The myth of lactic acid - it's actually fuel used by muscles

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

Kracus wrote:
werldhed wrote:You used to DRINK lactic acid?
Do they make it in drinkable form?
Yeah they do, it's called milk.
That's even better.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

you made sure you drank the the levo isomer of it, right kracus?

because that dextral shit won't do a damn thing for you.
Wizard .3
Posts: 529
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Wizard .3 »

A new low haha :olo:
Wizard .3
Posts: 529
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2000 8:00 am

Ya,

Post by Wizard .3 »

tnf wrote:
Canis wrote:That's strange, because in basic metabolism they show how lactic acid is formed and broken down to create energy. Its less efficient than glycolosys, but it still generates energy.
Glycolysis is required before you make lactic acid, because you use th pyruvate produced as the electron acceptor...i think you mean its less efficient than aerobic respiration with oxygen at the end.
Ya, you get less electrons out of anaerobic respiration if I remember correctly (therefore less ATP?), making it much less efficient.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Ya,

Post by tnf »

Wizard .3 wrote:
tnf wrote:
Canis wrote:That's strange, because in basic metabolism they show how lactic acid is formed and broken down to create energy. Its less efficient than glycolosys, but it still generates energy.
Glycolysis is required before you make lactic acid, because you use th pyruvate produced as the electron acceptor...i think you mean its less efficient than aerobic respiration with oxygen at the end.
Ya, you get less electrons out of anaerobic respiration if I remember correctly (therefore less ATP?), making it much less efficient.
Yea, the proton gradient established by the ETC produces ATP through the action of ATP synthase....so you get less ATP produced overall that way.
Fender
Posts: 5876
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Fender »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:JESUS FUCKING CHRIST KRACUS, YOU DUMB MOTHERFUCKER
:olo: Kracus got Juggy to swear! :olo:
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

lol
Tormentius
Posts: 4108
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Tormentius »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST KRACUS, YOU DUMB MOTHERFUCKER
Bwahahahahahahaha
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

But to be honest, lactic acid really isn't 'fuel'....so the title is incorrect too...unless there is a major breakthrough in that article that I haven't read yet.
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

tnf wrote:But to be honest, lactic acid really isn't 'fuel'....so the title is incorrect too...unless there is a major breakthrough in that article that I haven't read yet.
umm... from the third paragraph of the article:
Lactic acid is actually a fuel, not a caustic waste product. Muscles make it deliberately, producing it from glucose, and they burn it to obtain energy. The reason trained athletes can perform so hard and so long is because their intense training causes their muscles to adapt so they more readily and efficiently absorb lactic acid.
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

These paragraphs seem key:
Experiments with dead frogs in the 1920s seemed to show that lactate build-up eventually causes muscles to stop working. But Brooks in the 1980s and '90s showed that in living, breathing animals, the lactate moves out of muscle cells into the blood and travels to various organs, including the liver, where it is burned with oxygen to make ATP. The heart even prefers lactate as a fuel, Brooks found.

Brooks always suspected, however, that the muscle cell itself could reuse lactate, and in experiments over the past 10 years he found evidence that lactate is burned inside the mitochondria, an interconnected network of tubes, like a plumbing system, that reaches throughout the cell cytoplasm.
Canis
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Canis »

mjrpes wrote:
tnf wrote:But to be honest, lactic acid really isn't 'fuel'....so the title is incorrect too...unless there is a major breakthrough in that article that I haven't read yet.
umm... from the third paragraph of the article:
Lactic acid is actually a fuel, not a caustic waste product. Muscles make it deliberately, producing it from glucose, and they burn it to obtain energy. The reason trained athletes can perform so hard and so long is because their intense training causes their muscles to adapt so they more readily and efficiently absorb lactic acid.
Its a fuel, but derived from a primary source (Glucose) after a bout of anaerobic exercise. The preferred source is glucose, but in anaerobic exercise an alternative chemical reaction is undertaken which results in lactic acid accumulation. The muscles can metabolize this, but arent used to doing so. As such, lactic acid buildup occurs and you're left with aching muscles. Athletes have built up a much more efficient muscle that can metabolize lactic acid for its energy, and therefore build up fewer reserves of the stuff, causing not only a more efficient muscle, but also less negative effects from the lactic acid.
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

Canis, your saying "lactic acid buildup occurs and you're left with aching muscles" goes against what the nytimes article says:
As for the idea that lactic acid causes muscle soreness, Dr. Gladden said, that never made sense.

