Any attempt to add balance to these articles is met by severe censoring and shouting down or shutting down editors. I suggest people sign up (free and anonymous) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Userlogin) and start politely editing. Once there, to gain "credibility" I suggest you look around and then for the first few days edit only uncontroversial articles for grammar or choppiness or poor citation - you will then be seen as a neutral editor (everyone is an "editor"). I suggest using a different screen name than you do at FR.
Don't these losers have anything better to do? Oh, I guess all the imaginary homosexual television characters have already been dealt with. :icon27:
"The abortion page is better, but it still slants in favor of abortion (if actually read the article)."
just read the article on abortion and i can't see what this guy's getting at
granted, it doesn't say "ABOORTION ISA CRIIME AGGINST GAWD AND YEWILL BE STRUCK DOWN *flying spittle, profuse sweating, rolling eyes* FER DOING IT" anywhere
- but that's an opinion, not a fact - the article describes what the word abortion means - what more should an encyclopedia do?
What a bunch of fucking idiots. Yeah, I guess it's a "free republic" only if you think EXACTLY like they do. And I loved the post about "lefty academic" types having more free time than "conservatives with real jobs". Yup, only true christians that hate gays have real jobs.
4days wrote:"The abortion page is better, but it still slants in favor of abortion (if actually read the article)."
just read the article on abortion and i can't see what this guy's getting at
granted, it doesn't say "ABOORTION ISA CRIIME AGGINST GAWD AND YEWILL BE STRUCK DOWN *flying spittle, profuse sweating, rolling eyes* FER DOING IT" anywhere
- but that's an opinion, not a fact - the article describes what the word abortion means - what more should an encyclopedia do?
Oh, you must have missed the part where the liberal conspiracy has implied that abortions can happen naturally, by definition; and where they slid in the lollipops-and-gumdrops word "elective abortion," instead of using the accurate, objective term "baby-slaughtering."
