Anyone going to watch the Indy 500 today?

Post by **SOAPboy** » Mon May 30, 2005 4:17 am

Nightshade wrote:Thanks THOAPboi, I had almost forgotten what a complete retard you are.

what can i say, i like it the way things were.. i dont like that kind of change..

if chicks want to drive, give them there own fucking cup to race for.

Post by **Nightshade** » Mon May 30, 2005 4:19 am

Oh christ, just shut up.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Mon May 30, 2005 4:20 am

SOAPboy wrote:
Nightshade wrote:Thanks THOAPboi, I had almost forgotten what a complete retard you are.
what can i say, i like it the way things were.. i dont like that kind of change..

if chicks want to drive, give them there own fucking cup to race for.

someone got beat by a girl during recess.

Post by **Nightshade** » Mon May 30, 2005 4:26 am

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
Nightshade wrote:Thanks THOAPboi, I had almost forgotten what a complete retard you are.
exactly.

on a REAL racing note, poor Kimi Raikkonen

Poor F1 for having to put up with these stupid fucking rules. GG to them on the tire tether, though. That worked like a champ and should be instituted in IRL and a lot of other racing leagues. Not NASCAR, though. I want as many of those fucking inbred retards taken out by flying debris as possible.

Post by **SOAPboy** » Mon May 30, 2005 4:38 am

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
SOAPboy wrote:
Nightshade wrote:Thanks THOAPboi, I had almost forgotten what a complete retard you are.
what can i say, i like it the way things were.. i dont like that kind of change..

if chicks want to drive, give them there own fucking cup to race for.
someone got beat by a girl during recess.

yeah thats it.. :icon22:

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Mon May 30, 2005 4:40 am

SOAPboy wrote:
Nightshade wrote:Thanks THOAPboi, I had almost forgotten what a complete retard you are.
what can i say, i like it the way things were.. i dont like that kind of change..

if chicks want to drive, give them there own fucking cup to race for.

lol

it's all about what soap wants

how dare they!?

Post by **Dave** » Mon May 30, 2005 4:45 am

The gender bias is strong in this thread

Post by **inolen** » Mon May 30, 2005 4:54 am

SOAPboy wrote:what can i say, i like it the way things were.. i dont like that kind of change..

if chicks want to drive, give them there own fucking cup to race for.

Why shouldn't the girls race with the guys? What's it matter to you? They aren't making any special exeptions for them.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Mon May 30, 2005 4:59 am

Nightshade wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
Nightshade wrote:Thanks THOAPboi, I had almost forgotten what a complete retard you are.
exactly.

on a REAL racing note, poor Kimi Raikkonen
Poor F1 for having to put up with these stupid fucking rules. GG to them on the tire tether, though. That worked like a champ and should be instituted in IRL and a lot of other racing leagues. Not NASCAR, though. I want as many of those fucking inbred retards taken out by flying debris as possible.

yeah, the tire tether is just one of those "why didn't they think of that sooner" type of idea.

i agree, some of the rules have gotten a bit ridiculous, but i'm glad they went to one qualifying session on Saturdays.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Mon May 30, 2005 4:59 am

inolen wrote:
SOAPboy wrote:what can i say, i like it the way things were.. i dont like that kind of change..

if chicks want to drive, give them there own fucking cup to race for.
Why shouldn't the girls race with the guys? What's it matter to you? They aren't making any special exeptions for them.

bad memories man. don't bring them up, he might snap.

Post by **SOAPboy** » Mon May 30, 2005 5:13 am

inolen wrote:
SOAPboy wrote:what can i say, i like it the way things were.. i dont like that kind of change..

if chicks want to drive, give them there own fucking cup to race for.
Why shouldn't the girls race with the guys? What's it matter to you? They aren't making any special exeptions for them.

No and i understand that, its just something thats always struck me oddly in any sport or event.. something that was "all male" suddenly gets changed because some chick says "OMG I CAN DO (Insert sport/event here) TOO! LEMME TRY!"..

dunno.. just something thats always bothered me..