"Lactic acid will be gone from your muscles within an hour of exercise," he said. "You get sore one to three days later. The time frame is not consistent, and the mechanisms have not been found."
Who is right?
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

as tnf pointed out there is a source of confusion when it comes to muscle soreness - the acute burning sensation which is short term, and the delayed onset muscle soreness which comes a day or 2 after (DOMS).

I think there's speculation that the OH+ ions from the lactic acid somehow react with pain receptors or something - remember reading something vaguely like that on a msgboard a while back.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Men, I so love to see all of you arguing over a subject/topic. Whatever it is, it will always be more constructive to me to see all your points, arguments. I learn a lot from you all. Thanks for all your argumentations and keep on.
I am watching you and learning from you in a way from afar.
Wizard .3
Posts: 529
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Wizard .3 »

mjrpes wrote:Canis, your saying "lactic acid buildup occurs and you're left with aching muscles" goes against what the nytimes article says:
As for the idea that lactic acid causes muscle soreness, Dr. Gladden said, that never made sense.

"Lactic acid will be gone from your muscles within an hour of exercise," he said. "You get sore one to three days later. The time frame is not consistent, and the mechanisms have not been found."
Who is right?
The burning sensation is caused from the lactic acid, and the longterm soreness that occurs the day after is from muscle tear during exercise. I think.
:icon26:
Maiden
Posts: 832
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Maiden »

Fender wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:JESUS FUCKING CHRIST KRACUS, YOU DUMB MOTHERFUCKER
:olo: Kracus got Juggy to swear! :olo:
now thats fucking funny
Canis
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Canis »

mjrpes wrote:Canis, your saying "lactic acid buildup occurs and you're left with aching muscles" goes against what the nytimes article says:
As for the idea that lactic acid causes muscle soreness, Dr. Gladden said, that never made sense.

"Lactic acid will be gone from your muscles within an hour of exercise," he said. "You get sore one to three days later. The time frame is not consistent, and the mechanisms have not been found."
Who is right?
Try clenching and flexing your hands over and over again as fast as you can. Do it until you feel a burn, and keep doing it. It becomes agony after a while...lactic acid buildup among other things is the result. Soreness a few days later isnt lactic acid. I'm talking about in the moment.
Canis
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Canis »

Wizard .3 wrote:
mjrpes wrote:Canis, your saying "lactic acid buildup occurs and you're left with aching muscles" goes against what the nytimes article says:
As for the idea that lactic acid causes muscle soreness, Dr. Gladden said, that never made sense.

"Lactic acid will be gone from your muscles within an hour of exercise," he said. "You get sore one to three days later. The time frame is not consistent, and the mechanisms have not been found."
Who is right?
The burning sensation is caused from the lactic acid, and the longterm soreness that occurs the day after is from muscle tear during exercise. I think.
:icon26:
That's correct. Lactic acid is just a metabolite (a product of metabolism and in that sense similar to CO2). These metabolites create an acidic environment that does several things. They act as local vasodialators so more blood reaches the active area, and have several system-wide effects such as hormone release, opioid production, and increased affinity of the blood for O2. Its all part of the response to increased activity/exercise.
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Post by plained »

ey let me get this strait, so they were wrong before ,but theyze right now ey

right on wont be long now b4 everyone look like greek god statue :icon19:
it is about time!
Guest

Post by Guest »

I had MY lactic acids this morning what about you fucking fairies?
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Post by plained »

udderly ridiculous :olo:
it is about time!
Canis
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Canis »

He's trying to play off his stupidity as a joke.
prince1000
Posts: 1892
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2001 8:00 am

Post by prince1000 »

R00k wrote:
Nightshade wrote:how many confirmed kills do you have?
Kracus wrote:That's none of your buisness

:olo: :olo: :olo:
bahahahhahah

*pity post for kracus*
Post Reply