Bush takes responsibility? I wonder what he means by that

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Bush takes responsibility? I wonder what he means by that

Post by R00k »

Bush Takes Responsibility for Failures in Storm Response
http://nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP ... r=homepage

''Katrina exposed serious problems in our response capability at all levels of government,'' Bush said at joint White House news conference with the president of Iraq.

''To the extent the federal government didn't fully do its job right, I take responsibility,'' Bush said.

The president was asked whether people should be worried about the government's ability to handle another terrorist attack given failures in responding to Katrina.

''Are we capable of dealing with a severe attack? That's a very important question and it's in the national interest that we find out what went on so we can better respond,'' Bush replied.

I get the feeling that Bush uses the term responsibility as an abstract concept, and not an action.

I guess it's a foreign word to him, so it's anybody's guess as to what it means.

But it almost sounds to me like he said "I promised to make us secure against terrorists attacks in our country, and I spent billions of your dollars to do it, so it's my fault that we are now just as unprotected as we were to begin with, and all your money has been wasted."

At least, that's what any rational person would mean by such an admission.
Last edited by R00k on Tue Sep 13, 2005 5:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Freakaloin
Posts: 10620
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by Freakaloin »

it means he resigns...
a defining attribute of a government is that it has a monopoly on the legitimate exercise of violence...
shiznit
Posts: 1244
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 4:39 pm

Post by shiznit »

What a fucking moron, politicians should never say that unless they want to be utterly destroyed by public opinion. I wouldn't be suprised if he's out of the white house before Christmas.
Freakaloin
Posts: 10620
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by Freakaloin »

yeah its a sign he is fucked...his advisors r freaking out...
a defining attribute of a government is that it has a monopoly on the legitimate exercise of violence...
neh
Posts: 662
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2001 8:00 am

Post by neh »

lol - sack the thick cunt
hax103
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:04 pm

Post by hax103 »

shiznit wrote:What a fucking moron, politicians should never say that unless they want to be utterly destroyed by public opinion. I wouldn't be suprised if he's out of the white house before Christmas.
Some of us are hoping!
-
old nik (q3w): hack103
shiznit
Posts: 1244
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 4:39 pm

Post by shiznit »

I'm hoping also, but I'm just saying it's dumb for him to admit it. I doubt he will resign but anything can happen.
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

It's not dumb. This is the last line of mitigating the effects of public dissaproval. Now it can be said 'yeah, well, he's admitted to that, so what's your point?' whenever the subject is brought up in any kind of anti-republican context.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Admitting responsibility for something makes a huge difference in public perception over here - at least that's the experience I've seen.

People are only going to start coming down on him a lot harder now that he has admitted being responsible for mistakes.
Chupacabra
Posts: 3783
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Chupacabra »

but see heres the thing...

IT DOESN'T MATTER

i mean really, the country is still going to be as republican as ever. the Fox news people and all the conservatives will someone defend bush about everything and well, yeah, nothings going to happen.
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Pext »

Freakaloin wrote:it means that nothing's gonna happen
fixed that for you...
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Pext »

and it does not matter to him.

the democrats have been anti-bush over the last years. i don't see how this would help them winning the next election.
Big Kahuna Burger
Posts: 2458
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:56 pm

Post by Big Kahuna Burger »

hax103 wrote:
shiznit wrote:What a fucking moron, politicians should never say that unless they want to be utterly destroyed by public opinion. I wouldn't be suprised if he's out of the white house before Christmas.
Some of us are hoping!
me too, i can't wait until Cheney gets full power. no more n_ggers and gays! yes!
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36019
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Bush takes responsibility? I wonder what he means by th

Post by seremtan »

R00k wrote:
...with the president of Iraq...
:icon26:
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

What?
ajerara
Posts: 742
Joined: Thu May 17, 2001 7:00 am

Post by ajerara »

"lol - sack the thick cunt"

we can only hope.......
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

Foo wrote:It's not dumb. This is the last line of mitigating the effects of public dissaproval. Now it can be said 'yeah, well, he's admitted to that, so what's your point?' whenever the subject is brought up in any kind of anti-republican context.
My thoughts exactly.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

I don't think he said it to mitigate further, as much as he said it because he had no choice. I'm sure people have been really fucking hot and heavy on him lately, about all our money he's been spending and getting practically nothing in return -- the proof is in the pudding, and this is what it finally took to show that his policies are failing at their most basic intended purpose. It's obvious to everyone that we responded worse to a domestic disaster than we would have before he took office.
He couldn't mitigate, deny and/or ignore the problems from this catastrophe the way he has been able to with Iraq, which is thousands of miles away. He has no choice but to finally own up to the reality.
busetibi
Posts: 3178
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2000 8:00 am

Post by busetibi »

wait 1,if bush got sacked (can they do that ? ) or impeached (which geoff prays for ) wouldnt that bring Cheney in as president?
this would be better because.......?
serious question here.
Freakaloin
Posts: 10620
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by Freakaloin »

cheney has been dead for 3 years...
a defining attribute of a government is that it has a monopoly on the legitimate exercise of violence...
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

As temporary president, right? And early elections?
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Ryoki wrote:As temporary president, right? And early elections?
Unfortunately, no. :(

I only wish Cheney could get impeached with Bush, but he publicly doesn't do a damn thing, so I can't imagine what would get him in the hot seat - unless it's general secrecy, or his energy task force stuff.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Freakaloin wrote:cheney has been dead for 3 years...
I laughed.
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

R00k wrote:
Ryoki wrote:As temporary president, right? And early elections?
Unfortunately, no. :(
So...what then, the vice president just becomes president for the rest of the term?
Freakaloin
Posts: 10620
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by Freakaloin »

see truman...or lbj...jesus...
a defining attribute of a government is that it has a monopoly on the legitimate exercise of violence...
Post Reply