lostfile401 wrote:All drugs, not just illegal drugs are regulated by the us government.
Would that include caffeine?
lostfile401 wrote: Drugs that make it through this process are then able to be prescribed by doctors. Who have been educated on how drugs can be properly used, with out abuse.
I would argue that there is a strong case to be made that despite this education, legal abuse of prescription drugs is prevalent. By legal, I mean that this abuse is facilitated by valid prescriptions.
lostfile401 wrote:Pot isn't a light drug, and it isn't harmless. The environment of addiction states that addicts ignore facts and common sense. They have a tendency to want to bring other people into their social circle, witch is just another system to reinforce their drug use. Witch explains why addict have a tendency to advocate that it's a harmless, and that their choice of drugs should be legal.
Not all advocates of legalization consider marijuana harmless. Not all advocates are addicts. There are sound arguments for legalization that do not depend upon a warped view of reality.
lostfile401 wrote: Pot also bonds to nerve endings and fat. This slows down the chemical and electrical reaction of the brain and nervous system. Any thing above a very mild use of pot one very couple of months is more then the body can handle. And the user is using the drug faster then the body can recover, causing a build up.
More than the body can handle relative to what? Eating junk food probably poses more serious long term health risks than using marijuana moderately throughout one's life.
lostfile401 wrote:Pot is also a powerful stimulant. It causes a permanent change in the brain after only a couple uses.
What sort of changes? The encoding of a long term memory is a permanent change. Many memories are with us from childhood until the grave.
lostfile401 wrote:Pot is also a powerful stimulant. It causes a permanent change in the brain after only a couple uses. While anti depressants take a year to cause any kind of permanent change in the brain. Considering we don't know exactly how this change effect the brain, that's pretty crazy.
We also don't fully understand the precise mechanisms and neurophysiological (or psychological) consequences of contemporary "brain medication". Causing a significantly increased amount of a given neurotransmitter to pool in a synapse is a remarkably crude intervention. I don't believe that we know the precise molecular mechanisms of these substances' effects. We are even more in the dark with regard to systemic consequences within the brain. One systemic consequence is that people tend to feel happier, however. There are a host of harmful side effects of these drugs, which cannot be ignored in any balanced analysis of various drugs, whether they be natural or synthetic. One such side effect is addiction. Many people have found themselves addicted to modern SSRI's (paxil being a name that comes to mind) even after a very brief encounter with them. This would seem to indicate a permanent (and harmful) change to the brain.