foobar 0.9's out
-
phantasmagoria
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am
foobar 0.9's out
Last edited by phantasmagoria on Mon Apr 03, 2006 11:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
[size=85]
-
phantasmagoria
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am
-
phantasmagoria
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am
From the wikipedia article on it:
* Open component architecture allowing third-party developers to extend functionality of the player
* Full Unicode support on Windows NT
* ReplayGain support
* Low memory footprint, efficient handling of really large playlists
* Advanced file info processing capabilities (generic file info box and masstagger)
* Highly customizable playlist display
* Customizable keyboard shortcuts
* Gapless Playback
* Multiple playlists
* Music database
* Streaming Support
* Extensive "plug-in" support
I originally got it because they fucked up with winamp3, and I also wanted something with global hotkeys so i could change song when playing quake.
With regard to the ui, get the columns ui plugin and have a mess about with it. Because 9.0 is quite new a lot of the old plugins don't work but they're getting on it, you can see other people's foobars here, it requires a bit of effort and intelligence to get it looking nice, but it's worth it:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/ind ... opic=43077
* Open component architecture allowing third-party developers to extend functionality of the player
* Full Unicode support on Windows NT
* ReplayGain support
* Low memory footprint, efficient handling of really large playlists
* Advanced file info processing capabilities (generic file info box and masstagger)
* Highly customizable playlist display
* Customizable keyboard shortcuts
* Gapless Playback
* Multiple playlists
* Music database
* Streaming Support
* Extensive "plug-in" support
I originally got it because they fucked up with winamp3, and I also wanted something with global hotkeys so i could change song when playing quake.
With regard to the ui, get the columns ui plugin and have a mess about with it. Because 9.0 is quite new a lot of the old plugins don't work but they're getting on it, you can see other people's foobars here, it requires a bit of effort and intelligence to get it looking nice, but it's worth it:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/ind ... opic=43077
[size=85]
phantasmagoria wrote:From the wikipedia article on it:
* Open component architecture allowing third-party developers to extend functionality of the player
* Full Unicode support on Windows NT
* ReplayGain support
* Low memory footprint, efficient handling of really large playlists
* Advanced file info processing capabilities (generic file info box and masstagger)
* Highly customizable playlist display
* Customizable keyboard shortcuts
* Gapless Playback
* Multiple playlists
* Music database
* Streaming Support
* Extensive "plug-in" support
I originally got it because they fucked up with winamp3, and I also wanted something with global hotkeys so i could change song when playing quake.
With regard to the ui, get the columns ui plugin and have a mess about with it. Because 9.0 is quite new a lot of the old plugins don't work but they're getting on it, you can see other people's foobars here, it requires a bit of effort and intelligence to get it looking nice, but it's worth it:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/ind ... opic=43077
sorry, am confused - so basically its does mass tagging - and thats pretty much about it in terms of killer features?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/no3y3h4nd][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/no3y3h4nd.jpg[/img][/url]
-
phantasmagoria
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am
well personally, I don't need a music player that slows my computer to a halt taking all the processing power to display some retarded visualisation with hundreds of different functionalities that I have no need for.
Its selling point is that it's not bloatware. Think of it as the utorrent of music players.
Its selling point is that it's not bloatware. Think of it as the utorrent of music players.
[size=85]
-
Chupacabra
- Posts: 3783
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2001 7:00 am
you can disable visualizations in winamp...phantasmagoria wrote:well personally, I don't need a music player that slows my computer to a halt taking all the processing power to display some retarded visualisation with hundreds of different functionalities that I have no need for.
Its selling point is that it's not bloatware. Think of it as the utorrent of music players.
-
Deathshroud
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm
To you guys who like Foobar, you would prolly also like VLC, great media player.
http://www.videolan.org/
http://www.videolan.org/
-
phantasmagoria
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am
but you can't disable the rest of it.Chupacabra wrote:you can disable visualizations in winamp...phantasmagoria wrote:well personally, I don't need a music player that slows my computer to a halt taking all the processing power to display some retarded visualisation with hundreds of different functionalities that I have no need for.
