PHOTOS PLEASE

Post by **S@M** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:22 am

[lvlshot]http://www.adam.com.au/samanoske/IMG_0768.JPG[/lvlshot]

Post by **MKJ** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:06 am

raw wrote:

you know, my dad and a friend of his used to fax cartoons of exactly that like 15 years ago

dont know how old that book is though

Post by **Doombrain** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:38 am

Post by **S@M** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:50 am

explain urself doombrain where, who, why...

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:39 am

MKJ wrote:
you know, my dad and a friend of his used to fax cartoons of exactly that like 15 years ago
dont know how old that book is though

about that old.

Post by **MKJ** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:41 am

well there you go then

Post by **Doombrain** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 1:44 pm

Post by **Doombrain** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:24 pm

Post by **S@M** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:56 pm

appart from the air con units, I quite like this last one mainly for teh wodden framed windows

Post by **prince1000** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:20 am

nice DB

Post by **Dave** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:23 am

troo. i like the one with the girl. might want to crop it tighter to get rid of the dark pink shirt, but overall it looks great. I'm also wondering why there is an orange traffic cone in the building shot

Post by **prince1000** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:33 am

edit in the camera

Post by **Dave** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:48 am

Then we might as well not use digital

Post by **Chupacabra** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 4:12 am

mjrpes wrote:
Dave wrote:

jesus that's amazing. it almost looks like cgi... the lighting is so good.

maybe it is cgi?

i'm not sure about this one, but aren't most of the pictures in this thread digitally edited? whats included in the definition of cgi anyway?

anyway, hope i'm not in anyway taking away from your picture dave. its really a pretty badass pic.

Post by **MKJ** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:20 am

well cgi would be computer generated imagery. touching up a photo therefore is not cgi.

Post by **Ryoki** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:46 am

So Dave, have you made this photography thing your job yet?
Because it would seem you're fucking good at it.

Post by **Doombrain** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:20 am

prince1000 wrote:nice DB

cheers

Dave, that shot is outstanding

Post by **Dave** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 11:03 am

troo

now why is there a traffic cone in that building? it vexes me greatly. It's those little uncertainities in that pic that make it wunderbar.

Post by **Dave** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 11:07 am

Ryoki wrote:So Dave, have you made this photography thing your job yet?
Because it would seem you're fucking good at it.

TY sir. It requires time I really don't have at the moment. I also lack experience, which I plan on using my weekends this fall fixing. I'm trying to break into some local sporting events... I just can't get the damn university atheltic department to return my email. It might be time to call some favors

Post by **Dave** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 11:13 am

Oh, btw DB... what lenses are you using on that Epson? The color is outstanding

Post by **Doombrain** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:19 pm

Dave wrote:Oh, btw DB... what lenses are you using on that Epson? The color is outstanding

ZEISS BIOGON T* f/2 35mm ZM

The cone's a reflection from the street corner on the other side.

Post by **werldhed** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:49 pm

Chupacabra wrote:
maybe it is cgi?

i'm not sure about this one, but aren't most of the pictures in this thread digitally edited? whats included in the definition of cgi anyway?

anyway, hope i'm not in anyway taking away from your picture dave. its really a pretty badass pic.

I don't think most are altered. None of mine are, except the panoramics, of course.

At most, some people do the sharpen/unsharpen or hue/color/brightness levels, but that's nothing you can't do in a standard darkroom.

The art of photography is more in composing the shot than it is about how bright your colors are.

Post by **raw** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:53 pm

Post by **Doombrain** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:40 pm

BIG FISH SMALL FISH BIG FISH SMALL FISH

MAKE A BOX, MAKE A BOX

Post by **MKJ** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:58 pm

Doombrain wrote:BIG FISH SMALL FISH BIG FISH SMALL FISH

MAKE A BOX, MAKE A BOX

yes i actually know what youre talking about