Cruise Control ~ Must read safety issue

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
User avatar
Whiskey 7
Posts: 9711
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2001 7:00 am

Cruise Control ~ Must read safety issue

Post by Whiskey 7 »

Got this off a local communiqué and thought I didn't know that :confused:

Just might save your skin?
I wonder how many people know about this?

A 36-year-old female had an accident several weeks ago and totalled her car. A resident of Wollongong, NSW, she was travelling between Wollongong & Sydney. It was raining, though not excessively, when her car suddenly began to hydroplane and literally flew through the air.

She was not seriously injured but very stunned at the sudden occurrence! When she explained to the highway patrolman what had happened, he told her something that every driver should know - NEVER DRIVE IN THE RAIN WITH YOUR CRUISE CONTROL ON.

She had thought she was being cautious by setting the cruise control and maintaining a safe consistent speed in the rain. But the Highway Patrolman told her that if the cruise control is on and your car begins to hydroplane -- when your tyres lose contact with the pavement, your car will accelerate to a higher rate of speed and you take off like an airplane. She told the patrolman that was exactly what had occurred.

The Highway Patrol estimated her car was actually travelling through the air at 10 to 15 miles per hour faster than the speed set on the cruise control. The patrolman said this warning should be listed, on the driver's seat sun-visor - NEVER USE THE CRUISE CONTROL WHEN THE PAVEMENT IS WET OR ICY, along with the airbag warning.


We tell our teenagers to set the cruise control and drive a safe speed - but we don't tell them to use the cruise control only when the pavement is dry.

The only person the accident victim found, who knew this (besides the patrolman), was a man who had had a similar accident, totalled his car and sustained severe injuries.

If you send this to 15 people and only one of them doesn't know about this, then it was all worth it. You might have saved a life.
I thought of you people :D
werldhed
Posts: 4926
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am

Post by werldhed »

I don't mean to be an arrogant ass, but... duh.

Besides, you shouldn't have your cruise control on during adverse weather, regardless of hydroplaning. Common sense. :shrug:
K-mart Shopper
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:00 am

Post by K-mart Shopper »

I don't have cruise control. I'm saved myself!
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

werldhed wrote:I don't mean to be an arrogant ass, but... duh.

Besides, you shouldn't have your cruise control on during adverse weather, regardless of hydroplaning. Common sense. :shrug:
Exactly.

I can see using it during a light rain but who the hell would use cruise control on ice or during a down-poor? :olo:
feedback
Posts: 7449
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 8:00 am

Post by feedback »

A woman?
I love quake!
ek
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:03 am

Post by ek »

cruise control is for girls and those fake girls with dicks. oh and maybe tom cruise..
:drool:
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

and Sandra Bullocks, but obviously not Keanu Reeves
l0g1c
Posts: 1838
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by l0g1c »

Snopes seems to say this is true.
http://www.snopes.com/autos/techno/wetroad.asp

While I will agree that cruise-control during the rain is a bad idea, I can't help but be a little skeptical of the claim that the car will, in fact, speed up when the tires are slipping.

Most cars have no idea what the ground speed of the vehicle actually is. They know the circumference of the tire and how fast they are spinning. There's no reason the car would speed up to try to gain speed relative to the ground. If she heard the engine speed up, it was most likely because of the sudden lack of resistance on the tires.

So, I believe the story up until:
The Highway Patrol estimated her car was actually travelling through the air at 10 to 15 miles per hour faster than the speed set on the cruise control.
Anyways, just felt like picking nits.
werldhed
Posts: 4926
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am

Post by werldhed »

Why not? It's the same idea as wheels spinning faster when a car goes airborne...
It's also why they say you shouldn't spin your tires when they're not touching the ground.

Without friction or the weight of the car slowing it down, the engine is free to spin the tires as quickly as it wants. Then when you catch ground again, your wheels are spinning faster than they had been.

btw, I don't know shit about physics nor cars, so smart folks are free to call me out on this. :icon26:
l0g1c
Posts: 1838
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by l0g1c »

werldhed wrote:Why not? It's the same idea as wheels spinning faster when a car goes airborne...
It's also why they say you shouldn't spin your tires when they're not touching the ground.

Without friction or the weight of the car slowing it down, the engine is free to spin the tires as quickly as it wants. Then when you catch ground again, your wheels are spinning faster than they had been.

btw, I don't know shit about physics nor cars, so smart folks are free to call me out on this. :icon26:
Ok, to make things a little clearer, let's isolate this a bit. Let's say that we had mom's minivan on a dyno and a crane hooked to the back bumper. We set the cruise at 60 and bring the van up to speed.

Now, we pull the bumper up so that the tires loose contact with the dyno. What will happen initially is that the tires will spin faster because of the sudden lack of friction, but they will not continue to accelerate. Cruise control will see that the car's tires are spinning faster than 60 mph and ease back the throttle.

