lcd ecommendations?

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
mad
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 6:37 pm

lcd ecommendations?

Post by mad »

I'm looking to buy a 17"/19" lcd
anyone got some recommendations?
wanna spend about £200 on it, looking at LG ones atm
Last edited by mad on Sun Jul 17, 2005 11:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
PhoeniX
Posts: 4067
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2000 7:00 am

Post by PhoeniX »

I've bought two Acer ones for people and their very nice monitors. Generally most tfts use only a few different tube things (or whatever their called- like loads of graphics cards use the same nVidia chips kind of thing)
mad
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 6:37 pm

Post by mad »

weee
Last edited by mad on Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

I'd recommend getting one, they're aces.
mad
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 6:37 pm

Post by mad »

heh, someone said vewsonic ones are good
sancti0n
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:59 pm

Post by sancti0n »

LG
Denz
Posts: 2587
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Denz »

I like Sony myself but they are too pricey
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

mad wrote:heh, someone said vewsonic ones are good
they are, as are Dell's
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

Denz wrote:I like Sony myself but they are too pricey
shocking
User avatar
duffman91
Posts: 1278
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by duffman91 »

If you can afford it, I suggest getting an Apple LCD monitor. They are absolutelly the best LCD's I've ever used.

I personally have a 20" widescreen one. Absolutelly fabulous.
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

duffman91 wrote:If you can afford it, I suggest getting an Apple LCD monitor. They are absolutelly the best LCD's I've ever used.

I personally have a 20" widescreen one. Absolutelly fabulous.
:icon14: From what I've seen in stores they are amazing. I have no reason to move to LCD but if I ever had the cash I would so buy that 30" model.
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

Samsung
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

My 23" Cinema Display doesn't have a single duff pixel. Own£d
saturn
Posts: 4334
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by saturn »

23" Cinema Display is nice and all, if that's all you can afford.
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

I saved some cash so I could paint it puke green, just like my house >:-E
Last edited by Geebs on Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

*waits for the obligatory OLED post*
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
saturn
Posts: 4334
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by saturn »

Organic Light Emitting Devices are the future!!! You can even print them!!!!!
rep
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by rep »

saturn wrote:23" Cinema Display is nice and all, if that's all you can afford.
What is the response time on that trash, 30ms? They say 16, but it performs as 30. :lol: Plus you need a special video card.

There is a Samsung display that destroys it. 24 inches, 25ms response time, same price range, and works with everything.

Image
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
rep
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by rep »

saturn wrote:Organic Light Emitting Devices are the future!!! You can even print them!!!!!
Isn't OLED the coolest? Literally, since it has the least power consumption of all full color displays... Primarily due to the fact that it doesn't use a backlight. I can't wait.

30 inch displays for $1000? See you there.
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
saturn
Posts: 4334
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by saturn »

sarcasm is wasted on rep
User avatar
*OptimusPrime*
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2001 8:00 am

Post by *OptimusPrime* »

rep wrote:
saturn wrote:23" Cinema Display is nice and all, if that's all you can afford.
What is the response time on that trash, 30ms? They say 16, but it performs as 30. :lol: Plus you need a special video card.

There is a Samsung display that destroys it. 24 inches, 25ms response time, same price range, and works with everything.
but does it look sexy? no
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

rep wrote:
saturn wrote:23" Cinema Display is nice and all, if that's all you can afford.
What is the response time on that trash, 30ms? They say 16, but it performs as 30. :lol: Plus you need a special video card.

[url=http://product.samsung.com/cgi-bin/nabc/product/b2c_product_detail.jsp?eUser=&prod_id=NB24BSAS]There is a Samsung display that destroys it. 24 inches, 25ms response time, same price range, and works with everything.
1) Never believe manufacturers' response time claims. I have yet to see any ghosting.
2) My monitor has 230400 pixels, and all of them work.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

poor, poor black levels.
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

We have 5 Samsungs at work and I have one at home, and there's not a single dead pixel on any of them.
rep
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by rep »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:poor, poor black levels.
Exactly.

Why buy an LCD screen when in thirty months you can buy an OLED screen that will perform better and be cheaper as well?
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
Post Reply