Battlefield 2

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by o'dium »

Those very bottom shots can't be max settings, because further up the page, is this one:

http://www.bf2.be/page/screenpage1/22.j ... 0cb2985ab1

Now compare the polycount on the weapon to this one:

http://www.bf2.be/page/screenpage1/70.j ... 0cb2985ab1

(Things to look out for; Front sights, bullet chain, top handle)

So maybe this wont be as bad as most think ;)
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by o'dium »

In fact fuck it ill just get it and post my own shots lol...
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by o'dium »

Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

o'dium wrote:THAT SAID, there is no reason for it to be THIS low detail:

http://www.bf2.be/page/screenpage1/70.j ... 0cb2985ab1

HL2 with medium settings :( They could at least make the font higher res :p
You've got maps 10 times the size and vehicles on top of that. Please do not compare it to HL2 DM.
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by o'dium »

Grudge wrote:
o'dium wrote:THAT SAID, there is no reason for it to be THIS low detail:

http://www.bf2.be/page/screenpage1/70.j ... 0cb2985ab1

HL2 with medium settings :( They could at least make the font higher res :p
You've got maps 10 times the size and vehicles on top of that. Please do not compare it to HL2 DM.
I already said that ;)

But i'll see for myself, i got a fast mirror...
Don Carlos
Posts: 17514
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by Don Carlos »

o'dium wrote:
Foo wrote:
Grudge wrote:lol @ Pauly

hey foo, fuck off and just try playing the game instead of basing an opinion on the screenshots
Eh? I think it was the post Pauly edited that explained I can't play it, it won't support my card (geforce 4 128Mb). Which only makes me thing worse of it. Far Cry is fine, HL2 is fine, D3 was fine. This doesn't look a patch on those and won't run on the same spec graphics card?

I can't base my opinion on much more, since the game's support is so shit it won't run on my perfectly able rig.
Thats not a GF4 MX is it? If so, good luck running anything out there "FINE". Honestly, devs don't support it because it doesn't support the latest features, its just a GF2 with a few more things. Wow.

I know, because i had one at one stage, and i had trouble running anything on it.
I only just got rid of mine and it ran things ok :p
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

o'dium wrote:Thats not a GF4 MX is it?
No.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
Don Carlos
Posts: 17514
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by Don Carlos »

Foo, we should play later and i shall fly a plane into you. Make it tomorrow? :D
Where were you when the West was defeated?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/doncarlos83][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gbar/doncarlos83.gif[/img][/url]
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by o'dium »

Don Carlos wrote:
o'dium wrote:
Foo wrote: Eh? I think it was the post Pauly edited that explained I can't play it, it won't support my card (geforce 4 128Mb). Which only makes me thing worse of it. Far Cry is fine, HL2 is fine, D3 was fine. This doesn't look a patch on those and won't run on the same spec graphics card?

I can't base my opinion on much more, since the game's support is so shit it won't run on my perfectly able rig.
Thats not a GF4 MX is it? If so, good luck running anything out there "FINE". Honestly, devs don't support it because it doesn't support the latest features, its just a GF2 with a few more things. Wow.

I know, because i had one at one stage, and i had trouble running anything on it.
I only just got rid of mine and it ran things ok :p
Ugle :puke:

I used to have one, and pretty much every game i picked up in the shop would say "This works on everything yo! Everything except the GF4 MX, because it sucks!"

I went from that to a FX 5600 Ultra, ran things great, then to a 6800 GT, and that obviously runs things nice.

The problem wasn't the MX's speed, it was the feature list, or lack there of. It just didn't support anything, it didn't even support FP/VP so games that use this heavily (FarCry, Doom 3, HL2 to name a few) will look bad, or worse.

Now, what people forget it that when they say "Mine ran things fine!" its not REALLY the right thing to say. I'm sure if i disabled all the good stuff to get the same settings as a GF4 MX, my games would run at stupid FPS. But thats just it, while your running around looking at a lifeless game with hard stencil shadows, none reflective water, and no fragment programs to think of, i'm running it all with BETTER FPS.

So yeah, its nice to say ya' got good FPS, but remember exactly how little your actually drawing compared to everybody else :p
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

For the nth time, I can't run it sir.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
Don Carlos
Posts: 17514
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by Don Carlos »

Oh right i was still on about a normal GF4...i had a GF4 ti4600 :D
Where were you when the West was defeated?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/doncarlos83][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gbar/doncarlos83.gif[/img][/url]
Don Carlos
Posts: 17514
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by Don Carlos »

Foo wrote:For the nth time, I can't run it sir.
YES YOU CAN!!!1112
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by o'dium »

Right, this mirror has dropped to shitty 250kb/sec, bah... I'll keep it going, got stuff to do anyways. Gotta go up town in a bit, pick the missus up.

I'll prolly have a game with j00 m0f0's l4t0rz.
rep
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by rep »

saturn wrote:
rep wrote:
saturn wrote:i got it in 5.5 minutes, eat that.
Yeah but you did it from a server that wasn't loaded at the time. NEXT!
Untrue. You're my Property.
You're in a Matrix within a Matrix within a Matrix. The real world you're in, you have complete control over your body. The real world one level above you is people like FlamingTP pulling the strings. The real world above them (and the actual real world) is controlled by me.

