When Geoff gets on here and posts a link to some incriminating evidence that "proves" or "reasons" that someone is guilty or up to something bad (almost always Bush-related), everyone's like, "Shut up. Quit posting stupid stuff" and all of that.
Then somebody comes on here and posts a video/documentary/series/whatever that you can watch and like fifty people flock into the thread and they're like "Fuck, that video is totally right, man!" It's the same kind of stuff. All is speculation. Nothing is ever laid out as plain fact. Some of the information is even flat-out useless in some cases (I'm thinking about that guy with the radio program and his documentary that was posted here a few months ago).
This says a couple of things to me, I think. One is, the wise keep their fucking mouth shut instead of getting on a forum and saying a bunch of bull dealing with the president and terrorism and the like, when they know fuck-all about it.
Secondly, you're too lazy to read. You'll only watch a documentary by scrupulous idiots who can make a buck because they know this incriminating fact and that, even though they never prove anything -- it's all speculation. Now, when you throw several speculative, negative documentaries together, you get really silly results. Who's right? Who's wrong? Doesn't matter as long as you have somebody to attack/insult/belittle so you can fulfill your desire to show everybody else on the internet that you know everything there is to know, when the truth is you're an ignorant college-age prick overflowing with arrogance. You've not lived and you know nothing. Hope that's not too general.
Furthermore, documentary 1 "proves so convincingly" (for instance) that Bush is behind the attacks. Documentary 2 says just that the government was ignorant of them. Documentary three "proves" this or that. Sorry, I'm scatterbrained again. My point is, a good deal of you people are hungry and eager to believe anything bad about Bush just because it's Bush and it's bad.
You're dying to complain.
That said, if you didn't read my other thread of scatterbrained rants -- I'm not affiliated with any party at the moment. These are just some thoughts I've been having recently.
Part 2 (mini)
-
Uaintseenme
- Posts: 971
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 12:28 am
-
Nightshade
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Re: Part 2 (mini)
Nice generalization there, bucko.Mogul wrote:I don't really read much of anything that's posted here
Re: Part 2 (mini)
not too general, but general enough. geoff gets slated because a) he posts nothing but links, b) he does nothing all day except look for links to post here, and c) he has fuck-all to say about the links he actually posts. oh, and d) he latches on to every stupid conspiracy theory he can find for no good reason. i think you'll find most people who talk about these things on here are actually capable of mature, rational thought, and certainly aren't college-age. i mean, drum is so fucking ancient he can remember riding his penny farthing to queen victoria's funeralMogul wrote:You'll only watch a documentary by scrupulous idiots who can make a buck because they know this incriminating fact and that, even though they never prove anything -- it's all speculation. Now, when you throw several speculative, negative documentaries together, you get really silly results. Who's right? Who's wrong? Doesn't matter as long as you have somebody to attack/insult/belittle so you can fulfill your desire to show everybody else on the internet that you know everything there is to know, when the truth is you're an ignorant college-age prick overflowing with arrogance. You've not lived and you know nothing. Hope that's not too general.