Created in mspaint - holy shit

Post by **[xeno]Julios** » Tue May 24, 2005 6:20 am

http://www.deviantart.com/view/17908194/

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Tue May 24, 2005 6:22 am

that's MORE than impressive. too bad it doesn't come in a bigger res :\

Post by **[xeno]Julios** » Tue May 24, 2005 6:23 am

some progress shots:

http://www.deviantart.com/view/18113283/

http://www.deviantart.com/view/18178536/

Post by **eepberries** » Tue May 24, 2005 6:34 am

What the fuuuuck...

Post by **SOAPboy** » Tue May 24, 2005 6:37 am

amazing

Post by **shaft** » Tue May 24, 2005 8:15 am

500hrs?
Thats 40 days at 12hrs a day to paint a fucking picture.
This guy has more time to waste then Soapboy.

Post by **Grudge** » Tue May 24, 2005 8:49 am

omg, why? what a fucking waste of time

Post by **FragaGeddon** » Tue May 24, 2005 8:52 am

Post by **iambowelfish** » Tue May 24, 2005 9:40 am

Why'd they have to go and spoil it by putting it through Photoshop?

It is tainted, and is not pure MSPaint.

Post by **Pext** » Tue May 24, 2005 10:29 am

lol... in these 500h some guys could learn to throw out images of similiar quality at 2h each.

Post by **mjrpes** » Tue May 24, 2005 11:10 am

shaft wrote:500hrs?
Thats 40 days at 12hrs a day to paint a fucking picture.
This guy has more time to waste then Soapboy.

I didn't get that. On the first draft he says he spent 8 hours drawing what looks like a good half of the picture. So it took another 492 hours to finish the rest of it?

Post by **YourGrandpa** » Tue May 24, 2005 11:12 am

The guy could have went to college, became a doctor, made millions of dollars and paid some idiot to spend 500hrs painting stupid pictures.

Post by **brisk** » Tue May 24, 2005 11:18 am

Impressive, but ultimately pointless.

Post by **brisk** » Tue May 24, 2005 11:22 am

Just like these. Apparently created entirely within illustrator. Technically superb, but considering the ammount of time it took to produce them, you could be far more productive doing something else...

Its a bit like that photorealism art movement. Initially pleasing, but ultimately totally lacking in substance. At the end of the day, it is what it is.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Tue May 24, 2005 2:14 pm

:lol: @ you fags talking about being "productive". i bet you spent at LEAST that much time in front of the television last year.

Post by **Survivor** » Tue May 24, 2005 2:17 pm

+JuggerNaut+ wrote::lol: @ you fags talking about being "productive". i bet you spent at LEAST that much time in front of the television last year.

Not tv, pc.

Post by **diego** » Tue May 24, 2005 2:22 pm

YourGrandpa wrote:The guy could have went to college, became a doctor, made millions of dollars and paid some idiot to spend 500hrs painting stupid pictures.

Just like you did.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Tue May 24, 2005 2:22 pm

Survivor wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote::lol: @ you fags talking about being "productive". i bet you spent at LEAST that much time in front of the television last year.
Not tv, pc.

by whichever means you watch tv shows, it's the same. equating to approximately 1.36 hours a day, most of you fags waste 500+ hours a year watching tv. productive :lol:

Post by **Billy Bellend** » Tue May 24, 2005 2:23 pm

it looks nice

if it was comercial art i'd pick it apart :P

but you kinda say its not comercial and i believe you, based on the jules im familyar with.

so i say very nice

Post by **diego** » Tue May 24, 2005 2:23 pm

on topic: I think that's amazing. Nothing I would ever spend my time on, but simply amazing nonetheless. Reminds me of early Impressionists.

Post by **[xeno]Julios** » Tue May 24, 2005 3:29 pm

brisk wrote:Just like these. Apparently created entirely within illustrator. Technically superb, but considering the ammount of time it took to produce them, you could be far more productive doing something else...

Its a bit like that photorealism art movement. Initially pleasing, but ultimately totally lacking in substance. At the end of the day, it is what it is.

Brisk...

wtf...

those pics you linked aren't photographs???

WTF

Post by **[xeno]Julios** » Tue May 24, 2005 3:31 pm

um holy shit!!

http://homepage3.nifty.com/highside/gallery.htm

more photorealistic illustrator stuff

HOW?!?

Post by **[xeno]Julios** » Tue May 24, 2005 3:32 pm

Billy Bellend wrote:
but you kinda say its not comercial and i believe you, based on the jules im familyar with.

i can't vouch for the authenticity - but the ppl at deviantart seem to buy it...

Post by **AmIdYfReAk** » Tue May 24, 2005 3:33 pm

and i bet they are all like toxic, young, Dumb, and will beleve anything as long as you use some caps in the sentance.

Post by **bitWISE** » Tue May 24, 2005 4:18 pm

Thats pretty kickass.

And wtf is up with the illustrator pics? Are they just altered or were they drawn completely by hand?