member the good ole days when breaking the law meant jail?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 2:41 pm

guess that doesn't apply nemore...

http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/10 ... aw-by.html

Post by **seremtan** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:09 pm

lol, as if the privately-owned media weren't already providing enough "covert propaganda" for free they have to do this

Post by **Canis** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:27 pm

Good old blogs...what a great source of news!

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:54 pm

so ur saying getting the news from the msm is a better source? rofl...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:55 pm

btw moron...that blogs source for that story is the nytimes...

rofl..idiot...

Post by **glossy** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:56 pm

Canis wrote:Good old blogs...what a great source of news!

in fact, the entire point of the article is that normal news networks had a slanted article written by and for the bush administration, then was inserted into the media with no clues toward who the author was (or the author's intentions)

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:08 pm

glossy wrote:
Canis wrote:Good old blogs...what a great source of news!
in fact, the entire point of the article is that normal news networks had a slanted article written by and for the bush administration, then was inserted into the media with no clues toward who the author was (or the author's intentions)

hence canis is a moron...

Post by **Canis** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:12 pm

Freakaloin, what have we all let you konow about the moron bell?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:13 pm

Canis wrote:Freakaloin, what have we all let you konow about the moron bell?

Post by **Canis** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:14 pm

glossy wrote:
Canis wrote:Good old blogs...what a great source of news!
in fact, the entire point of the article is that normal news networks had a slanted article written by and for the bush administration, then was inserted into the media with no clues toward who the author was (or the author's intentions)

I never said it was incorrect at all...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:15 pm

but u did say u were a moron...

Post by **Pext** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:26 pm

lol, brazilian

Post by **glossy** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:42 pm

Canis wrote:
glossy wrote:
Canis wrote:Good old blogs...what a great source of news!
in fact, the entire point of the article is that normal news networks had a slanted article written by and for the bush administration, then was inserted into the media with no clues toward who the author was (or the author's intentions)
I never said it was incorrect at all...

didn't say you were, I was just pointing out the irony, in case you hadn't read the article. Freakaloin is the one doing all the trolling here

Post by **seremtan** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:18 pm

Freakaloin wrote:so ur saying getting the news from the msm is a better source? rofl...

Freakaloin wrote:btw moron...that blogs source for that story is the nytimes...

rofl..idiot...

i like how u contradict ur self here...moron..?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:28 pm

well i only contradicted myself to show the absurdity of canis argument...any other questions?

Post by **Duhard** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:30 pm

lots of noobs round here..school's out??

Post by **Canis** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:45 pm

I had no argument. I mearly mentioned the moron bell was ringing again. That alarm to you is like smoke to a smoke detector...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:10 pm

ur even too stoopid to realize u did have an argument...rofl...

Post by **seremtan** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 7:42 pm

Duhard wrote:lots of noobs round here..school's out??

why - you cruising for a piece of ass?