RE: ROOk topic on another scale,Engineers welcome Take 2

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 10:04 pm

On the same point of view…
But on a larger scale.
Imagine highways and bridges convert into type of car wash motion type.
Since there is a lot of slow traffic and a lot of accidents…
You get to the bridge or highway entrance and your car embarque on a type of railing till you get to your destination with your motor off at that. You could as well take a nap or watch TV while crossing the bridge or riding the interstate.
And could someone calculate the energy/gas we could save and the polution reduction?
I think this type of transportation would pay off by itself within a very short period of time, not withstanding the death of many people.

Pete

Post by **phantasmagoria** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 10:08 pm

You mean a train?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 10:26 pm

phantasmagoria wrote:You mean a train?

Almost the same but you could have your car on the track and continue to your destination after traveling the interstate or bridge/tunnel
Pete

Post by **Denz** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 10:31 pm

The cost would be too much, but they are coming out with cars that will guide themselves down the highway without any input from the driver.

They are tesing this idea right now in Southern California

Post by **bork[e]** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 2:50 am

I've always been up for new things, but damn. Don't know how happy I would be getting in a "robot" car...though I'm sure the price will be a bit too high anyway on release.

Post by **tnf** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:20 am

wouldn't work or save energy.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:35 pm

tnf wrote:wouldn't work or save energy.

OK then…
Let’s make it a bit more desirable and let’s start with just the bridge/tunnel try.

Let’s say the bridge/tunnel start at the entrance higher and end at a lower point.
So there is a downhill.
Follow me with my frenchglish?

So this mean that once on the track, at the beginning of the bridge/tunnel, we could make this thing works by only gravity from all of the vehicles descending the pat with the help of a type of gearing generator that would keep a constant pace and also generate power with the excess pounds of gravity by the same token.

Ha! Ha!
Try to tell me we can’t make it work now and we wouldn’t save energy.
Not only could we generate more energy but cut on a lot of Gas Emission, Gas reduction because your vehicle would be off, Pollution, and more over no accident, thus less death.
Pete
Please help me on that one and I don’t want to ‘’hear’’read not feasible again.

We just should all work on this thing instead.
This is one of my long ago invention when I was like a teen.
It is not patented. Just wish to share it with the most of people so someone in there with the power and contacts can achieve it for the better of us all.

Pete

Post by **tnf** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:55 pm

pete wrote:
tnf wrote:wouldn't work or save energy.

OK then…
Let’s make it a bit more desirable and let’s start with just the bridge/tunnel try.

Let’s say the bridge/tunnel start at the entrance higher and end at a lower point.
So there is a downhill.
Follow me with my frenchglish?

So this mean that once on the track, at the beginning of the bridge/tunnel, we could make this thing works by only gravity from all of the vehicles descending the pat with the help of a type of gearing generator that would keep a constant pace and also generate power with the excess pounds of gravity by the same token.

Ha! Ha!
Try to tell me we can’t make it work now and we wouldn’t save energy.
Not only could we generate more energy but cut on a lot of Gas Emission, Gas reduction because your vehicle would be off, Pollution, and more over no accident, thus less death.
Pete
Please help me on that one and I don’t want to ‘’hear’’read not feasible again.

We just should all work on this thing instead.
This is one of my long ago invention when I was like a teen.
It is not patented. Just wish to share it with the most of people so someone in there with the power and contacts can achieve it for the better of us all.

Pete

pete knows the physics.

I think you've stumbled across the solution to our fossil fuels crisis.

now if we can just get the governments to start implementing it. luckily, with all the contacts and power here at q3w, that kind of stuff is not a problem.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:12 am

tnf wrote:
pete wrote:
tnf wrote:wouldn't work or save energy.

OK then…
Let’s make it a bit more desirable and let’s start with just the bridge/tunnel try.

Let’s say the bridge/tunnel start at the entrance higher and end at a lower point.
So there is a downhill.
Follow me with my frenchglish?

So this mean that once on the track, at the beginning of the bridge/tunnel, we could make this thing works by only gravity from all of the vehicles descending the pat with the help of a type of gearing generator that would keep a constant pace and also generate power with the excess pounds of gravity by the same token.