Its selling point is that it's not bloatware. Think of it as the utorrent of music players.
[size=85]
utorrent is actually pretty nice visually, one of the best i've seen. reminds me of emule in a way.
the thing I like most about foobar is the "tabbed" multiple playlist feature. from what i remember you could only have one playlist opened at a time in winamp. but this was a long time ago so maybe things have changed.
i also like the minimal interface, which, seeing that i always have the player minimized to the taskbar, works for me.
the search feature is also nice and very quick. it searches multiple playlists with the results displaying as you type.
the one thing i don't like about foobar is there's no simple way to 'refresh' a playlist. i base playlists off of directories, so when i add music to a directory, i have to update the playlist by 'clearing' it and selecting the directory again from a folder browser.
the thing I like most about foobar is the "tabbed" multiple playlist feature. from what i remember you could only have one playlist opened at a time in winamp. but this was a long time ago so maybe things have changed.
i also like the minimal interface, which, seeing that i always have the player minimized to the taskbar, works for me.
the search feature is also nice and very quick. it searches multiple playlists with the results displaying as you type.
the one thing i don't like about foobar is there's no simple way to 'refresh' a playlist. i base playlists off of directories, so when i add music to a directory, i have to update the playlist by 'clearing' it and selecting the directory again from a folder browser.
Last edited by mjrpes on Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Chupacabra
- Posts: 3783
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2001 7:00 am
i suppose. what are your computer specs though? i dont understand how it can slow your computer to a halt. i have a pentium 3, 800mhz, 128mb ram computer and winamp isnt slowing my computer down to a halt.phantasmagoria wrote:but you can't disable the rest of it.Chupacabra wrote:you can disable visualizations in winamp...phantasmagoria wrote:well personally, I don't need a music player that slows my computer to a halt taking all the processing power to display some retarded visualisation with hundreds of different functionalities that I have no need for.
Its selling point is that it's not bloatware. Think of it as the utorrent of music players.
-
phantasmagoria
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am
-
CheapAlert
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 8:00 am
When properly configured (and that's on a full install, not lite, altough I rarely use the visual stuff) Winamp 5 takes between 5-10mb of ram and 0-2% cpu cycles on my so-so machine. Don't you love it when sheep follow common internet trends to bash anything in sight?CheapAlert wrote:strange. i've used WinAMP 5 while playing some QW online on my p2 233 without a problem.
Winamp can be light as well.. use a old style skin, and turn off all the garbage..Chupacabra wrote:you can disable visualizations in winamp...phantasmagoria wrote:well personally, I don't need a music player that slows my computer to a halt taking all the processing power to display some retarded visualisation with hundreds of different functionalities that I have no need for.
Its selling point is that it's not bloatware. Think of it as the utorrent of music players.
tho, if you cant run winamp with vis off and play a game, you need to fucking upgrade..
[size=75][i]I once had a glass of milk.
It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.
I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.
I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
-
Deathshroud
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm
-
phantasmagoria
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am
http://img90.imageshack.us/my.php?image ... afb8ya.jpg
I'm trying to get the guy who made that to gimme his config.
You start with colums_ui, album_art and file_info plugins, i can't remember their specific names, or which versions are going to work with foobar 0.9 and then have a look round the hydrogenaudio forums for other people's examples and import them, or you can write your own. I need to put half a day aside so I can relearn it, it's been over a year since i properly fiddled with foobar.
I'm trying to get the guy who made that to gimme his config.
You start with colums_ui, album_art and file_info plugins, i can't remember their specific names, or which versions are going to work with foobar 0.9 and then have a look round the hydrogenaudio forums for other people's examples and import them, or you can write your own. I need to put half a day aside so I can relearn it, it's been over a year since i properly fiddled with foobar.
[size=85]