Having a q3w group would be kinda cool.
Who here will be playing Battlefield 2?
Who here will be playing Battlefield 2?
Myself and a couple buddies are going to play this game, I'm thinking of organizing a group of people to play with on a regular basis. Not a clan, as it would have no structure or hard commitments. Just a group of like minded people that want to be able to use team tactics in online play.
Having a q3w group would be kinda cool.
Having a q3w group would be kinda cool.
-
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
- Posts: 14376
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am
Re: Who here will be playing Battlefield 2?
Okay but I'm the co-leader.Cool Blue wrote:Myself and a couple buddies are going to play this game, I'm thinking of organizing a group of people to play with on a regular basis. Not a clan, as it would have no structure or hard commitments. Just a group of like minded people that want to be able to use team tactics in online play.
Having a q3w group would be kinda cool.
-
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
- Posts: 14376
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am
-
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
- Posts: 14376
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am
-
Freakaloin
- Posts: 10620
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am
I doubt I'll buy it. I never played the others, but it doesn't seem like my "cup of tea."
I don't see the appeal of having such a huge environment with so few people. Maybe if it had over 64 people it would work...but nobody's gonna host that kind of bandwidth/server power if a game is ever released that could actually work with that.
I don't see the appeal of having such a huge environment with so few people. Maybe if it had over 64 people it would work...but nobody's gonna host that kind of bandwidth/server power if a game is ever released that could actually work with that.
BF1 has plenty of 40+ servers and some 64player servers too. The high load/bandwith servers are usually the official ea servers or those hosted by game hosting companies. I prefer 32 anyway, any bigger and it turns into a madhouse.Psyche911 wrote:I doubt I'll buy it. I never played the others, but it doesn't seem like my "cup of tea."
I don't see the appeal of having such a huge environment with so few people. Maybe if it had over 64 people it would work...but nobody's gonna host that kind of bandwidth/server power if a game is ever released that could actually work with that.
I hope its not true but the rumour I heard was that the server software would have limited fuctionality unless it was running on a rented EA gameserver.
This BF2 video is awesome http://files.filefront.com/bf2_op_high/ ... einfo.html
This BF2 video is awesome http://files.filefront.com/bf2_op_high/ ... einfo.html
[img]http://www.subliminaldissonance.com/popehat.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.subliminaldissonance.com/images/smilies/nothing.jpg[/img]
i doubt it..unless you are talking about the ranking system. Only official servers will be connected to the ranking system..for obvious abuse reasons.Canidae wrote:I hope its not true but the rumour I heard was that the server software would have limited fuctionality unless it was running on a rented EA gameserver.![]()
This BF2 video is awesome http://files.filefront.com/bf2_op_high/ ... einfo.html
-
reefsurfer
- Posts: 4065
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:00 am
EA is always struggling to get as many buyers as possible for their games... i bet that BF2 is VERY optimized and they have made sure that even older pc's can run it.Ryoki wrote:I'm still worried about how my PC is gonna handle this monster of a game
If you got a geforce4/ati 9800pro or later and atleast 512 ram i bet you can run it on lowest and 16 player servers flawless.
-
Nightshade
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
-
CrinklyArse
- Posts: 5493
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:57 am