Is it safe to consider that the US was behind the 9/11 attacks and that a missile hit the pentagon and the world trade center was destroyed by contolled demolition?
By the way, if anyone hasn't seen Loose Change 2nd edition before, watch it (its free, so the torrent is legal): http://www.mininova.org/get/184395
ToxicBug wrote:Is it safe to consider that the US was behind the 9/11 attacks and that a missile hit the pentagon and the world trade center was destroyed by contolled demolition?
By the way, if anyone hasn't seen Loose Change 2nd edition before, watch it (its free, so the torrent is legal): http://www.mininova.org/get/184395
ok, i've watched the doc and it's pretty good. what it DOES demonstrate without a doubt is that the official explanation is bullshit. what it DOESN'T do is provide a fully worked out alternative theory (though the obvious 'reichstag fire' theory is lurking in the wings)
i wasn't rejecting the alternative theory (which is well supported by the evidence), just pointing out that the film-makers didn't dwell on that for too long, which makes sense if you're simply trying to cast doubt on the official explanation
[i]And shepherds we shall be, for thee my Lord for thee, Power hath descended forth from thy hand, that our feet may swiftly carry out thy command, we shall flow a river forth to thee, and teeming with souls shall it ever be. In nomine patris, et fili, et spiritus sancti.[/i]
ToxicBug wrote:Well who else but the government would be behind the controlled demolition?
The fact that you think it was a controlled demolition further cements your position in the Fucking Idiot Hall Of Fame.
TBH, after all the reading I've done, I would have to say that anyone who dismisses the possibility outright is either uninformed of the facts, trying to convince themselves, or just in open denial.
Any reasoning person who has really looked at everything involved with an objective eye would see that what we have been told happened that day was intentionally inaccurate.
ToxicBug wrote:Well who else but the government would be behind the controlled demolition?
The fact that you think it was a controlled demolition further cements your position in the Fucking Idiot Hall Of Fame.
the evidence says different
(about the controlled demo that is, not about toxicbug. i think that issue is beyond question)
edit: let me put it this way: there are two competing explanations for what happened to the WTC:
* (the official explanation) that the 6 steel columns supporting the building were all softened/melted at identical rates by the burning jet fuel so as to cause a perfectly symmetrical collapse of two buildings within less that 90 minutes (an event unheard of in the history of modern construction, and in fact physically impossible); or
* (the conspiracy) that the buildings were 'pulled' by controlled demolition
the actual evidence doesn't support the official explanation in any way. take a look at the movie for the details. also have a look here:
Best part of the video has to be the part describing the underside of one of the plains hitting the TWC. The part where it slows the video frames down to provide indisputable evidence about some attachment, which must have been attached by aliens in area 51 or that mountain they keep the stargate in.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
