fat tax!
most of these combinations of foods never stop being unhealthy no matter your BMIbusetibi wrote:another great american idea.
so what happens if your underweight and like eating cheese,meat, butter etc ?
why should you pay more because some fat fucking slob doesnt know when to stop eating?
don't be an ass
While I tend to agree with the concept, this made me laugh:
In addition to fat taxes, fashionable "preventative" policies include a minimum purchase age for designated foods, zoning restrictions on certain restaurants, and even stocking some snack foods out of customers' reach (behind the retail counter, right next to cigarettes and pornography) .
The idea of having a minimum age for buying unhealthy foods is a good one -- it's hard for a parent to keep their kid healthy, if the kid can just buy whatever he wants on his way to school and stash it in his locker. So personal/parental responsibility goes out the window.
But as far as taxing, I think it's a ridiculous notion, and another attempt at social engineering.
That being said, if insurance companies can charge higher rates for at-risk drivers, then how can we justify NOT having a fat tax if we were to go to a public healthcare system?
That makes it a little trickier.
But as far as taxing, I think it's a ridiculous notion, and another attempt at social engineering.
That being said, if insurance companies can charge higher rates for at-risk drivers, then how can we justify NOT having a fat tax if we were to go to a public healthcare system?
That makes it a little trickier.
-
[xeno]Julios
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
R00k wrote:The idea of having a minimum age for buying unhealthy foods is a good one -- it's hard for a parent to keep their kid healthy, if the kid can just buy whatever he wants on his way to school and stash it in his locker. So personal/parental responsibility goes out the window.
But as far as taxing, I think it's a ridiculous notion, and another attempt at social engineering.
That being said, if insurance companies can charge higher rates for at-risk drivers, then how can we justify NOT having a fat tax if we were to go to a public healthcare system?
That makes it a little trickier.
I agree that their credibility on this issue is running low, and it prolly IS just another way to create more capitol for the feds.
another problem with this is that instead of penalizing the general public with yet another tax, they should make healthy food more attainable, cause healthy foods tempt to be much more expensive.
I know from experiance that grocery shopping can turn into just another substitute of fast food because crap food is simply cheaper (unless you want to stack up on shit like beans etc.) after all when necessity calls the bottom line is filling up the refrigerator
canada is well on the way to getting rid of it from all foods. go to any store and you'll notice the no-trans fat label on every bag of chips and box of crackers.[xeno]Julios wrote:to be consistent, they should tax all food products that have trans fats in them.
there's also the problem of controversy over what constitutes risky food.
for example, not everyone believes butter is bad for you.
iirc there is even a bill pending to ban trans fat from food in canada altogether.