Went Fucking Nuts!

Post by **Mr.Magnetichead** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:09 pm

No, that word would be anthropomorphic

Post by **Zerofactor** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:11 pm

Yes, that's true. But seriously, like I've said in my previous threads about drawing, if you can do better, show me. I'm on my way to taking classes soon, and I will make this my career.

Post by **Mr.Magnetichead** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:14 pm

You're on your way? Oh ok. I thought you might actually have some training. I myself am just about to start the second part of my 4 year course at art school.

Still that is really poor for someone who plans to get into art school. Can I see some more of your portfolio? I might be able to help you organise it.

Post by **Ryoki** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:17 pm

Zerofactor wrote:Yes, that's true. But seriously, like I've said in my previous threads about drawing, if you can do better, show me. I'm on my way to taking classes soon, and I will make this my career.

Your career huh? Dude, you lack talent - this pic you posted is something i'd expect on some hentai furry geocities site made by some twelve year old.

Post by **Zerofactor** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:20 pm

Mr.Magnetichead wrote:You're on your way? Oh ok. I thought you might actually have some training. I myself am just about to start the second part of my 4 year course at art school.

Still that is really poor for someone who plans to get into art school. Can I see some more of your portfolio? I might be able to help you organise it.

Everything I've ever drawn is at http://paxcorpus.deviantart.com. Along with a few other things. Not really a portfolio, and even if you don't think any of it is good, that's what I've been doing.

Post by **Mr.Magnetichead** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:20 pm

I agree with Ryoki and he IS some kind of hentai furry geocities using twleve year old.

Post by **Mr.Magnetichead** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:21 pm

Zerofactor wrote:
Mr.Magnetichead wrote:You're on your way? Oh ok. I thought you might actually have some training. I myself am just about to start the second part of my 4 year course at art school.

Still that is really poor for someone who plans to get into art school. Can I see some more of your portfolio? I might be able to help you organise it.
Everything I've ever drawn is at http://paxcorpus.deviantart.com. Along with a few other things. Not really a portfolio, and even if you don't think any of it is good, that's what I've been doing.

Wow...you're 20? Yeah that stuff is really bad. Can I suggest accounting?

Post by **Zerofactor** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:23 pm

I wouldn't suggest giving me a career that has anything to do with managing people's money.

Post by **Dek** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:23 pm

This was my entry into the "draw yourself as a simpson thread" at sijun..

I was also the texture artist for Threewave.. reworking my portfolio site atm..

Post by **Zerofactor** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:23 pm

You actually think this is bad? I think that's my best one, ever.

Post by **Zerofactor** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:25 pm

Dek wrote:This was my entry into the "draw yourself as a simpson thread" at sijun..

I was also the texture artist for Threewave.. reworking my portfolio site atm..

Yea, but that's Matt Groening's style.

Post by **Mr.Magnetichead** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:25 pm

Yes. It's awful, the background is nothing more than a smattering of a default photoshop brush and her face is SO fucked up it could have be drawn by Rob Rob Liefeld.

Post by **MKJ** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:25 pm

Zerofactor wrote:
Dek wrote:http://learntodraw.com/
Thanks, but I don't draw fruit.

how very shortsighted

Post by **MKJ** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:26 pm

Zerofactor wrote:You actually think this is bad? I think that's my best one, ever.

the pic you posted in this thread is much better than that link, sir.
i mean, wow

Post by **Zerofactor** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:26 pm

MKJ wrote:
Zerofactor wrote:
Dek wrote:http://learntodraw.com/
Thanks, but I don't draw fruit.
how very shortsighted

Maybe if the site loaded properly I would've seen past that stupid top banner.

Post by **Mr.Magnetichead** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:27 pm

Zerofactor wrote:
Yea, but that's Matt Groening's style.

No it's not. Matt isn't actually a very good drawer, he can't draw the simpsons for shit. If you actually look at his drawings of the characters they look like the early Tracey Ullman.

Post by **Zerofactor** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:28 pm

MKJ wrote:
Zerofactor wrote:You actually think this is bad? I think that's my best one, ever.
the pic you posted in this thread is much better than that link, sir.
i mean, wow

I don't understand... Do you guys visit art galleries weekly or something? I really don't see how that drawing is bad in any way. It's not supposed to look exactly like a photo realistic picture.

Post by **raw** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:29 pm

I wouldn't worry too much about Mr.Magnetichead's opinion. At one point he changed his name to RedQUEEN or something like that and when he posted his pic, we all questioned his sex and his sexual orientation.

Post by **Zerofactor** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:29 pm

Mr.Magnetichead wrote:
Zerofactor wrote:
Yea, but that's Matt Groening's style.
No it's not. Matt isn't actually a very good drawer, he can't draw the simpsons for shit. If you actually look at his drawings of the characters they look like the early Tracey Ullman.

Ok, but I still don't think it's Dek's personal drawing style. Hell, I could draw you a Simpson character.

Post by **Dek** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:30 pm

You have a huge problem with proportion, lighting, shading, details, hue, value, color, etc..

Post by **Dek** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:31 pm

Zerofactor wrote:
Mr.Magnetichead wrote:
Zerofactor wrote:
Yea, but that's Matt Groening's style.
No it's not. Matt isn't actually a very good drawer, he can't draw the simpsons for shit. If you actually look at his drawings of the characters they look like the early Tracey Ullman.
Ok, but I still don't think it's Dek's personal drawing style. Hell, I could draw you a Simpson character.

Correct, the assignment was to draw yourself as a simpson character..

Post by **Zerofactor** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:31 pm

Dek wrote:You have a huge problem with proportion, lighting, shading, details, hue, value, color, etc..

This is why I'm going to take classes.

Post by **Mr.Magnetichead** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:31 pm

raw wrote:I wouldn't worry too much about Mr.Magnetichead's opinion. At one point he changed his name to RedQUEEN or something like that and when he posted his pic, we all questioned his sex and his sexual orientation.

Yes because there have NEVER been any gay artists. Never ever EVER.

Post by **raw** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:32 pm

hom0

Post by **MKJ** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:32 pm

Zerofactor wrote:
MKJ wrote:
Zerofactor wrote:You actually think this is bad? I think that's my best one, ever.
the pic you posted in this thread is much better than that link, sir.
i mean, wow
I don't understand... Do you guys visit art galleries weekly or something? I really don't see how that drawing is bad in any way. It's not supposed to look exactly like a photo realistic picture.

you dont have to visit art galleries to see if someone is drawn nicely, sir. see, it lacks detail. and i dont mean that in a realistic way, i mean it lacks shadowing and highlights. it makes it all look very flat. also, the use of color is more than bland which makes it look unfinished. it also looks as if you never heard of an eraser and just kept the obvious mistakes as you went along.

the pic you posted here has some charme, simply because its all black & white. the technique may not be there but the hard contrast makes it ok to look at.
if you look longer than 15 seconds you'll notice the obvious failure in draing skills though.