Cool, iPod nano

[plained]

nano be gettin big yo i can hardly see it

[hemostick]

You can still reach the mini by fiddling with local applestores (UK store) and whatnot. I presume they'd at least sell the remaining stock, there must be some left.

[mad]

i brought a shuffle a few months ago when it came out
i guess i will be giving that away and getting this now

[Dave]

4GB :\

so a 60GB holds your entire collection? how sad

a 60 would hold about a third of mine

[[xeno]Julios]

2Gb or 4Gb, but very, very small

Not really that much smaller. It's about half as thick as my regular ipod, and not significantly smaller along the other dimensions.


Ipod nano:

3.5 x 1.6 x 0.27

Old ipod:

4.1 x 2.4 x 0.63

hardly worthy of being called nano...

Looks like they've gotten rid of the mini ipod.

[+JuggerNaut+]

4GB :\

so a 60GB holds your entire collection? how sad

a 60 would hold about a third of mine

sure, right now it does.

[JulesWinnfield]

Fatboy Slim.. good taste

[Eraser]

2Gb or 4Gb, but very, very small

Not really that much smaller. It's about half as thick as my regular ipod, and not significantly smaller along the other dimensions.


Ipod nano:

3.5 x 1.6 x 0.27

Old ipod:

4.1 x 2.4 x 0.63

hardly worthy of being called nano...

Looks like they've gotten rid of the mini ipod.

The iPod mini was significantly smaller than the regular ipod. This nano is even smaller than the mini.
But it seems that the mini is completely gone, as 6Gb is a rather nice amount of space.

[glossy]

Fine for a job or summat
Not gonna get through 60 gig of music unless you run round the world

with the 15GB of music in my iTunes library, plus the albums I physically own, i would feel uncomfortable with a 20GB iPod. I'm hoping to get a 40GB soon, to fit all my music comfortably plus the space to use it as a removable harddrive when I need.

so, when your library surpasses the 40GB mark, then what? 60GB? there isn't a player that i know of on the planet that can hold my entire library, so i don't see what the point is to try and carry it.

@ridda: 4GB Flash drive, 1.5 ounces, color screen - that's a ripoff? you're delusional.

i can't see my music library getting to that size anytime within worry. extrapolation places that point at about 2008ish

[+JuggerNaut+]

with the 15GB of music in my iTunes library, plus the albums I physically own, i would feel uncomfortable with a 20GB iPod. I'm hoping to get a 40GB soon, to fit all my music comfortably plus the space to use it as a removable harddrive when I need.

so, when your library surpasses the 40GB mark, then what? 60GB? there isn't a player that i know of on the planet that can hold my entire library, so i don't see what the point is to try and carry it.

@ridda: 4GB Flash drive, 1.5 ounces, color screen - that's a ripoff? you're delusional.

i can't see my music library getting to that size anytime within worry. extrapolation places that point at about 2008ish

i forget alot of you are ok with 128kbps

[killbillisill]

either way 30 gb is bttr than 4, and the size differences aint big, so (my) ipod photo is better than the new nano. there.

[Dave]

so, when your library surpasses the 40GB mark, then what? 60GB? there isn't a player that i know of on the planet that can hold my entire library, so i don't see what the point is to try and carry it.

@ridda: 4GB Flash drive, 1.5 ounces, color screen - that's a ripoff? you're delusional.

i can't see my music library getting to that size anytime within worry. extrapolation places that point at about 2008ish

i forget alot of you are ok with 128kbps

I'm not, which is why my collection is 130 gigs :icon26:

[[xeno]Julios]

2Gb or 4Gb, but very, very small

Not really that much smaller. It's about half as thick as my regular ipod, and not significantly smaller along the other dimensions.


Ipod nano:

3.5 x 1.6 x 0.27

Old ipod:

4.1 x 2.4 x 0.63

hardly worthy of being called nano...

Looks like they've gotten rid of the mini ipod.

The iPod mini was significantly smaller than the regular ipod. This nano is even smaller than the mini.
But it seems that the mini is completely gone, as 6Gb is a rather nice amount of space.

But that would mean that the nano is significantly smaller than the regular ipod and then some.

But the measurements I've posted indicate otherwise.

[+JuggerNaut+]

i can't see my music library getting to that size anytime within worry. extrapolation places that point at about 2008ish

i forget alot of you are ok with 128kbps

I'm not, which is why my collection is 130 gigs :icon26:

hello, one of two.

[Don Carlos]

i can't see my music library getting to that size anytime within worry. extrapolation places that point at about 2008ish

i forget alot of you are ok with 128kbps

I'm not, which is why my collection is 130 gigs :icon26:

Hardcore!!!!

[+JuggerNaut+]

i can't see my music library getting to that size anytime within worry. extrapolation places that point at about 2008ish

i forget alot of you are ok with 128kbps

I'm not, which is why my collection is 130 gigs :icon26:

i'm mostly flac. how about you?

[Dave]

Not that advanced.. I have quite a few 320 kbit AAC files

[plained]

compression is ok if its all you can afford jugg.


i use 44100 and 16665 or whatever, it sounds like snapshots of sound but its better than a rackety racket.

[Turbine]

Holly Shit, I just might actualy, finaly, get an iPod.

Any idea on the price?

[mad]

UK price
£139.00 2gig
£179.00 4gig

[losCHUNK]

thats pretty cool

[[xeno]Julios]

um- can anyone tell me why the nano is so cool? It's not that much smaller than the regular ipod.

[Mr.Magnetichead]

UK price
£139.00 2gig
£179.00 4gig

We get raped once again. Fuck that shit. I'm importing if I get one.

[shiznit]

Because it's another overhyped and obsolete product from apple and this time it's a few mm smaller.

[+JuggerNaut+]

compression is ok if its all you can afford jugg.


i use 44100 and 16665 or whatever, it sounds like snapshots of sound but its better than a rackety racket.

sorry, but FLAC is lossless.