I will probably upgrade to Vista when it ships, next year I'll prolly build a new machine from scratch. When XP rolled around in 2001, I didn't see much use for an upgrade, so I was still using 98 SE for a good year or so. But once I finally did the clean install, I noticed XP Pro was much much better than 98. XP SP2 is stable (I probably seen it crash a handful of times in the 3 years since).
With Vista I think it would be logical for most users that purchase new machines so they can take advantage of the cleaner code (Server 2003 SP1) and generally be able to uprade in minutes and not worry about old patches and hotfixes. And hopefully software compatibility will be strong out of the box since MS has released their tentitive sdk packages for many of the new technology enhancements, available under XP right now.
Vista features so far, and by the time the retail roll out, many of these will be refined and a ton more should be added.
http://weakmind.org/upload/files/LonghornFeatures.html
Vista video
-
+JuggerNaut+
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
what's the problem? for retards, it works just fine. if you're more technically inclined, you know what to get whether it's a hardware or software firewall.diego wrote:I'm so glad they still got that great windows-firewall in it!!!
I know they probably improved it, so I'm just bitching, don't mind me.
[img]http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c113/ChipV/peso3.jpg[/img]
-
+JuggerNaut+
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
Why? It would be the same thing as having all four PCs up and downloading at the same time.Geebs wrote:I'm sure the cable companies will figure out some way to block this.rep wrote:You can connect more than one IP to the same PC... It's strange, but logical. If you have fast internet such as cable, and multiple IP addresses, usually the cable company (since Docsis2.0 and 3.0 modems have an incredible throughput anyway) limits your bandwidth per IP... This is why if you have 4 IP addresses, each can possibly be downloading at the full 7MB/s speed because it's not 7MB/s divided by 4, it's 4 individual allowances of 7MB/s. I think my modem gets 40MB/s or a little higher. I'll have to check sometime.
As far as the Windows Firewall goes, it's great. The average consumer (Read: Your gifted friend who buys the most expensive video card even though you told them the one $120 cheaper performs better) Doesn't care about firewalls... If XP SP2 and Vista have it enabled to begin with, that half way protects them...
So in turn, viruses, trojans, and script kiddies that aren't all that great but would be able to easily slip into an unprotected system wouldn't get beyond that, albeit poor, protection.
Let people like us worry about hardware firewalls... We're the ones with the fastest connections and best computers so obviously we're the biggest threat anyway. What would do more damage, a DDoS attack from a bunch of broadband PCs, or a DDoS attack from a cluster of 56K jalopies in Wisconsin?
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
-
Keep It Real