Media Players for windows (mostly MP3)

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
Giraffe }{unter
Posts: 2941
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 8:00 am

Media Players for windows (mostly MP3)

Post by Giraffe }{unter »

I've been Using Windows media player 9 and now 10 since winamp 3.0 came out I didn't like how sluggish Winam 3 was so I went back to M$

It's hanging for about 5 - 10 seconds on all my PCs when I start playing an MP3 which is annoying because I can't adjust the volume, or shrink it down. I killed all the visualizations, but it still hangs.

Any suggestions for a good media player that will shrink down to the taskbar or have a really sleek player that can fit in the windows title bar so it can be always on top of all the windows?
[url=http://www.dumpt.com][img]http://www.giraffe-hunter.com/images/dumpt.gif[/img][/url]
[size=85]DUMPT.com fully revamped, simple image hosting/dumping ground
No registration required![/size]
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

so..you're saying you've tried Winamp 5.xx? that thing's hardly sluggish for me.
shiznit
Posts: 1244
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 4:39 pm

Post by shiznit »

Winamp 5 is like winamp2 now but much better, or try that other one. Damn wtf is the name, oh yeah foobar.
User avatar
duffman91
Posts: 1278
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by duffman91 »

Foobar is the only mp3 player I can stand to use. It is small and compact, it also has great plugin support.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

duffman91 wrote:Foobar is the only mp3 player I can stand to use. It is small and compact, it also has great plugin support.
i use this also, but haven't found an "alarm clock" plugin for it yet, or i'd use it exclusively.
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Transient »

Foobar or Winamp 2.81
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Denz
Posts: 2587
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Denz »

Winamp 5

and if it's sluggish perhaps you should get a real computer.
Deathshroud
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm

Post by Deathshroud »

I just downloaded that Foobar to check it out, and that thing is stripped down real nice. None of that flashy shit going on. Anyone know if there is a MAD input plug in for this?
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

Denz wrote:Winamp 5

and if it's sluggish perhaps you should get a real computer.
that's quite the :dork: statement.

i have a 900mhz PC with 512mb of ram with Winamp 5 and it runs great. i'm sure it's probably the slowest one here.
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

duffman91 wrote:Foobar is the only mp3 player I can stand to use. It is small and compact, it also has great plugin support.
You should be happy to know that because of some post you made 2 years ago I discovered the wonders that are fb2k. Thank you good sir as fb2k has treated be very kindly up to this day.
rep
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by rep »

[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
Giraffe }{unter
Posts: 2941
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Giraffe }{unter »

Denz wrote:Winamp 5

and if it's sluggish perhaps you should get a real computer.
:icon19:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:so..you're saying you've tried Winamp 5.xx? that thing's hardly sluggish for me.
No After that piece of poopie Winamp 3 AFAIK I don't think I ever went back.


I forgot about XMPayer, it's an application I use on my USB Drive, allong with portable Firefox. It allows me to play m MP3 files from any computer without having to install a player. I plug in the drive and just run the EXE. It's got a ton of features I'll prolly not be using but it's does exactly what I want. It's slim and only uses 2,632 K of resources. :icon14: It's got great audio reproduction I think I'll stick with this...

[lvlshot]http://pages.prodigy.net/dpfalandys/llama/screenshot/DTxmplayer.jpg[/lvlshot]
[url=http://www.dumpt.com][img]http://www.giraffe-hunter.com/images/dumpt.gif[/img][/url]
[size=85]DUMPT.com fully revamped, simple image hosting/dumping ground
No registration required![/size]
Giraffe }{unter
Posts: 2941
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Giraffe }{unter »

That's great if that's all you can afford :icon14:
[url=http://www.dumpt.com][img]http://www.giraffe-hunter.com/images/dumpt.gif[/img][/url]
[size=85]DUMPT.com fully revamped, simple image hosting/dumping ground
No registration required![/size]
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

Giraffe }{unter wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:so..you're saying you've tried Winamp 5.xx? that thing's hardly sluggish for me.
No After that piece of poopie Winamp 3 AFAIK I don't think I ever went back.

yeah, 3 was so bad, that it bordered on ridiculous. 5 has the skinability of 3, with the stability of 2xx
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Post by plained »

quicktime pro man yea
it is about time!
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dzjepp »

Media Player Classic/Zoom Player Pro (shareware)/VLC (VideoLAN Client)/BSplayer Pro (shareware)

Not in any particular order, but from using these I've found them to perform quite nicely. Also, they are usually rated quite high on software download sites (like betanews.com).
Post Reply