Post by **Dave** » Mon May 30, 2005 5:39 am

You're a jerk.. get with the times

Post by **SOAPboy** » Mon May 30, 2005 5:49 am

Dave wrote:You're a jerk.. get with the times

People keep saying "get with the times" but i fail to see the logic in it.. i dont like huge change like that.. and never will..

Post by **Dave** » Mon May 30, 2005 5:59 am

So I take it you like your women subservient without individual thought and opportunity

Post by **SOAPboy** » Mon May 30, 2005 6:06 am

Dave wrote:So I take it you like your women subservient without individual thought and opportunity

Nope.. have no problem with any of that.. remember im not 60 here i grew up with a single parent mom.. so yeah, opportunity and such is fine, its just the sports thing that gets me..

Post by **Dave** » Mon May 30, 2005 6:08 am

That's the dumbest thing I ever heard

Post by **SOAPboy** » Mon May 30, 2005 6:20 am

Dave wrote:That's the dumbest thing I ever heard

and your prolly right, its just how i feel..

Post by **tnf** » Mon May 30, 2005 6:31 am

SOAPboy wrote:
inolen wrote:
SOAPboy wrote:what can i say, i like it the way things were.. i dont like that kind of change..

if chicks want to drive, give them there own fucking cup to race for.
Why shouldn't the girls race with the guys? What's it matter to you? They aren't making any special exeptions for them.
No and i understand that, its just something thats always struck me oddly in any sport or event.. something that was "all male" suddenly gets changed because some chick says "OMG I CAN DO (Insert sport/event here) TOO! LEMME TRY!"..

dunno.. just something thats always bothered me..

Could see your point if she was getting in without legitimately qualifying simply because she was a woman, but car racing is one of those sports where women might actually have a legitimate physical advantage over their male competitors (being lighter). She was legit all the way. I have no problem with women trying the men's sports so long as nothing is changed for them, and they aren't taking the place of a more qualified male (for example - let's say that this chick was given a special exemption to get into the race instead of really qualifying, and in doing so , she was getting a position that people who had been working their asses off to get might have). Kind of like when Anika Sorenstam got into a men's tournament with a sponsor's exemption. If she wants to play with the men on the men's tour to prove she can, then she should do it full time...none of this play on the women's tour 99% of the time and then get sponsor's exemptions to get into big tournaments.

So, the bottom line - this is no big deal. Racing is not a male or female sport so far as I can see it. Why should she be denied the chance to compete if she is that good?

Don't take out the aggression you still harbor for being picked after girls for sports teams back in grade school on women athletes today (at least those who are earning everything they get.)

Post by **SOAPboy** » Mon May 30, 2005 6:42 am

tnf that post was good, until you decided to start flaming..

you slowly lose my respect with each post like that..

again, its just my view, be it wrong or right..

Post by **Grudge** » Mon May 30, 2005 7:20 am

That Annika Sörenstam thing was just a publicity stunt.

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Mon May 30, 2005 7:22 am

Grudge wrote:That Annika Sörenstam thing was just a publicity stunt.

as was my thing with Annika

(i'm trying to make someone jealous)

Post by **tnf** » Mon May 30, 2005 7:54 am

SOAPboy wrote:tnf that post was good, until you decided to start flaming..

you slowly lose my respect with each post like that..

again, its just my view, be it wrong or right..

You hit a nerve with your 'i'm glad the bitch lost..whore' comment at the start of this whole thing.

You have my apologies if you didn't appreciate the jab, but, to be 100% honest, your initial comments made me think that you were harboring resentment from a situation like that in your past...making that not a flame, but an observation.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Mon May 30, 2005 11:04 am

Dave wrote:So I take it you like your women subservient without individual thought and opportunity

you say that like he's had women.

Post by **Dave** » Mon May 30, 2005 6:56 pm

oh snap

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon May 30, 2005 7:05 pm

SOAPboy wrote:tnf that post was good, until you decided to start flaming..

you slowly lose my respect with each post like that..

again, its just my view, be it wrong or right..

So you're an ignorant sexist and you're fine with thinking women are concidered less than men?