Enough

Post by **DRuM** » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:10 pm

I am happy to go along with what you said prince. Banning isn't necessary but ffs, someone should try and do something to reduce the yawn inducing political threads and the constant thread posting by his truly. Politics is fine, but everything in moderation eh.

Post by **prince1000** » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:11 pm

then take it up with the mods..

Post by **DRuM** » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:13 pm

I already did. Talking to my front door would have had an equal result.

Post by **Jackal** » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:28 pm

Either ban him or only allow him to make 1 topic a day.

Post by **DRuM** » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:39 pm

Jackal wrote:Either ban him or only allow him to make 1 topic a day.

This man speaks sense.

Post by **mrd** » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:43 pm

DRuM wrote:I already did. Talking to my front door would have had an equal result.

Hah. That was actually FUNNY! :icon34:

Post by **R00k** » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:44 pm

I'm not for banning, but I could go with the 1 topic per day, definitely. :icon14:

Post by **Dave** » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:56 pm

Who cares? If you don't like it, ignore it. Most of his threads start out with an insult directed at his post and eventuall turn into a somewhat on-topic discussion about his link.

Post by **tnf** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:16 am

plained wrote:jelez

fuc u

crushed

i was waiting for the plained spin on the goof talk...

:icon14:

Post by **tnf** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:17 am

Dave wrote:Who cares? If you don't like it, ignore it. Most of his threads start out with an insult directed at his post and eventuall turn into a somewhat on-topic discussion about his link.

i think what annoys most is the spamming and trolling of other threads, but many of those people spam and troll other threads too...so i agree with this 'ignore' mantra you espouse...

Post by **DRuM** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:40 am

Yea nice one dave. Obviously the few of us speaking up who are also regular posters to q3w, some of which are quite valuable contributors, that are making it clear we don't like geoffs constant shite, and no doubt countless others who won't say anything that also think the same, aren't worth listening to. Cool! When someone else spams in the future but actually get's banned because YOU don't like them, I'm sure you'll be able to rustle up an appropriate excuse to justify yourself. Are there actually any rules here at all these days? Do we even need mods in a dying forum with no rules but allows spam now? Hey I guess not! Is it even worth asking the mods and admins to at least help out if not ban someone? Of course not! Lol

Post by **DRuM** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:41 am

That is all

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:42 am

rofl, that's a long post Drummeh

Post by **DRuM** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:45 am

I know, my virus scan is taking ages so I can't play teh kwack3, so I took the time to add more words to my post of mutiny.

Post by **farad** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:46 am

...pussys...I love me some freakster...

Post by **Foo** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:47 am

DRuM wrote:Yea nice one dave. Obviously the few of us speaking up who are also regular posters to q3w, some of which are quite valuable contributors, that are making it clear we don't like geoffs constant shite, and no doubt countless others who won't say anything that also think the same, aren't worth listening to. Cool! When someone else spams in the future but actually get's banned because YOU don't like them, I'm sure you'll be able to rustle up an appropriate excuse to justify yourself. Are there actually any rules here at all these days? Do we even need mods in a dying forum with no rules but allows spam now? Hey I guess not! Is it even worth asking the mods and admins to at least help out if not ban someone? Of course not! Lol

Settle down drama fag.

Throw someone out because you and like 2 other people want them out? No. Although alluding to there being more people who are dumb enough to thing banning people just becuase you dislike the content/style/theme of their posts, and that they're just too 'scared' to say so is pretty funny.

Post by **DRuM** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:59 am

Perhaps you should read posts a bit more thoroughly before you type foo. We decided that reducing the amount of threads by geoff would be good enough. I personally don't care about banning anymore. It was good enough for you to edit his posts in your forum because of something you didn't like, but if some others don't like something by geoff then you feel the need to defend him. Lol?
You also dont know what other people that don't post are actually thinking so your flippant remark has no real ground.
There was also nothing in my post suggesting people are 'scared' because they don't post. :icon27:

Post by **DiscoDave** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 1:09 am

Limit how many threads Geoff makes or ban him completly. I dont care as long as something gets done. I've been posing here since i was about 16 and enjoy this forum. People like Geoff just degrade it.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 1:27 am

If goof is forbidden from posting links, the words "moron(s)", "bush", "iran", "war", "lol", "any", "questions", "rofl", "...", and "?", then his posts would be fine.

Post by **DiscoDave** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 1:46 am

ToxicBug wrote:If goof is forbidden from posting links, the words "moron(s)", "bush", "iran", "war", "lol", "any", "questions", "rofl", "...", and "?", then his posts would be fine.

if he was forbidden to post any of those words he wouldn't post anything. Then again, I wont compain.

Post by **Foo** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 1:54 am

DRuM wrote:Perhaps you should read posts a bit more thoroughly before you type foo. We decided that reducing the amount of threads by geoff would be good enough. I personally don't care about banning anymore.

Who gives a shit whether you're pressing for it anymore or not? It's the notion that you think you should be able to call that that's laughable.

It was good enough for you to edit his posts in your forum because of something you didn't like

I edit Geoff's posts wherever he flames or trolls in Q4D. Most of the edits are riddla at the moment, cause he's a lot faster than me. I don't edit his posts unless he's trolling or flaming, sadly that seems to be about all he does in Q4D for the most part.

You seem to have a real hard on for telling people how they should be handling their responsibilities, despite not having any of your own.

but if some others don't like something by geoff then you feel the need to defend him. Lol?
You also dont know what other people that don't post are actually thinking so your flippant remark has no real ground.
There was also nothing in my post suggesting people are 'scared' because they don't post. :icon27:

Lol fucking hell, way to try and turn this around. You're the moron who tried to invent popular support for your argument by pretending you did "know what other people that don't post are actually thinking". Right here:

and no doubt countless others who won't say anything that also think the same

Moron alert?

Post by **Tormentius** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 1:54 am

Foo wrote:
Settle down drama fag.

Throw someone out because you and like 2 other people want them out? No. Although alluding to there being more people who are dumb enough to thing banning people just becuase you dislike the content/style/theme of their posts, and that they're just too 'scared' to say so is pretty funny.

Just by looking through this thread alone there appears to be more than two that are sick of the spam and repetition. IMO it should be restricted to QWFix with the rest of the spam.

Post by **Foo** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 2:02 am

Tormentius wrote:
Foo wrote:
Settle down drama fag.

Throw someone out because you and like 2 other people want them out? No. Although alluding to there being more people who are dumb enough to thing banning people just becuase you dislike the content/style/theme of their posts, and that they're just too 'scared' to say so is pretty funny.
Just by looking through this thread alone there appears to be more than two that are sick of the spam and repetition. IMO it should be restricted to QWFix with the rest of the spam.

Looking through the thread I count 2 people plus drum who actually think he should be banned. Everyone else seems to be taking infinitely less stupid stances.

Since it's clear from my post you quoted that that is what I was referring to, I don't see why you bothered quoting me to make your point, since it's clearly an entirely different point.

Post by **Tormentius** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 2:06 am

Foo wrote:
Looking through the thread I count 2 people plus drum who actually think he should be banned. Everyone else seems to be taking infinitely less stupid stances.

Since it's clear from my post you quoted that that is what I was referring to, I don't see why you bothered quoting me to make your point, since it's clearly an entirely different point.

The point is that there are obviously a fair number of people who are sick of wading through his ramblings. This isn't the first thread about this and you know it.

Post by **booker** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 2:08 am

this is all freakoff has