Website opinions

Post by **brisk** » Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:55 pm

mik0rs wrote:
Dave wrote: I knocked this up in about 30 seconds to show you what I mean, so i know it looks bad
Aww you used my image as a base

Just remember who actually took the photograph, son

Post by **mik0rs** » Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:56 pm

Lol, I was going to say "my modified image" but that sounded even worse... ya cunt

Post by **Dave** » Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:57 pm

you might, but i think you need a dark color in there. I'd have to see it to be have any opinion, though. This is the part I hate about web design.. moving color and text sizes around

Post by **Dave** » Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:58 pm

mik0rs wrote:Lol, I was going to say "my modified image" but that sounded even worse... ya cunt

You could say the image you plagiarized from brisk that I plagiarized from you

Post by **mik0rs** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:01 am

I'm sorry I don't take advice from image thieves.

Post by **Dave** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:03 am

I make my own images

usually...

Post by **mik0rs** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:03 am

Post by **mik0rs** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:06 am

Okay this forum is a tad off, SQL mistake or something? I know I made those two posts consecutively.

Post by **Dave** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:07 am

It's done that before.. dunno why. It might have something to do with the quick reply because everytime it's happened to me, i've used the QR

Post by **mik0rs** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:12 am

Hmmmm, yeah possibly, no idea why that would be any different to the standard reply form but then I've never looked at the phpBB forums. Strange.

Post by **brisk** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:12 am

mik0rs clearly just wanted to add to his postcount, 2000 style. The sly fox.

Post by **Transient** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:18 am

postcount +1

Post by **mik0rs** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:21 am

Spam-a-lam-a-ding-dong.

Heh, this is the busiest I've been on here in months, I must have posted hearly 10 times today.

Post by **Foo** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:32 am

Post by **Transient** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 4:04 am

Post by **FragaGeddon** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:16 am

You should have a close up shot of a record and use that.

Post by **Whiskey 7** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:31 am

Dave wrote:
brisk wrote:[lvlshot]http://www.onefootinthegroove.net/test/ofitg_color1.jpg[/lvlshot]

Those are better colours I think.
i like these colors, but I like the other logo more

Yes, I have to agree with Dave.

I like the new turquoise design over the old white one in any case.

Post by **MKJ** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:13 am

i think the header is too bulky. you wont see any content on an 800x600 resolution. (youd be suprised how many people still use that res). adding the logo to the header img might help, as well as reducing the height of the headerimg a bit. it may look nice but its not very functional. its a bit like Duplo

Post by ek » Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:48 am

I like it, its pretty simple and clean. But then again I am on a pretty high resolution.

Post by **brisk** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:59 am

Oh, I should have mentioned that all those header images were just placeholders until I photograph the real ones heh. But I may keep a few of em depending on reaction.

MKJ: Read up, thats already discussed and will be sorted

But cheers for the feedback guys. Its helped a lot.

Post by **S@M** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 11:09 am

how about making buttons and text links alter on mouse over? I'd like to see that an how about a date of last update?

Post by **brisk** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 11:12 am

S@M wrote:how about making buttons and text links alter on mouse over? I'd like to see that an how about a date of last update?

They will eventually. As I say, the header will be converted to flash and everything will animate nicely.

Date of last update? The news script already has that.

Post by **plained** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 2:43 pm

i say give them what they want , even if its dated (to you and i).

the new colour set looks awfully close to apples' old bondi blue sceme.

i prefer the lavender tho

But No1 priority is the client and intuitiveness is where its at, they told you what they like.

the thing that i see with your bondi'ish set is each tone looks a little muddier then it should.

apple prolly spent alot of effort with that color set to be absolutly sure people would feel a certain feeling when seeing it.

jus my opinion , jus sayin

Post by **brisk** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 2:51 pm

Latest version:

http://www.onefootinthegroove.net/test/index6.php

Post by **MKJ** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 2:52 pm

your current adspace is an arbitrary 151x151px. best resize it to a widely used size. helps getting advertisers.
see doubleclick for common dimensions :A