W at school.

i almost bought a 1V a couple months ago. opted for the d200 instead, mainly becasue there's only a handful of pro labs left on the east coast and it's far too expensive. shame c-41 and ra-4 is getting completely phased out since you can't develop it at home like you can b&w.

noritsu is kodak chem and paper (or was at least 2 years ago). never cared for fuji outside of their film. i always found their minilab paper to be too thin and far too green/blue. and fuck them scanning for you. you can buy a 4800dpi scanner (1200 film) for under $200 with quality results.

Post by **prince1000** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:58 am

ToxicBug wrote:
PhoeniX wrote:Where are the London pics?
I'm too lazy to process them, should be soon though. In fact, I'll start right now.

it's post-production, not processing.

Post by **prince1000** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 7:01 am

Dave wrote:
FanaticX wrote:

Fuji Provia 400F / Epson 4990. Selective colour in CS2.

Love the grain and feel...
It's out of focus

Post by **Doombrain** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 7:22 am

i still like it

Post by **Doombrain** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:32 am

It's OOF but i didn't really want to subject to catch me shooting, he looked like a nutter and was very drunk. I had the 17 - 40mm on so i was right next to him.

Post by **Dave** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:20 pm

prince1000 wrote:
ToxicBug wrote:
PhoeniX wrote:Where are the London pics?
I'm too lazy to process them, should be soon though. In fact, I'll start right now.
it's post-production, not processing.

does it really even matter?

Post by **ToxicBug** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:11 pm

If it was sharper, that pic would be really really cool DB. Gotta have balls to just take a pic like that of some drunk standing right next to you on a train :icon14:

Post by **Doombrain** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:44 pm

cheers. worse than train, it was the subway

Post by **Dave** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:57 pm

I'm mostly impressed you were able to frame it while holding the lens steady on a moving train presumably with one hand while trying to aim and not be seen by an obviously derranged individual... Nice pic too, but I appreciate the challenge more

Post by **Doombrain** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:05 pm

cheers

Post by **prince1000** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:22 pm

Dave wrote:
prince1000 wrote:
ToxicBug wrote: I'm too lazy to process them, should be soon though. In fact, I'll start right now.
it's post-production, not processing.
does it really even matter?

they're two distinctly different things. all im sayin'...

Post by **prince1000** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:24 pm

ToxicBug wrote:If it was sharper, that pic would be really really cool DB. Gotta have balls to just take a pic like that of some drunk standing right next to you on a train :icon14:

shit doesnt have to be in focus for it to be a good shoot. its enough to read the tats on his arm.

Post by **werldhed** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:43 pm

I agree... it makes it look kind of grainy and eerie. It makes it even creepier.
I likes it. :icon14: