- actually it's understandable out of microsofts perspective. but i dont see why they are actually trying to establish their own music codec; mp3 seems to be fine and as it's a common standard, why change?
[i]And shepherds we shall be, for thee my Lord for thee, Power hath descended forth from thy hand, that our feet may swiftly carry out thy command, we shall flow a river forth to thee, and teeming with souls shall it ever be. In nomine patris, et fili, et spiritus sancti.[/i]
I don't care if they're pushing WMV, but MS needs to step up with a competitive product. They're missing a golden opportunity to step into another market.
Tormentius wrote:I don't care if they're pushing WMV, but MS needs to step up with a competitive product. They're missing a golden opportunity to step into another market.
Tormentius wrote:I don't care if they're pushing WMV, but MS needs to step up with a competitive product. They're missing a golden opportunity to step into another market.
don't you mean step on?
Meh, they usually improve on a product at the same time but you're right. Evil empires make for networks that are more enjoyable to administer though so I'm all for 'em.
It will do the trick. Probably a few hours a day listening time and the lack of LCD or options don't matter to me. Hell, at home on my PC I just kick up a genre-based playlist and let it run on shuffle without checking the artist
