Where were you when the West was defeated?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/doncarlos83][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gbar/doncarlos83.gif[/img][/url]
na, bugs will be fixed with firmware and hotfixs. my mates just ordered his and i'm putting in a rec for one next week. just had a duel screen x64 dell put on my desk so best not to put another £2000 order in
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
yeah, the MacBook is sick. this might push me over the edge. the magnetic power plug is a simple but good idea too. steve's claiming 4-5X faster performance than the Powerbooks - pretty hefty.
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:yeah, the MacBook is sick. this might push me over the edge. the magnetic power plug is a simple but good idea too. steve's claiming 4-5X faster performance than the Powerbooks - pretty hefty.
lol.. don't buy into the hype man.. it's maybe 2.5x faster--given the extra core and another percentage bump for architecture if that offers a performance boost.
I'm wondering how they get more performance when the OS was designed to run on a whole different chip architecture, RISC vs CISC. Seems to me they would have to redo a ton of OS stuff to get good performance out of the deep queues in the intel chips.
MidnightQ4 wrote:I'm wondering how they get more performance when the OS was designed to run on a whole different chip architecture, RISC vs CISC. Seems to me they would have to redo a ton of OS stuff to get good performance out of the deep queues in the intel chips.
The OS was designed from the beginning to be portable. Since the conception of OS X they had it running natively on both x86 and PPC. That is why they were able to make this transition so rapidly and with such seemless results.
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:yeah, the MacBook is sick. this might push me over the edge. the magnetic power plug is a simple but good idea too. steve's claiming 4-5X faster performance than the Powerbooks - pretty hefty.
lol.. don't buy into the hype man.. it's maybe 2.5x faster--given the extra core and another percentage bump for architecture if that offers a performance boost.
my "pretty hefty" remark was directed towards the claim.
I'm sure some folks will find a way to either emulate a mac or hack up OS X to get it running, but it will be a royal pain in the ass, unstable as all hell, and updates will kill the install, etc. so it just wont be worth the effort.