Ha! Ha!
Try to tell me we can’t make it work now and we wouldn’t save energy.
Not only could we generate more energy but cut on a lot of Gas Emission, Gas reduction because your vehicle would be off, Pollution, and more over no accident, thus less death.
Pete
Please help me on that one and I don’t want to ‘’hear’’read not feasible again.

We just should all work on this thing instead.
This is one of my long ago invention when I was like a teen.
It is not patented. Just wish to share it with the most of people so someone in there with the power and contacts can achieve it for the better of us all.

Pete
pete knows the physics.

I think you've stumbled across the solution to our fossil fuels crisis.

now if we can just get the governments to start implementing it. luckily, with all the contacts and power here at q3w, that kind of stuff is not a problem.

So
This mean you are with me?
I hope so...No, I know so. This would be an invaluable help/start.
Let's all conjuncture our precious knowledges and all work together. Iknow it's strange coming from just a forum like here but why not?
I love you all.
I know we can make it and altogether we'll make history again.
Pete

Post by **E:v:O** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:01 am

Thats right pete, you made history the first time by inventing the square wheel

Post by **tnf** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:03 am

pete wrote:
So
This mean you are with me?
I hope so...No, I know so. This would be an invaluable help/start.
Let's all conjuncture our precious knowledges and all work together. Iknow it's strange coming from just a forum like here but why not?
I love you all.
I know we can make it and altogether we'll make history again.
Pete

yea, i'll make it happen.

Post by **shadd_** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:11 am

i wanna be the clan leader.

Post by **Foo** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:09 am

Re: Lol

lol

Post by **tnf** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 4:49 am

riddla wrote:lol, nevermind how the vehicle gets to the apex. no energy involved there. lol.

p.s. lol

no no...people will drive UP the hill just to coast down it on a roller...think of the energy we will save!!

Perhaps we can call the theory 'intelligent downhill traveling'.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 21, 2005 12:31 am

Good evening my friends.

Scourge won’t get mad at me since we will find more resourcefull type of meaning with petroleum derivates products; as plastic that already exist and the new plastic type of bridges and may be roads in the near future.
Thing is…I don’t mean this new trend of transportation only to save on energy as fossil types but to help us with a better environment pollution free, accident drop, and we create more energy freely…almost and wouldn’t you prefer to be at your portable PC or watching TV…Rather to be on a hour traffic jam stress and the like.
There are many people wasting like two hours a day for their transportation in between work or just going at your country house.
Any way I think most of you understand my point/project..
Pete

Post by **tnf** » Wed Sep 21, 2005 12:47 am

pete has solved the energy crisis and made the roads a safer place to drive.

even if the whole thing will not work.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 21, 2005 12:49 am

riddla wrote:actually, we seldom understand a fucking thing you ever post.

OK! Sorry, I'll be back after my meal of the day to try to explain it to you.
Pete

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 21, 2005 1:09 am

riddla wrote:actually, we seldom understand a fucking thing you ever post.

Sorry I am not really good at PS or anything like it
Pete

Post by **losCHUNK** » Wed Sep 21, 2005 1:11 am

that rocks

Post by **losCHUNK** » Wed Sep 21, 2005 1:17 am

petes intelligence is clearly on par with a broken snes

so give the guy a kitkat

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 21, 2005 2:08 am

riddla wrote:
losCHUNK wrote:petes intelligence is clearly on par with a broken snes

so give the guy a kitkat
a kitkat has more IQ points

I use to have a kitkat in all my lunch at school but I believe that coffee crisp has more in it.
Pete

Post by **tnf** » Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:15 am

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:09 pm

Also I am not Benjamin Franklin but…
Isn’t there a way to encapsulate the energy force with a type of generator/batteries
when we have violent types of thunder storms.
I read that when a thunder strikes it is hotter than the surface of the sun…Is it true?
Pete

Post by **losCHUNK** » Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:10 pm

Post by **Ryoki** » Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:11 pm

tnf wrote:alt.

Too outrageously weird.