Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
jester!
Posts: 969 Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:55 am
Post
by jester! Mon Jan 16, 2006 8:58 am
Who said ditch the Q3 stuff?
MKJ
Posts: 32582 Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by MKJ Mon Jan 16, 2006 9:06 am
o'dium wrote:
actually, that only applies to you
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
I cant spell u
Posts: 1328 Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:00 am
Post
by I cant spell u Mon Jan 16, 2006 5:50 pm
jester! wrote: Who said ditch the Q3 stuff?
I didn't say ditch it, but I'd like it better if it had its own unique multiplayer rather then quake 3 on doom 3 engine.
R00k
Posts: 15188 Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by R00k Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:29 pm
o'dium wrote: lol, thats why devs have such a hard time. They dont listen and people hate it. They listen, and people hate it. Cant win.
LOL no shit, you're the biggest offender of them all.
jester!
Posts: 969 Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:55 am
Post
by jester! Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:30 pm
Meh, I think that there is a perfect implementation of a FPS game, and the Quake series though different between each version have many aspects that fit into that perfect form, as such there isnt going to be a completely unique game, especially since it would alienate loads of the established player base.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175 Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
Post
by +JuggerNaut+ Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:33 pm
rofl, that's sig material odium. primaltheory will be all over that.
