http://durhamtownship.com/portfolio/
discussion here:
http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/43495
some beautiful photos here
I used to collect their shells from tree trunks and put them in huge containers. I still have one my mother kept. I don't know why, but it's still around. It's kind of creepy to have a bunch of insect husks on a shelf, LOL...
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
-
Giraffe }{unter
- Posts: 2941
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 8:00 am
Re: some beautiful photos here
[quote="[xeno]
http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/43495[/quote]
I love all the idiots arguing about the photgraphs...
http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/43495[/quote]
I love all the idiots arguing about the photgraphs...
[url=http://www.dumpt.com][img]http://www.giraffe-hunter.com/images/dumpt.gif[/img][/url]
[size=85]DUMPT.com fully revamped, simple image hosting/dumping ground
No registration required![/size]
[size=85]DUMPT.com fully revamped, simple image hosting/dumping ground
No registration required![/size]
Re: some beautiful photos here
:lol:I think that Walter Benjamin would disagree with Citizen Premier.
As for accuracy it sounds like what your looking for is reality (I assume this partly because of your difficulty in seeing photography as art). However Jean Baudrillard points out that "reduplicating" of the real through simulation produces the "hyperreal." And since (as far as he is concerned at least) we are in a complete state of "hyperrealism" already there would be no point in seeking reality through photography, which for it part helps to create the "hyperreal". Reality "reduplicated" (photography) is "volatilized", and nether the reproduction nor the reproduced are of greater importance. Baudrillard claims this becomes an allegory for death, which makes the whole thing sound pretty arty to me.