brits...the original morons...

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
Freakaloin
Posts: 10620
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

brits...the original morons...

Post by Freakaloin »

jesus...fucking limey bastards...someone drop some bombs on that island please...

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3935
a defining attribute of a government is that it has a monopoly on the legitimate exercise of violence...
User avatar
FragaGeddon
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by FragaGeddon »

Welcome to last week.
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

excellent timing for this story to come out eh.
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36021
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: brits...the original morons...

Post by seremtan »

Freakaloin wrote:jesus...fucking limey bastards...someone drop some bombs on that island please...

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3935
...but save the mother load for fort bening where all the alabama farm boys learn college hazing and how to piss on the koran
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Post by losCHUNK »

someone had to do it
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36021
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Post by seremtan »

btw
An Incredible Day in America

By Martin Garbus

12/17/05 "Huffington Post" -- -- Today, for two separate reasons, has been an incredible day in America. First, the United States has legitimized torture and secondly, the President has admitted to an impeachable offense.

First, the media has been totally misled on the alleged Bush-McCain agreement on torture. McCain capitulated. It is not a defeat for Bush. It is a win for Cheney.

Torture is not banned or in any way impeded.

Under the compromise, anyone charged with torture can defend himself if a "reasonable" person could have concluded they were following a lawful order.

That defense "loophole" totally corrodes the ban. It is the CIA, or the torturing agency, who will decide what a "reasonable" person could have concluded. Can you imagine those agencies in the interrogation business torturing on their own in trying to decide what is reasonable or what is not? What is not "reasonable" if the interrogator (wrongfully or rightfully) believes he has a ticking-bomb situation? Will a CIA or military officer issue a narrow order if he knows his interrogator believes, in this case, torture will work?

The Bush-McCain torture compromise legitimizes torture. It is the first time that has happened in this country. Not in the two World Wars, Korea, the Cold War or Vietnam did the government ever seek or get the power this bill gives them.

The worst part of it is that most of the media missed it and got it wrong.

Secondly, the President in authorizing surveillance without seeking a court order has committed a crime. The Federal Communications Act criminalizes surveillance without a warrant. It is an impeachable offense. This was also totally missed by the media.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e11320.htm
Post Reply