New Abu Ghraib Photos Released

Post by **Foo** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 2:32 am

Warning: Graphic Content. Nudity censored but violence left untamed. God bless America.

Tonight the SBS Dateline program plans to broadcast about 60 previously unpublished photographs that the US Government has been fighting to keep secret in a court case with the American Civil Liberties Union.

Although a US judge last year granted the union access to the photographs following a freedom-of-information request, the US Administration has appealed against the decision on the grounds their release would fuel anti-American sentiment.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/2/14/183059/640

Post by **andyman** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 2:39 am

what happens now?

Post by **Foo** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 2:41 am

I go to bed.

Then probably some drama and shit

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 2:51 am

bhadhakalah-drah

Post by **eepberries** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 2:55 am

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　`,｜ /
　　　　　 ,. -‐‐‐‐-- ､／＼～～* ―
　　　　／　　　　　○　＼／　　/ | '
　　　/　　／＼　　　０　 }
　　 l　　 <BOMB>　　　　 l
　　 {. 　　　＼／　　　　　|
　　 {　　MOHAMMED　　.}　　
　　　＼／￣￣＼　　,;■
　　　　/┗┓| |┏┛＼▲■■
　　　▲≪・≫ ≪・≫　▼■
　　　■　　/　 |　　　　■■
　　　■　 ■■■　　 ■■
　　　 ■■+++++■■■■
　　　　■■■■■■■
　　　　　■■■■■▼

Post by **Giraffe }{unter** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 3:05 am

durka durka durka durk

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 4:48 am

doombrain or whatever that kooks name is is getting off to this shit...

Post by **JulesWinnfield** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 4:51 am

eepberries wrote:　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　`,｜ /
　　　　　 ,. -‐‐‐‐-- ､／＼～～* ―
　　　　／　　　　　○　＼／　　/ | '
　　　/　　／＼　　　０　 }
　　 l　　 <BOMB>　　　　 l
　　 {. 　　　＼／　　　　　|
　　 {　　MOHAMMED　　.}　　
　　　＼／￣￣＼　　,;■
　　　　/┗┓| |┏┛＼▲■■
　　　▲≪・≫ ≪・≫　▼■
　　　■　　/　 |　　　　■■
　　　■　 ■■■　　 ■■
　　　 ■■+++++■■■■
　　　　■■■■■■■
　　　　　■■■■■▼

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:31 pm

http://today.reuters.com/tv/videoStory. ... 6b6b3fd557

Post by **Doombrain** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:39 pm

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:42 pm

yeah...ur dad doesn't really have 3 balls...

Post by **R00k** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:11 pm

Funny Reuters is running this now. According to the Australian news, American media outlets have had these pictures for quite a while - they don't know why we haven't published them before.

It's strange how they are billing these as worse than the original Abu Ghraib photos too. They are a little worse than the original ones, but not quite as bad as some are making them out to be. Remember when Seymour Hersh said there were pictures and videos of young boys being sodomized and such? Those are the ones the Pentagon didn't want to release.

Post by **saibot** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:34 pm

eepberries wrote:　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　`,｜ /
　　　　　 ,. -‐‐‐‐-- ､／＼～～* ―
　　　　／　　　　　○　＼／　　/ | '
　　　/　　／＼　　　０　 }
　　 l　　 <BOMB>　　　　 l
　　 {. 　　　＼／　　　　　|
　　 {　　MOHAMMED　　.}　　
　　　＼／￣￣＼　　,;■
　　　　/┗┓| |┏┛＼▲■■
　　　▲≪・≫ ≪・≫　▼■
　　　■　　/　 |　　　　■■
　　　■　 ■■■　　 ■■
　　　 ■■+++++■■■■
　　　　■■■■■■■
　　　　　■■■■■▼

could someone tell me what the hell this shit means?

Post by **Foo** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:40 pm

R00k wrote:It's strange how they are billing these as worse than the original Abu Ghraib photos too. They are a little worse than the original ones, but not quite as bad as some are making them out to be. Remember when Seymour Hersh said there were pictures and videos of young boys being sodomized and such? Those are the ones the Pentagon didn't want to release.

These aren't exhaustive, the papers are still afraid to release the truly graphic images. Apparently they have them, though.

Post by **R00k** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:52 pm

Oh. In that case, releasing these as the 'bad' ones only makes it look like these were the worst things that happened at Abu Ghraib. Which is the exact opposite of what they are claiming to do.

Post by **eepberries** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:54 pm

saibot wrote:
eepberries wrote:　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　`,｜ /
　　　　　 ,. -‐‐‐‐-- ､／＼～～* ―
　　　　／　　　　　○　＼／　　/ | '
　　　/　　／＼　　　０　 }
　　 l　　 <BOMB>　　　　 l
　　 {. 　　　＼／　　　　　|
　　 {　　MOHAMMED　　.}　　
　　　＼／￣￣＼　　,;■
　　　　/┗┓| |┏┛＼▲■■
　　　▲≪・≫ ≪・≫　▼■
　　　■　　/　 |　　　　■■
　　　■　 ■■■　　 ■■
　　　 ■■+++++■■■■
　　　　■■■■■■■
　　　　　■■■■■▼

could someone tell me what the hell this shit means?

lurk moar noob

Post by **Freakaloin** » Thu Feb 16, 2006 3:20 pm

heres all of em...

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/ ... folio.html

Post by **Doombrain** » Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:14 pm

Freakaloin wrote:yeah...ur dad doesn't really have 3 balls...

NO, YOUR MOM.