http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/JoeR/pe ... ns_est.htm
haven't read this yet, but seems to debunk the no-757 @ pentagon theory
discussion here:
http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/50612
CNN Covering 9/11 Discrepancies - really!
The Pentagon mess is a red herring of a debate -- a lack of video doesn't mean there was some kind of missile or something.
It's really irrelevant to the overall picture of what happened that day.
People are starting to wake up to the fact that the 9/11 Commission included a lot of lies and distortions in their report. From that, it's only a matter of time before people begin to question what kind of motive they could have had to do such a thing.
Once a few more high-profile celebs and such come out to talk about it, maybe the sheeple of the country will perk up their ears and be led by somebody else for a change.
It's really irrelevant to the overall picture of what happened that day.
People are starting to wake up to the fact that the 9/11 Commission included a lot of lies and distortions in their report. From that, it's only a matter of time before people begin to question what kind of motive they could have had to do such a thing.
Once a few more high-profile celebs and such come out to talk about it, maybe the sheeple of the country will perk up their ears and be led by somebody else for a change.
-
[xeno]Julios
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
yea the author of this debunking is clear about the fact that there are a lot of lies and distortions around 9/11. At the end of article are a list of researchers he support, including Alex Jones.R00k wrote:The Pentagon mess is a red herring of a debate -- a lack of video doesn't mean there was some kind of missile or something.
It's really irrelevant to the overall picture of what happened that day.
People are starting to wake up to the fact that the 9/11 Commission included a lot of lies and distortions in their report. From that, it's only a matter of time before people begin to question what kind of motive they could have had to do such a thing.
Oh n/m - that's a pretty good article from what I've skimmed over. I didn't really feel like reading over another Pentagon debunking, but this one's done pretty well.[xeno]Julios wrote:yea the author of this debunking is clear about the fact that there are a lot of lies and distortions around 9/11. At the end of article are a list of researchers he support, including Alex Jones.
-
JulesWinnfield
- Posts: 625
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:09 pm
I don't really remember, I just seem to recall it for some reason. Of all of the TV coverage for the day that was the only thing I actually saw - my memory could very likely be flawed regarding it.R00k wrote:I don't know where you got the idea that they only charged and detonated the first couple of floors of WTC7 though - I haven't heard or read that anywhere.