Battlefield 2 expansion.. already *sighs*
Hey is this the same game that refuses to work unless you've got the very latest graphics cards? Not because slightly older cards won't work, but because EA flat out decided they would prevent the game from making use of them?
Quality game that. I've got a card that will be accepted by the game now, and I'm still not going to buy it.
Quality game that. I've got a card that will be accepted by the game now, and I'm still not going to buy it.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
― Terry A. Davis
-
reefsurfer
- Posts: 4065
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:00 am
-
reefsurfer
- Posts: 4065
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:00 am
-
reefsurfer
- Posts: 4065
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:00 am
-
reefsurfer
- Posts: 4065
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:00 am
I'd like to think I've got some form of ideals as far as games publishers go, and can protest (albeit in a miniscule way) by not purchasing games like that.
However I lost a lot of that consistency when I bought HL2.
Also as for me being the only one losing, I don't see that that's true. If I don't play, that's one less person on the servers. A primarily multiplayer game depends almost completely on the number of people on the servers.
However I lost a lot of that consistency when I bought HL2.
Also as for me being the only one losing, I don't see that that's true. If I don't play, that's one less person on the servers. A primarily multiplayer game depends almost completely on the number of people on the servers.
Last edited by Foo on Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
― Terry A. Davis
-
reefsurfer
- Posts: 4065
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:00 am
We all make our own choice's, and we all think different...Foo wrote:I'd like to think I've got some form of ideals as far as games publishers go, and can protest (albeit in a miniscule way) by not purchasing games like that.
However I lost a lot of that consistency when I bought HL2.
Also as for me being the only one losing, I don't see that that's true. If I don't play, that's one less person on the servers. A primarily multiplayer game depends almost completely on the number of people on the servers.
I like it, you dont.
It's a win win situation then.. :icon31:
-
reefsurfer
- Posts: 4065
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:00 am
i dunno, if they would'nt have fucked up the patch wich they did get out pretty fast, everything would have been ok.
this game has such awesome potential, it's obvious why you need a decent system+lots of ram. 64 players going at it with dozens of weapons, vehicles, airplanes, etc.. you cant expect to run it on a gameboy advance.
i'll be willing to bet quakewars:et will demand the same from a system. massive FAST paced games will need it.
this game has such awesome potential, it's obvious why you need a decent system+lots of ram. 64 players going at it with dozens of weapons, vehicles, airplanes, etc.. you cant expect to run it on a gameboy advance.
i'll be willing to bet quakewars:et will demand the same from a system. massive FAST paced games will need it.
-
Nightshade
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Yes, well you'd have to be a complete dipshit to think that I meant that is was actually lag. What I mean is that it gives me the same stuttering, jerky shit I get when I connect to any of the horribly crappy ranked servers. Mong.reefsurfer wrote::lol:Nightshade wrote: lag in SP MODE.
That is fucked up.
How is that possible since it has nothing to do with being connected to internet server/client side. :icon32:
you dont have to prove anything. it ruins your credibility as someone who informs casual gamers about cool games, though.reefsurfer wrote:Who cares?MKJ wrote:reef is starting to look more like a generic fanboy than a 'hardcore gamer' :thumbdown:
I got nothing to prove.. nor do i care what a name on a forum think.
so so much for the kabillion gamethreads about "the best game evar!11one" (*just another fps)
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
-
reefsurfer
- Posts: 4065
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:00 am
When did i make a "the best game ever thread!!1111"?MKJ wrote:
you dont have to prove anything. it ruins your credibility though.
so so much for the kabillion gamethreads about "the best game evar!11one" (*just another fps)
Stfu...i never asked you to read my game threads or listen to what i say.
If i post news about games or post that i really like that game or this feature..does that fuck your world up?
It seems as if i have let you down? Was i your game god? did you used to look up to me?.. and now i have let you down.. "stupid reefsurfer..i hate him now*boohoo*"
Because that what it looks like in your posts ffs...
I dident ask for a fucking credibility you fuck face, i posted MY thoughts about games..
chillpill. take one :icon14:
on that note btw, when someone else posted a gamethread you were all over it, saying how yours were so much better because you suplied screens n background n shit. like you felt someone was moving in on your territory. sems like it bothers you more than me
i still wub you though. i wasnt the one calling you a "fucking idiot". yet you feel the need to open up your can-o-insults
on that note btw, when someone else posted a gamethread you were all over it, saying how yours were so much better because you suplied screens n background n shit. like you felt someone was moving in on your territory. sems like it bothers you more than me
i still wub you though. i wasnt the one calling you a "fucking idiot". yet you feel the need to open up your can-o-insults
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
-
reefsurfer
- Posts: 4065
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:00 am




