not to crap on the classics but what's the deal with all this million year old technology they use against us. I mean imagine the shit the alien civilization could do now. Fuck the absolete burried technology... and what's with their lack of research? If they had access to our underground so intimately, why couldn't they figure out that this planet would not be hospitable for their kind?
for being so advanced they sure as hell made some dumb mistakes
War of the Worlds (spoilers inside)
It was envy. They envied our rich planet.Grandpa Stu wrote:there was a plot hole though. at the beginning it said the aliens planned this attack out of spite towards humans or something, right? but then later it's concluded that they had planned the attack millions of years before humans existed. so uh, what gives? did i not understand something at the beginning and it was actually earth as a whole they didn't like?
I fuckin loved it, liked the way the tension was maintained during the entire movie, even though the end was rather cheesy
[i]And shepherds we shall be, for thee my Lord for thee, Power hath descended forth from thy hand, that our feet may swiftly carry out thy command, we shall flow a river forth to thee, and teeming with souls shall it ever be. In nomine patris, et fili, et spiritus sancti.[/i]
-
Giraffe }{unter
- Posts: 2941
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 8:00 am
Just got back from watching it. What a waste of cash will smith is far better than tom cruise on July 4th flicks
[url=http://www.dumpt.com][img]http://www.giraffe-hunter.com/images/dumpt.gif[/img][/url]
[size=85]DUMPT.com fully revamped, simple image hosting/dumping ground
No registration required![/size]
[size=85]DUMPT.com fully revamped, simple image hosting/dumping ground
No registration required![/size]
wow. this guy REALLY missed the point :icon14:o'dium wrote:WAAAAAA THE EVIL RAG HEADS SAID A BAD WORK!!! IT BRINGS BACK MEMORIES OF 911!!! WAAA!!Transient wrote:Looks like you're the one crying, o'dium. STFU.
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
i just got back from watching it. amazingly immersive :icon14:
spielberg really did an impressive job at bringing a genocide to film.
i liked how he used the dust during the first attack as a reminescence to 9/11 and schindler's list.
and the train scene that was obviously aimed at the trains that transported the jews to the KZ.
about the terrorist thing: i think there are several reasons why they put it in there. at first this shows how kid's are in fear of this invisible enemy. and then, this tells the audience that the film is a reflection on the current situation, a state of fear and percieved vulnerability.
i think, the film should have been crueler at times. i was missing a really severe, shocking scene. the dunging could have been played out better.
the one thing, that really made the film worse, was the ending.
these aliens actually have a bioengineered terraforming plant, that is fueled by human blood but then they die because of the bacteria inside the digested humans? lol...
well... the ending is obviously the weak point of the film. it was ok for wells to use it back then as it had references to the british empire's war strategies. but how could they reuse it for the spielberg version, even though signs and evolution allready persiflaged it?
maybe there's a bit more to the ending words of the narrator. but i've yet to think about them.
oh... and the son should have died. the whole meaning of the scene where he joins the army troops is utterly destroyed by his return.
spielberg really did an impressive job at bringing a genocide to film.
i liked how he used the dust during the first attack as a reminescence to 9/11 and schindler's list.
and the train scene that was obviously aimed at the trains that transported the jews to the KZ.
about the terrorist thing: i think there are several reasons why they put it in there. at first this shows how kid's are in fear of this invisible enemy. and then, this tells the audience that the film is a reflection on the current situation, a state of fear and percieved vulnerability.
i think, the film should have been crueler at times. i was missing a really severe, shocking scene. the dunging could have been played out better.
the one thing, that really made the film worse, was the ending.
these aliens actually have a bioengineered terraforming plant, that is fueled by human blood but then they die because of the bacteria inside the digested humans? lol...
well... the ending is obviously the weak point of the film. it was ok for wells to use it back then as it had references to the british empire's war strategies. but how could they reuse it for the spielberg version, even though signs and evolution allready persiflaged it?
maybe there's a bit more to the ending words of the narrator. but i've yet to think about them.
oh... and the son should have died. the whole meaning of the scene where he joins the army troops is utterly destroyed by his return.
Maybe to figure out what made us able to live here when they can't. But they didn't succeed in figuring it out before it was too late, so they died. Not sure really, just a guess. I also thought it was rather strange, and that's the only thing that I came up with that could make sense.
[color=#DFB257][b]کΛFŦ | netrex[/b][/color] of [url=http://www.saft-clan.net/]S.A.F.T. - The Pride of [color=#FF0000]No[/color]rw[color=#0000FF]ay[/color][/url]
then, a million HG Wells fans would go "waa waa its not like the book worst movie ever!!!"riddla wrote:didn't forget at all, Spielberg had plenty of decades to improve upon the plot mechanisms and avoid the deus ex machina.saturn wrote:maybe you forgot that it's based on a HG Wells story written and set end of 19th century in Victorian England and an analogue to European colonial actions in their colonies?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
well...
i think the storytwist is, in fact, that the whole bacteria thing is totally bollocks. it's a giantic deus ex machina... totally unbelievable. and it is in fact the only deus ex machina in the movie.
if the writers would have ended the story in a realistic way, humanity would have been extinguished, no matter what they would have done.
so the film, by it's abrubt and fabricated ending, leaves us with the impression that we are very vulnerable, even though the threat is resolved.
this is as well supported by the unrealistic way the characters reappear in the end. boston is totally destroyed but then, in this tiny appartment, electricity is working and everyone is alive, lol...
i think the ending is intentionally abrubt and unbelievable. either to keep the displeasing feeling or... maybe ray actually died.
on this behalf, the setting in the post 9/11 US is totally vital. a whole society that is complety at guard of an terrorist attack get's invaded and destroyed so quick. if the aliens were again paired against the self confident victorian england, this would have no relevance to our situation.
i think the storytwist is, in fact, that the whole bacteria thing is totally bollocks. it's a giantic deus ex machina... totally unbelievable. and it is in fact the only deus ex machina in the movie.
if the writers would have ended the story in a realistic way, humanity would have been extinguished, no matter what they would have done.
so the film, by it's abrubt and fabricated ending, leaves us with the impression that we are very vulnerable, even though the threat is resolved.
this is as well supported by the unrealistic way the characters reappear in the end. boston is totally destroyed but then, in this tiny appartment, electricity is working and everyone is alive, lol...
i think the ending is intentionally abrubt and unbelievable. either to keep the displeasing feeling or... maybe ray actually died.
on this behalf, the setting in the post 9/11 US is totally vital. a whole society that is complety at guard of an terrorist attack get's invaded and destroyed so quick. if the aliens were again paired against the self confident victorian england, this would have no relevance to our situation.
Maybe not if it wasn't carrying a current (or however it's said).zeeko wrote:ok question 4, how the hell did they get that minivan to work..
super tom-"ah just replace the solenoid that will fix it"
auto repairman "OH YEAH (to his buddy), SEE I TOLD YOU SO!"
wouldn't all of the solenoids go kaput after the EMP thing?
[color=#DFB257][b]کΛFŦ | netrex[/b][/color] of [url=http://www.saft-clan.net/]S.A.F.T. - The Pride of [color=#FF0000]No[/color]rw[color=#0000FF]ay[/color][/url]
Saw it today. Decent but not great. Purely as a technical achievement, it's among Spielberg's best...and despite the fact that Tom Cruise is as bright as a can of mandarin orange slices, he creates a very sympathetic character here. So....great SFX, good characters, workable script...why don't I lurv it? The story itself is just not very interesting, scary, or plausible (though I'm sure it certainly was back in 1898). Some stories ARE timeless...this just isn't one of them IMO.