Digital cameras

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
User avatar
FragaGeddon
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am

Digital cameras

Post by FragaGeddon »

My brother's getting a digital camera from the wife for xmas.
What mega pixel do you recommend and what kind?

I was going to recommend at least a 5 megapixel with optical zoom, and probably by Cannon.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

from your wife?
User avatar
FragaGeddon
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by FragaGeddon »

No, I mean from his wife.
User avatar
FragaGeddon
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by FragaGeddon »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:from your wife?
My palm dosen't give out xmas presents.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

i think you'd get a more streamlined response by posting the $$ limit.
User avatar
FragaGeddon
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by FragaGeddon »

Probbaly around $300ish Canadian.
werldhed
Posts: 4926
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am

Post by werldhed »

It depends on how avid of a photographer he is. If it's just casual "trips to the in-laws" use, then he won't even need 5.0mpxl. 4.0 is probably fine.
If he wants enlargements, then go for 5.0 or higher.

Canon digicams are great, but check the red-eye quality. That's the only problem mine has. Typically, you don't even need to use a flash with digital cameras, so it's not such a big deal.
User avatar
FragaGeddon
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by FragaGeddon »

Actually my Kodak 2 MP has redeye reduction.
I though all cameras now would have this feature.
werldhed
Posts: 4926
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am

Post by werldhed »

Oh, it has red-eye reduction. It just doesn't work well. I've used some other Canons that have the same problem. Like I said though, I don't typically use the flash, so it's not a big problem.
Guest

Post by Guest »

werldhed wrote:Oh, it has red-eye reduction. It just doesn't work well. I've used some other Canons that have the same problem. Like I said though, I don't typically use the flash, so it's not a big problem.
To remove red eye you need either a secondary light source on the camera (usually a little lamp that lights up before u take the pic) or just get an external flash, so it will be a lot higher than the lens.
User avatar
FragaGeddon
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by FragaGeddon »

With mine, it flashes once, then on the second flash it takes a picture.
I think it just helps close the retina to reduce the red eye effect.
werldhed
Posts: 4926
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am

Post by werldhed »

FragaGeddon wrote:With mine, it flashes once, then on the second flash it takes a picture.
I think it just helps close the retina to reduce the red eye effect.
Yeah, that's what mine does. I think the time between the flashes is too short, so it doesn't have much of an effect.
User avatar
duffman91
Posts: 1278
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Digital cameras

Post by duffman91 »

FragaGeddon wrote:My brother's getting a digital camera from the wife for xmas.
What mega pixel do you recommend and what kind?

I was going to recommend at least a 5 megapixel with optical zoom, and probably by Cannon.
My personal opinion:

Stick with either Canon, nikon, or Olympus. 3 megapixels for the casual photographer, 4 megapixels for the enthusiast, and 5 megapixels for the avid enthusiast, 8+ megapixels for professionals.

http://dpreview.com/

^^^ great site to compare cameras.
User avatar
FragaGeddon
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by FragaGeddon »

My brother's looking for a small camera for his daughter that she can fit into her purse, any recommendations?
User avatar
duffman91
Posts: 1278
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by duffman91 »

FragaGeddon wrote:My brother's looking for a small camera for his daughter that she can fit into her purse, any recommendations?
Canon powershot. 3/4/5 megapixels.

between $100 - $150 USD
User avatar
FragaGeddon
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by FragaGeddon »

She has this camera:

Image

So something smaller than that.
User avatar
duffman91
Posts: 1278
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by duffman91 »

FragaGeddon wrote:She has this camera:

Image

So something smaller than that.
Kodak sucks.

Also, Canon Powershot

Image

it doesn't get any smaller than that.
User avatar
FragaGeddon
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by FragaGeddon »

User avatar
FragaGeddon
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by FragaGeddon »

I'm guessing if a camera dosen't have manual focus, than it dosen't have optical zoom.
User avatar
FragaGeddon
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by FragaGeddon »

I got the camera from work, so I got it at cost.
The Kodak one, that is.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

ToxicBug wrote:
werldhed wrote:Oh, it has red-eye reduction. It just doesn't work well. I've used some other Canons that have the same problem. Like I said though, I don't typically use the flash, so it's not a big problem.
To remove red eye you need either a secondary light source on the camera (usually a little lamp that lights up before u take the pic) or just get an external flash, so it will be a lot higher than the lens.
lol
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
phantasmagoria
Posts: 8525
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am

Post by phantasmagoria »

red eye is caused by the camera catching a glimpse of inner demons that the naked eye normally cannot see.
[size=85]
Post Reply