jews and math...

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:12 pm

Freakaloin wrote:all those numbers r prolly just deaths...most weren't killed...they just died from typhoid or what not...along with germans and everyone else too...

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:13 pm

which Germans were in the concentration camps geoff?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:14 pm

the ones running them moron...

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:16 pm

Freakaloin wrote:.but in the concentration camps the germans were dying in large numbers from typhoid.

?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:16 pm

whats hard to understand? see if u have 10 ppl and 6 die from typhoid...thats a large percentage of those 10 ppl...

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:17 pm

so roughly 80% of the staff of the concentration camps died from disease and whatnot.

you heard it here first from geoff

LOL

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:18 pm

disease causilty numbers for allied forces in europe and the pacific were over 50%...why not 80% in a filthy camp?

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:19 pm

where is your source?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:20 pm

history channel for what i just talked about...

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:23 pm

that's specific and verifiable

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:24 pm

what a moron...

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:26 pm

moron's source things by saying, "I read it in a book" or "I saw it on t.v."

that's you. lol

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:28 pm

morons ask for sources all time and make that the focus of the dicussion...

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:30 pm

so in other words you have no post secondary education and possibly didn't finish high school?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:30 pm

as usual...ur wrong on all counts...cunt...

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:34 pm

sorry you already lost

it's over

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 12:02 am

Freakaloin wrote:disease causilty numbers for allied forces in europe and the pacific were over 50%...why not 80% in a filthy camp?

oh i don't think i can let this go either

http://www.va.gov/OAA/pocketcard/worldwar_summary.asp
The advent of antibiotics began with the use of sulfonamides in the mid-1930's, hence the troops had the benefits of sulfa and penicillin to treat both disease and wound infections. They also benefited from the availability of blood transfusions, aeromedical evacuation, better burn management, synthetic antimalarials and DDT, and a wide range of preventive measures including immunizations against yellow fever, cholera, plague, influenza, typhus, typhoid and tetanus. The result was an up to then extraordinary 4% died-of-wounds rate for British and American troops, (this rate was later reduced to 2.5% in Vietnam) and death rates from disease markedly below the killed-in-action rate. Mortality did not tell the entire story. Morbidity from such diseases as tuberculosis (anti-tuberculous agents did not begin to appear until 1949), rheumatic fever, hepatitis, and tropical diseases was high, however, and the prime reason for residual disability and time lost from duty.

always wrong geoff. tut tut

Post by **mik0rs** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 12:07 am

A big number of people still got fucking murdered, it's hardly like the Nazi's (in particular the SS) were any less of the cunts they're made out to be.

Fucking imbecile.