Capiche?
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

Don Carlos wrote:
Foo wrote:For the nth time, I can't run it sir.
YES YOU CAN!!!1112
Can't. Downloaded, installed, updated to the drivers that came with it, and it loads to a black screen then backs out.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
rep
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by rep »

o'dium wrote:Right, this mirror has dropped to shitty 250kb/sec, bah... I'll keep it going, got stuff to do anyways. Gotta go up town in a bit, pick the missus up.

I'll prolly have a game with j00 m0f0's l4t0rz.
You should have installed True Downloader. I got mine the fastest out of everyone.
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by o'dium »

rep wrote:
o'dium wrote:Right, this mirror has dropped to shitty 250kb/sec, bah... I'll keep it going, got stuff to do anyways. Gotta go up town in a bit, pick the missus up.

I'll prolly have a game with j00 m0f0's l4t0rz.
You should have installed True Downloader. I got mine the fastest out of everyone.
Like I said, i'm busy :p So it doesn't matter, i wont get chance to play it for half an hou and it will be done before then. No biggie :p
DiscoDave
Posts: 1645
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:33 pm

Post by DiscoDave »

I love it, I think its a brilliant game, I was never a fan of the first one but i really like bf2 for some reason, dont know why... With that said, I shall be getting it first day of release :). Demo is cool apart from odd glitches and the maximum time thing.
rep
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by rep »

Choppers are pretty lame, aren't they? I hope someone makes an arcade mod soon and removes some of the stupid realism.

If I wanted realism, I'd join up and get all the killing fun I can handle.

Has anyone figured out the sniper rifles yet, though? Close range they're incredibly easy, and what I mean is it's easier for me to kill someone than it is for you to kill someone, but when someone is more than say 700M away (standing still) even if I raise the aim a foot it doesn't hit them.

I've made some 1200M snipes in Joint Operations, partly because I have access to binoculars and I can set the gun right. Anyone know what the deal is?

I nailed a chopper head on with a tank, and the chopper didn't explode. There's your realism, fanboys. :\

I was honestly surprised at how smoothly it runs, though. Everything turned on, totally smooth at 1280x1024.
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dzjepp »

n00b. BF has always required you to lead your shots, not much, just a tad bit. I was sniping last nite from that crane on the coalition side all the way to the american spawns. lol I fucking own.

EDIT: From a good distance anyway. Closeup you can pretty much hit normally.
SOAPboy
Posts: 8268
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 7:00 am

Post by SOAPboy »

rep wrote:Choppers are pretty lame, aren't they? I hope someone makes an arcade mod soon and removes some of the stupid realism.

If I wanted realism, I'd join up and get all the killing fun I can handle.

Has anyone figured out the sniper rifles yet, though? Close range they're incredibly easy, and what I mean is it's easier for me to kill someone than it is for you to kill someone, but when someone is more than say 700M away (standing still) even if I raise the aim a foot it doesn't hit them.

I've made some 1200M snipes in Joint Operations, partly because I have access to binoculars and I can set the gun right. Anyone know what the deal is?

I nailed a chopper head on with a tank, and the chopper didn't explode. There's your realism, fanboys. :\

I was honestly surprised at how smoothly it runs, though. Everything turned on, totally smooth at 1280x1024.
You mean 1280x960.

Demo dont support 1280x1024..
[size=75][i]I once had a glass of milk.

It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.

I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
rep
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by rep »

dzjepp wrote:n00b. BF has always required you to lead your shots, not much, just a tad bit. I was sniping last nite from that crane on the coalition side all the way to the american spawns. lol I fucking own.

EDIT: From a good distance anyway. Closeup you can pretty much hit normally.
That's only like 400-500M, plus it's at a higher elevation. Those are simple, NEWB.

edit: My right monitor is what I was playing the game on. Thought it was 1280x1024, but that's what the monitor is set at, not the game. Oops.
Last edited by rep on Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
Don Carlos
Posts: 17514
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by Don Carlos »

SOAPboy wrote:
rep wrote:Choppers are pretty lame, aren't they? I hope someone makes an arcade mod soon and removes some of the stupid realism.

If I wanted realism, I'd join up and get all the killing fun I can handle.

Has anyone figured out the sniper rifles yet, though? Close range they're incredibly easy, and what I mean is it's easier for me to kill someone than it is for you to kill someone, but when someone is more than say 700M away (standing still) even if I raise the aim a foot it doesn't hit them.

I've made some 1200M snipes in Joint Operations, partly because I have access to binoculars and I can set the gun right. Anyone know what the deal is?

I nailed a chopper head on with a tank, and the chopper didn't explode. There's your realism, fanboys. :\

I was honestly surprised at how smoothly it runs, though. Everything turned on, totally smooth at 1280x1024.
You mean 1280x960.

Demo dont support 1280x1024..
BWAHAHAHAHAH
Denz
Posts: 2587
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Denz »

I suppose if you're and ATI fan then you're pretty much out of luck until they come up with some better drivers.
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dzjepp »

How so? Runs fine on ATI here.
Post Reply