The question is, can they even prove he was guilty of it?
If they could, I would think they would have offered evidence and convicted his already.
The current situation makes me think he's innocent, but the administration can't let him go after so long without looking like Kim Jong Il.
The worst precedent ever has just been set...
I think I'm fucked. A good friend of mine is staying over night. She's a girl I used to go to school with. We're just friends and all that bullshit but I've always thought she was hot. So we got a little drunk and went to bed. After a while I heard her fart. I thought that was pretty goddamn sexy. Then she did it again. By now I was sporting major wood, and by that I mean all 5 inches of me. I went over to her bed and carefully lifted the blanket over her butt. I pulled out my erection and held it over her boxers, all the while nervous as hell and checking that she was still asleep. Then something terrible happened. She farted again and as soon as the wind brushed over my dick I exploded all over her. I had no idea I had been so close! I've been checking with my celphone's lighted screen and there's cum all over the blanket, in her hair and some on the cushion. I was really lucky that she didn't wake up but I have no idea what will happen in the morning. Will she get what happened? Will she smell it? I don't dare to even try to clean any of it up because I might wake her. If you have any suggestions, please help!
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
― Terry A. Davis
christ, hook up a generator to the spinning founding fathers and you'll have enough juice to power the eastern seaboard. that's another plank of english common law broken. makes one wonder why they even bothered with the magna carta, bill of rights etc. just let those benevolent folks in govt protect our rights since they know best, ehR00k wrote:Apparently that has been overturned by one of the "Activist Judges" the republicons are always ranting about.
I mean, Habeus Corpus is only in our constitution - it's no big deal. We need to worry about those judges who try to let husbands decide the fate of their vegetable-wives, and set nasty precedents upholding people's rights to the pursuit of happiness over the interests of America-nurturing mega-corporations.
-
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
- Posts: 14376
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am
Yeah thats the first thing I read about this subject but I've been careful not to post things that have a lot of spin. I completely agree with the author though.HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:a must read on this subject...
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e10223.htm