85% of people polled on MSNBC are for impeachment...

Post by **tnf** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 8:05 am

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904/

According to that non-scientific poll. 140,000+ responses, though. I was surprised it was that high myself. Wonder what the results would have been if that poll was posted on fox.

Although you can't read too much into those #'s, I think it is a pretty strong statement as to the public's current opinion of GWB.

Post by **Canis** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 8:09 am

I would dearly love to see an impeachment proceding/escalation prevent any further progress of Bush's agenda, mar his "legacy" as the president, and render him and his cabinet untrustworthy.

Post by **bitWISE** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 8:10 am

Didn't someone point out that the last poll was very easily hackable with javascript?

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 8:11 am

not "easily", but yes, just like anything else online. nothing is unhackable.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 8:12 am

also, i agree 100% with Canis.

Post by **Canis** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 8:15 am

Here's something interesting: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1439261

I didnt know they were storing telecommunications data since the 9/11 attacks, and were combing through it in this "executive order"...

Post by **Canis** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 8:28 am

The radiation scannings are also adding to the skepticism of activity for national "security": http://www.latimes.com/business/la-na-m ... k=morenews

I wonder how they will affect people's positions on impeachment.

Post by **Canis** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 8:33 am

Unfortunately, and not surprisingly, they've already got the ball rolling on the defense: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... Id=5068178

According to some, Bush can't be touched, and I'd expect this would be exploited such that a few minions and their managers get the heat for this.

Post by ek » Sat Dec 24, 2005 10:53 am

it's a fucking shame. the cunt seems to be the dumbest and worst president the US has had. like me and my mate were discussing, who gives a fuck about the opinion polls anymore, there wont be no 3rd term anyway, bush can do whatever the hell he wants, especially if he cant be impeached.

Post by **hax103** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 3:05 pm

bitWISE wrote:Didn't someone point out that the last poll was very easily hackable with javascript?

Yes. One IP address can vote as many times as you want - takes about 5 minutes to write a script by anyone who has a little programming knowledge. Its really as silly as the "Which game is better smackdown" votes.

Is there any possibility for Bush to get a congressional censure? (I was just watching a ripped West Wing episode where Sheen got one).

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 3:28 pm

if they impeach bush then cheney is president...if they impeach cheney then hastur is president...moron alert???...

Post by **Foo** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 3:32 pm

Who suceeds him doesn't matter, it's the act of impeachment that's significant.

Boron inert?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 3:34 pm

win a false victory might mean something for a moron like u...

Post by **Foo** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 3:59 pm

Freakaloin wrote:win a false victory might mean something for a moron like u...

You dont think impeachment is a significant event?

Doesn't it give government more license if no matter what they do, the president doesn't get impeached?

What you're saying means impeachment is pointless and would never be useful. Why have it or bother talking about it at all, ever?

NE Questions?

Post by **Nightshade** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 4:01 pm

Freakaloin wrote:if they impeach bush then cheney is president...if they impeach cheney then hastur is president...moron alert???...

Wrong as usual, stupid. If Bush gets impeached it's still up to the Senate to actually do something. Clinton was impeached, nothing happened.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 4:24 pm

i meant completely impeached...

Post by **mik0rs** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 4:37 pm

Post by **Massive Quasars** » Sun Dec 25, 2005 3:21 pm

Foo wrote:Boron inert?

i lol'ed audibly

Post by **booker** » Mon Dec 26, 2005 4:41 am

good luck

Post by **Canis** » Mon Dec 26, 2005 5:35 am

Massive Quasars wrote:
Foo wrote:Boron inert?
i lol'ed audibly

Isnt the fact that its "audible" part of what "lol" stands for?

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Mon Dec 26, 2005 8:29 am

Canis wrote:
Massive Quasars wrote:
Foo wrote:Boron inert?
i lol'ed audibly
Isnt the fact that its "audible" part of what "lol" stands for?

technically, but it's so overused that it's not what happens most of the time.

Post by **Massive Quasars** » Mon Dec 26, 2005 8:38 am

essentially

ty jugg

Post by **Canis** » Mon Dec 26, 2005 8:40 am

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
Canis wrote:
Massive Quasars wrote: i lol'ed audibly
Isnt the fact that its "audible" part of what "lol" stands for?
technically, but it's so overused that it's not what happens most of the time.

yeah, though I've resorted to "heh", ":icon26:", or ":icon25:" for that...

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Mon Dec 26, 2005 8:42 am

Post by **Geebs** » Mon Dec 26, 2005 9:54 am

This is basically proof that people are morons who deserve to get what they vote for.