Some new stock pictures

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:44 am

What do you guys think?

Post by **-Replicant-** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:45 am

very, very nice

Post by **mjrpes** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:45 am

iNice

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:46 am

well done.

Post by **AmIdYfReAk** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:47 am

the bottom one looks like a lamp that has seen its day..

Post by **SoM** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:10 am

wow, someone pointed a camera at an object and pressed a button

Post by **glossy** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:11 am

mjrpes wrote:iNice

:icon26:

Post by **AmIdYfReAk** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:11 am

SoM wrote:wow, someone pointed a camera at an object and pressed a button

For further information in reguards to this, please follow the link provided. thank you.

http://quake3world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12365

Post by **mjrpes** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:22 am

SoM wrote:wow, someone pointed a camera at an object and pressed a button

It's a little bit more to it than that... and the outcome is very iNice.

Post by **andyman** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:15 am

Some of the pics are blurry...is it supposed to be like that?

Post by **[xeno]Julios** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:22 am

andyman wrote:Some of the pics are blurry...is it supposed to be like that?

I only see 2 pics.

How can some of them be blurry?

Post by **andyman** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:24 am

both hav ethe back end of the item in the picture blurry (?)

Post by **mjrpes** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:29 am

[xeno]Julios wrote:
andyman wrote:Some of the pics are blurry...is it supposed to be like that?
I only see 2 pics.

How can some of them be blurry?

LMFAO

Post by **mrd** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:43 am

andyman wrote:both hav ethe back end of the item in the picture blurry (?)

That's unavoidable, I assume, as the focus point is set to the front of the object, which means anything in front of or behind it will turn blurry.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:44 am

andyman wrote:both hav ethe back end of the item in the picture blurry (?)

Yes, its called depth of field and they're supposed to be like that.

Thanks for the good comments guys

Post by **Canis** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:37 am

I like the second one a lot.

Post by **Doombrain** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 10:13 am

boring