Don Carlos wrote:o'dium wrote:Foo wrote:
Eh? I think it was the post Pauly edited that explained I can't play it, it won't support my card (geforce 4 128Mb). Which only makes me thing worse of it. Far Cry is fine, HL2 is fine, D3 was fine. This doesn't look a patch on those and won't run on the same spec graphics card?
I can't base my opinion on much more, since the game's support is so shit it won't run on my perfectly able rig.
Thats not a GF4 MX is it? If so, good luck running anything out there "FINE". Honestly, devs don't support it because it doesn't support the latest features, its just a GF2 with a few more things. Wow.
I know, because i had one at one stage, and i had trouble running anything on it.
I only just got rid of mine and it ran things ok

Ugle
I used to have one, and pretty much every game i picked up in the shop would say "This works on everything yo! Everything except the GF4 MX, because it sucks!"
I went from that to a FX 5600 Ultra, ran things great, then to a 6800 GT, and that obviously runs things nice.
The problem wasn't the MX's speed, it was the feature list, or lack there of. It just didn't support anything, it didn't even support FP/VP so games that use this heavily (FarCry, Doom 3, HL2 to name a few) will look bad, or worse.
Now, what people forget it that when they say "Mine ran things fine!" its not REALLY the right thing to say. I'm sure if i disabled all the good stuff to get the same settings as a GF4 MX, my games would run at stupid FPS. But thats just it, while your running around looking at a lifeless game with hard stencil shadows, none reflective water, and no fragment programs to think of, i'm running it all with BETTER FPS.
So yeah, its nice to say ya' got good FPS, but remember exactly how little your actually drawing compared to everybody else
