yeah i'm just a conspiracy nut...okay...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:23 pm

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2005/732/in2.htm

part of the last paragraph...

"You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security."

hmmm...cough...911..cough...

dumbfucks...

Post by **Pext** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:32 pm

interresting read - i did not realize there is pressure on other journalists if one is captured as they dont want the person to die.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 8:46 pm

Has it ever occured to you that it may be entirely possible that a terrorist group might actualy try to kidnap a journalist, then make it look like they didn't, so that it looks like the coalition is doing so more people rise up against them?

Just something to think about.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:21 pm

Kracus wrote:Has it ever occured to you that it may be entirely possible that a terrorist group might actualy try to kidnap a journalist, then make it look like they didn't, so that it looks like the coalition is doing so more people rise up against them?

Just something to think about.

lol...moron...

Post by **ilum0s** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:46 pm

Freakaloin wrote:lol...moron...

He's a moron why...?

Hmm I detect some slight irony goof...

Interesting read btw, and it wouldn't surprise me a huge amount if the real truth about 911 was something along those lines from the former Gladio member, and didn't the pentagon/whitehouse/bush have sufficient inteligence on the possibility of an impending attack to maybe do something about it?

Post by **losCHUNK** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:57 pm