This is why I think it's impossible for a significant amount of speed to be gained (10-15 mph is what the article claims) by this phenomena.

So, yeah, sorry to gay up the thread. :p
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Post by losCHUNK »

i agree with l0gic, how can a car gain speed under its own power on a frictionless surface ?

and if its because of the wheels spinning really fast then hitting a piece of tarmac, then that car gained 15mph almost instantly... which is a bit hmmmmm
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
Jackal
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:00 am

Post by Jackal »

I don't think that the car "gains speed" in the air. What happens is that while the car is hydroplaning the wheels spin fast due to the lack of friction. When the tires stop hydroplaning the tires hit the ground spinning faster than they should be, causing the driver to lose control of the vehicle.
werldhed
Posts: 4926
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am

Post by werldhed »

l0g1c wrote:
werldhed wrote:Why not? It's the same idea as wheels spinning faster when a car goes airborne...
It's also why they say you shouldn't spin your tires when they're not touching the ground.

Without friction or the weight of the car slowing it down, the engine is free to spin the tires as quickly as it wants. Then when you catch ground again, your wheels are spinning faster than they had been.

btw, I don't know shit about physics nor cars, so smart folks are free to call me out on this. :icon26:
Ok, to make things a little clearer, let's isolate this a bit. Let's say that we had mom's minivan on a dyno and a crane hooked to the back bumper. We set the cruise at 60 and bring the van up to speed.

Now, we pull the bumper up so that the tires loose contact with the dyno. What will happen initially is that the tires will spin faster because of the sudden lack of friction, but they will not continue to accelerate. Cruise control will see that the car's tires are spinning faster than 60 mph and ease back the throttle.

This is why I think it's impossible for a significant amount of speed to be gained (10-15 mph is what the article claims) by this phenomena.

So, yeah, sorry to gay up the thread. :p
Okay, I'll grant you that 10-15 mph is probably a bit optimistic. However, cruise control doesn't actively brake the wheels to decelerate -- it just lets them coast. So I'd believe that in a short time the wheels could be spinning fairly quickly. And 10 mph isn't really that much of an increase...

I just figured her story sounded fanstastic because she didn't really understand what was going on, and thus explained it poorly.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

And that's just another chain letter.
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Post by plained »

it work good down an iccy hill ey
it is about time!
User avatar
Whiskey 7
Posts: 9711
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Whiskey 7 »

Jackal wrote:I don't think that the car "gains speed" in the air. What happens is that while the car is hydroplaning the wheels spin fast due to the lack of friction. When the tires stop hydroplaning the tires hit the ground spinning faster than they should be, causing the driver to lose control of the vehicle.
Now that sounds believeable.

Nice discussion all :D

l0g1c I have never seen that snopes site. Thanks.
Snopes seems to say this is true.
http://www.snopes.com/autos/techno/wetroad.asp
Kills On Site
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Kills On Site »

werldhed wrote:
Okay, I'll grant you that 10-15 mph is probably a bit optimistic. However, cruise control doesn't actively brake the wheels to decelerate -- it just lets them coast. So I'd believe that in a short time the wheels could be spinning fairly quickly. And 10 mph isn't really that much of an increase...

I just figured her story sounded fanstastic because she didn't really understand what was going on, and thus explained it poorly.
Some cruise control systems will engage the brake to maintain speed, or a set distance from a car via radar.


The reason I think that it got out of control is that the cruise control on most cars is meant to be very fluid, so it wasn't going to immidiately back off the throttle and maybe downshift. A computer can act more quickly then a human, but I am fairly certain that cruise control systems are built to be more comfortable cruising, and thus nothing happens too fast.
[size=92][color=#0000FF]Hugh Hefner for President[/color][/size]
Guest

Post by Guest »

Well it's definitely true but I've always known this. Not sure where I came by the info but I've always known that. It's pretty obvious too if you try it that it's not safe.
Guest

Post by Guest »

If that bitch was paying attention to the road, she wouldn't have crashed, regardless if she was using the cruise control or not. If she was just pressing on the gas and suddenly lost traction on one wheel, considering she was most likely in a fwd she would've torque steered or fishtailed in a rwd...
Guest

Post by Guest »

Actualy guys this happens to you when driving without cruise control if you keep the gas pressed at certain speeds usualy over 80km/h.
User avatar
FragaGeddon
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by FragaGeddon »

Well it was probably the extra resistance on the wheels from hydroplaning that caused the car to accelerate to keep the speed the same.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

I thought it was common sense not to use cruise control in less-than-ideal driving conditions anyway.

I think it's pretty obvious, knowing how vacuum-driving cruise controls work, that if you hit a slick patch the wheels will accelerate more for a good 3 seconds or so, but it will feather it down (gradually accelerate more slowly) until it's back to the speed that was set by the driver.

And any good driver knows that accelerating in the middle of a hydroplane is just about the worst thing you can do in most situations.
Post Reply