F.E.A.R review.

Post by **reefsurfer** » Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:36 pm

http://pc.ign.com/articles/657/657310p1.html

"9.0 Presentation
Excellent production values, but a few holes persist.

9.5 Graphics
It doesn't get much better than this, and the bevy of options make things highly customizable to your rig's capabilities.

9.5 Sound
Gorgeous music, spooky ambient sound, and great sound effects abound.

9.2 Gameplay
Challenging combat, great set pieces, detailed environments, but not a lot of environmental variety.

8.0 Lasting Appeal
The main game is relatively short; multiplayer, while having some neat tricks up its sleeve, won't replace Counter-Strike any time soon.

9.2 OVERALL out of 10"

Post by **Chupacabra** » Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:43 pm

what a terrible name

Post by **o'dium** » Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:43 pm

Chupacabra wrote:what a terrible name

Yes but...

"what a fantastic game."

Loved the demo, cant wait.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:07 pm

old...

Post by **[FTF]Pyro** » Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:10 pm

Chupacabra wrote:what a terrible name

Post by **[FTF]Pyro** » Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:10 pm

reefsurfer wrote:http://pc.ign.com/articles/657/657310p1.html

"9.0 Presentation
Excellent production values, but a few holes persist.

9.5 Graphics
It doesn't get much better than this, and the bevy of options make things highly customizable to your rig's capabilities.

9.5 Sound
Gorgeous music, spooky ambient sound, and great sound effects abound.

9.2 Gameplay
Challenging combat, great set pieces, detailed environments, but not a lot of environmental variety.

8.0 Lasting Appeal
The main game is relatively short; multiplayer, while having some neat tricks up its sleeve, won't replace Counter-Strike any time soon.

9.2 OVERALL out of 10"

I wouldnt trust IGN with a review....... ever.

Post by **o'dium** » Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:12 pm

Ahh shut up... Look at Quake, ohhhhhh, thats really a name that had thought put into it. At least Quake 1 had a point to being called Quake, what did Quake 2/3/4 have to do with it

Dont judge a book by its cover

If you didn't like that demo, fine, your loss.

Post by **o'dium** » Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:12 pm

[FTF]Pyro wrote:
reefsurfer wrote:http://pc.ign.com/articles/657/657310p1.html

"9.0 Presentation
Excellent production values, but a few holes persist.

9.5 Graphics
It doesn't get much better than this, and the bevy of options make things highly customizable to your rig's capabilities.

9.5 Sound
Gorgeous music, spooky ambient sound, and great sound effects abound.

9.2 Gameplay
Challenging combat, great set pieces, detailed environments, but not a lot of environmental variety.

8.0 Lasting Appeal
The main game is relatively short; multiplayer, while having some neat tricks up its sleeve, won't replace Counter-Strike any time soon.

9.2 OVERALL out of 10"

I wouldnt trust IGN with a review....... ever.

Theres always PC Gamer.

What did they give this one, -17%?

"yeah, well this game has guns. Everybody knows HL2 has guns so shy did they bother? That sucks."

Post by **shiznit** » Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:14 pm

Fear was fun online.

[lvlshot]http://img319.imageshack.us/img319/879/feardi018mx.jpg[/lvlshot]

Post by **reefsurfer** » Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:01 pm

shiznit wrote:Fear was fun online.

[lvlshot]http://img319.imageshack.us/img319/879/feardi018mx.jpg[/lvlshot]

I bet it was looser.

Post by **shiznit** » Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:09 pm

I found that image...notice the tag at the bottom.

Post by **reefsurfer** » Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:18 pm

shiznit wrote:I found that image...notice the tag at the bottom.

Thats what they always say cheater...

F.E.A.R review.

F.E.A.R review.

Re: F.E.A.R review.

Re: F.E.A.R review.