Footage you have to see - Bunker Buster in action. Damn!

Post by **Cool Blue** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:30 pm

http://www.big-boys.com/articles/bunkerbuster.html

Effective. :icon14:

Post by **R00k** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:53 pm

Looks very effective. :icon14:

That's not the nuclear version though is it?

Post by **Ray Finkle** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:57 pm

R00k wrote:Looks very effective. :icon14:

That's not the nuclear version though is it?

Probably not.

Post by **Canidae** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:59 pm

They don't make nukes that small.

Post by **shadd_** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:01 pm

hmm. wonder what the steel reinforcement specs were on that slab?

Post by **Don Carlos** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:03 pm

shadd_ wrote:hmm. wonder what the steel reinforcement specs were on that slab?

Slim to none?

Post by **Dave** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:06 pm

R00k wrote:Looks very effective. :icon14:

That's not the nuclear version though is it?

You think foreign relations were strained over Iraq war... The fallout from blowing up a nuclear device would probably eclipse even that

Post by **Dave** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:09 pm

.. Ok.. just watched it.

1. it looks computer generated.... eh .. maybe it's not
2. a nuclear device would have annihilated the bridge

Post by **saibot** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:14 pm

OMG A VIDEO FROM BIG-BOYS LETS POST IN ON Q3W!!!!

Post by **R00k** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:19 pm

Dave wrote:.. Ok.. just watched it.

1. it looks computer generated.
2. a nuclear device would have annihilated the bridge

I know, I just remember reading that Rumsfeld supported further development on a bunker buster missile that can carry a tiny nuclear warhead.

I never thought 'small' and 'nuclear' could go in the same sentence, and I'm still not really sure what this so-called small nuclear explosion would look like though.

Post by **shadd_** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:19 pm

saibot wrote:OMG A VIDEO FROM BIG-BOYS LETS POST IN ON Q3W!!!!

fuck man get a grip. someone already thought of that.

Post by **Tormentius** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:19 pm

saibot wrote:OMG A VIDEO FROM BIG-BOYS LETS POST IN ON Q3W!!!!

It was interesting and some of us hadn't seen it. In other words, bugger off.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:31 pm

NEWS FLASH MORONS...thats not a bunker...

Post by **Cool Blue** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:48 pm

Freakaloin wrote:NEWS FLASH MORONS...thats not a bunker...

NEWS FLASH MORON... nobody said it was.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:59 pm

well obviously its a bridge buster...but a bunker buster? unless i see its bs...

Post by **Cool Blue** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:04 pm

You couldn't see the inside of your own eyelids.

Post by **Transient** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:49 am

saibot wrote:OMG A VIDEO FROM BIG-BOYS LETS POST IN ON Q3W!!!!

STFU tobias.

Post by **plained** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:57 am

bustin shit up

Post by **Canidae** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 3:21 am

Freakaloin wrote:NEWS FLASH MORONS...thats not a bunker...

NEWSFLASH APRON WEARER: No one parks planes under bridges...it's a cut away mockup of a bunker to demonstrate and observe the said bomb in action.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 3:46 am

hmmm...almost every war since ww1, planes have been hidden under bridges...dumbo alert!!!...

Post by **YourGrandpa** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 4:24 am

That thing cut through the bridge like butter.

Post by **Ryoki** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:11 am

Am i the only one that's not impressed? Sure the thing cuts through a few meters of concrete, woohoo - but good luck finding a bunker with anything important in it that close to the surface.

Footage you have to see - Bunker Buster in action. Damn!

Footage you have to see - Bunker Buster in action. Damn!

!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: !!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: !!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: !!!!!!!!!!!!