Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
tnf
Posts: 13010 Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am
Post
by tnf » Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:21 am
i've had pages of that hanging in my classroom for 4 years.
werldhed
Posts: 4926 Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am
Post
by werldhed » Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:27 am
tnf, have you ever seen the 1971 video "Protein Synthesis: An epic on the cellular level"?
I just saw it a couple weeks ago...absolutely crazy. It blew my mind like only a drug induced orgy of biochemists can.
Bdw3
Posts: 3348 Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Bdw3 » Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:28 am
About the only thing I do remember from my 8th grade science class. :icon14:
tnf
Posts: 13010 Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am
Post
by tnf » Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:32 am
werldhed wrote: tnf, have you ever seen the 1971 video "Protein Synthesis: An epic on the cellular level"?
I just saw it a couple weeks ago...absolutely crazy. It blew my mind like only a drug induced orgy of biochemists can.
haven't seen that one. might have to look it up.
I'm in the process of ordering Richard Dawkin's DVD version of the Ancestor's Tale. Great stuff.
werldhed
Posts: 4926 Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am
Post
by werldhed » Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:53 am
It's great. It's about 15 minutes long and introduced by Paul Berg (iirc). If you can find it you should check it out.
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216 Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
Post
by [xeno]Julios » Tue Dec 20, 2005 4:24 am
nice video - i'm almost certain i saw it about 15 years ago at some disney land type place or something.
reminds me of the question about folding a thin sheet of paper in half, 100 times.
the resultant thickness will be about the radius of the universe (14 billion lightyears)
Canis
Posts: 3798 Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am
Post
by Canis » Tue Dec 20, 2005 5:17 am
...and I was hoping for exponents. :icon8:
Dave
Posts: 6986 Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Dave » Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:12 am
lawl. we watched this in my astronomy class. never knew the name of it though
bitWISE
Posts: 10704 Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am
Post
by bitWISE » Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:51 am
Cool clip. Sucks the quality is so low on google because I hadn't seen it before.
mjrpes
Posts: 4980 Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by mjrpes » Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:18 am
[xeno]Julios wrote: nice video - i'm almost certain i saw it about 15 years ago at some disney land type place or something.
reminds me of the question about folding a thin sheet of paper in half, 100 times.
the resultant thickness will be about the radius of the universe (14 billion lightyears)
Chuck Norris did that once. He could have folded it again but it would have defied comprehension.
glossy
Posts: 2285 Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 7:00 am
Post
by glossy » Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:09 pm
Canis wrote: ...and I was hoping for exponents. :icon8:
it's not? damn.
Guest
Post
by Guest » Wed Dec 21, 2005 2:15 am
[xeno]Julios wrote: nice video - i'm almost certain i saw it about 15 years ago at some disney land type place or something.
reminds me of the question about folding a thin sheet of paper in half, 100 times.
the resultant thickness will be about the radius of the universe (14 billion lightyears)
I don't get it, how long is the sheet exactly?
BlueGene
Posts: 623 Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 2:09 am
Post
by BlueGene » Wed Dec 21, 2005 2:52 am
You know how you can only fold a regular piece of paper several times before it becomes unfoldable? Something a long these lines is what I think xeno is talking about.
Since your doubling the height every fold?
Guest
Post
by Guest » Wed Dec 21, 2005 3:34 am
Even if I tripled the height with every fold, if the piece of paper was 0.1mm thick, 0.1*100³=100m. If it was 1mm thick (that is one fucking thick piece of paper), it would be 1km.
Chupacabra
Posts: 3783 Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2001 7:00 am
Post
by Chupacabra » Wed Dec 21, 2005 3:39 am
ToxicBug wrote: Even if I tripled the height with every fold, if the piece of paper was 0.1mm thick, 0.1*100³=100m. If it was 1mm thick (that is one fucking thick piece of paper), it would be 1km.
isnt it more like 3^100 (or 2^100 in julios's case)? or maybe im mistaken?
Last edited by
Chupacabra on Wed Dec 21, 2005 3:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
werldhed
Posts: 4926 Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am
Post
by werldhed » Wed Dec 21, 2005 3:39 am
Sort of, but it doesn't have anything to do with being ubable to fold in half. It's all about doubling the thickness each time.
Pick an arbitrary number for the width of paper... say 0.000001 meters. Multiply that by 2^100 and that's the thickness of your result, in meters.
edit: oops...meant to be directed at Bluegene
edit2: Chupacabra has it right
Guest
Post
by Guest » Wed Dec 21, 2005 3:41 am
Chupacabra wrote: ToxicBug wrote: Even if I tripled the height with every fold, if the piece of paper was 0.1mm thick, 0.1*100³=100m. If it was 1mm thick (that is one fucking thick piece of paper), it would be 1km.
isnt it more like 3^100 (or 2^100 in julios's case)? or maybe im mistaken?
Oh, ic.
sliver
Posts: 898 Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 12:25 am
Post
by sliver » Wed Dec 21, 2005 6:38 am
[xeno]Julios wrote: nice video - i'm almost certain i saw it about 15 years ago at some disney land type place or something.
reminds me of the question about folding a thin sheet of paper in half, 100 times.
the resultant thickness will be about the radius of the universe (14 billion lightyears)
I remember seeing it at the [Ontario] Science Centre when I was little, so that's probably what you're thinking of.