so blair is actually gayer then bush even?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 12:54 pm

the moron not only follows the gayest man in the world around like a poodle, he uses his moronic country's tabloids to try and convince his limey population to bomb iran...gg...

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms. ... ry_id=3268

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 3:17 pm

can guarantee if blair goes for iran there will be a lot more than a few protests

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 4:09 pm

and alot more dead brits...

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 4:42 pm

thats jus saying that relations are breaking down though innit ?

which is like, nothing new

Post by **seremtan** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:27 pm

all utterly predictable of course

the only source we have for this claim the iranians backed the bombings of uk soldiers in basra is *drum roll* the british government

and check this:

Without any increase in public concern over Iran’s nuclear ambitions, British threats to support military action against Iran are hollow. And there is no better way to drum up anger than by telling the public that the Iranians are responsible for the deaths of British soldiers.

translation: it's a big fat dirty fucking lie, but it might work

Post by **seremtan** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:30 pm

Freakaloin wrote:the moron not only follows the gayest man in the world around like a poodle, he uses his moronic country's tabloids to try and convince his limey population to bomb iran...gg...

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms. ... ry_id=3268

u fat yanks r 10x gayer than us, and ur president is the king of gay

*titty dance*

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:32 pm

if it wasn't for us hitler would have crushed ur pansy asses in the battle of britian...can't win on ur own?

Post by **4days** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:05 pm

ffs, you lot and the war is like us winning the world cup in '66. get something right ONE TIME and never ever stop bleating about it.

Post by **redfella** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 9:50 pm

Freakaloin wrote:if it wasn't for us hitler would have crushed ur pansy asses in the battle of britian...can't win on ur own?

hrmm... Stop making us look like assholes.

Post by **seremtan** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 12:18 am

Freakaloin wrote:if it wasn't for us hitler would have crushed ur pansy asses in the battle of britian...can't win on ur own?

it was 3000 british and polish spitfire and hurricane pilots who won the battle of britain, dumbass. your arkansas farmboys were still on the farm in 1940, reading about pearl harbor in the hicksville gazette

at least the ones who could read were

Post by **losCHUNK** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 12:21 am

and we had like a 3rd of what the krauts sent at us

Post by **losCHUNK** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 12:22 am

and russia saved both our asses

Post by **seremtan** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:01 am

redfella wrote:
Freakaloin wrote:if it wasn't for us hitler would have crushed ur pansy asses in the battle of britian...can't win on ur own?
hrmm... Stop making us look like assholes.

too late

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 12:21 pm

seremtan wrote:
Freakaloin wrote:if it wasn't for us hitler would have crushed ur pansy asses in the battle of britian...can't win on ur own?
it was 3000 british and polish spitfire and hurricane pilots who won the battle of britain, dumbass. your arkansas farmboys were still on the farm in 1940, reading about pearl harbor in the hicksville gazette

at least the ones who could read were

yeah thanks to america supplying u helpless morons...without us germany would have owned the fuck out of u loosers...

Post by **hate** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 12:34 pm

they have short memories

blame their education system

Post by **GONNAFISTYA** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 12:50 pm

Freakaloin wrote: yeah thanks to america supplying u helpless morons...without us germany would have owned the fuck out of u loosers...

Yeah...and without help from France the Brits would have smashed you in the war of independance.

Post by **GONNAFISTYA** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 12:51 pm

hate wrote:they have short memories

blame their education system

Oh yeah...according to O'Reilly France is now your enemy.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:25 pm

GONNAFISTYA wrote:
Freakaloin wrote: yeah thanks to america supplying u helpless morons...without us germany would have owned the fuck out of u loosers...
Yeah...and without help from France the Brits would have smashed you in the war of independance.

that doesn't count...its been too long...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:26 pm

GONNAFISTYA wrote:
hate wrote:they have short memories

blame their education system
Oh yeah...according to O'Reilly France is now your enemy.

just his enemy...

Post by **GONNAFISTYA** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:43 pm

Freakaloin wrote:
GONNAFISTYA wrote:
Freakaloin wrote: yeah thanks to america supplying u helpless morons...without us germany would have owned the fuck out of u loosers...
Yeah...and without help from France the Brits would have smashed you in the war of independance.
that doesn't count...its been too long...

So I guess 50 years isn't too long? So which arbitrary cut off date would you set?

:icon27:

Post by **losCHUNK** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:46 pm

Freakaloin wrote:
seremtan wrote:
Freakaloin wrote:if it wasn't for us hitler would have crushed ur pansy asses in the battle of britian...can't win on ur own?
it was 3000 british and polish spitfire and hurricane pilots who won the battle of britain, dumbass. your arkansas farmboys were still on the farm in 1940, reading about pearl harbor in the hicksville gazette

at least the ones who could read were
yeah thanks to america supplying u helpless morons...without us germany would have owned the fuck out of u loosers...

america was doing what its good at, keeping an eye on its interests

because you were all a bunch o pussies and didnt wanna join in on the war but also knew that if britain was run by krauts america will be boned

they done the best possible thing they could do, send us scones and teabags

so blair is actually gayer then bush even?

so blair is actually gayer then bush even?

Re: so blair is actually gayer then bush even?