If unicorns don't exist...

Post by **seremtan** » Tue May 24, 2005 2:33 pm

...how can they have horns?

Post by **FlamingTP** » Tue May 24, 2005 2:44 pm

they dont moron.

Post by **seremtan** » Tue May 24, 2005 4:54 pm

Looks like the

is catching.

Post by **Survivor** » Tue May 24, 2005 4:55 pm

seremtan wrote:...how can they have horns?

If unicorns don't exist then their horns don't exist. Since they both don't exist a unicorn can have a horn.

Post by **FlamingTP** » Tue May 24, 2005 5:08 pm

How can it have a horn if it doesn't exist oh wise one?

Post by **Survivor** » Tue May 24, 2005 5:09 pm

Because the horn doesn't exist either

Post by **seremtan** » Tue May 24, 2005 9:38 pm

FlamingTP wrote:How can it have a horn if it doesn't exist oh wise one?

That was my original question, kohai

Post by **seremtan** » Tue May 24, 2005 9:44 pm

Survivor wrote:
seremtan wrote:...how can they have horns?
If unicorns don't exist then their horns don't exist. Since they both don't exist a unicorn can have a horn.

Exactly. A non-existent thing can have any property, so long as it's logically possible. Paul Atreides can be the kwisatz haderach. Frodo can have pointy ears. Duke's girlfriend can have a third nipple. And so on.

Believe it or not this was a question in an old Oxford entrance exam paper.

Post by **FlamingTP** » Tue May 24, 2005 9:47 pm

wonderful grammar there Mr. Oxford. :lol:

Post by **losCHUNK** » Tue May 24, 2005 10:41 pm

and there was me thinking this was qwfix and not the dictionary

ffs if your gunna use grammar flames atleast do it somewhere that may actually give 2 shits about it

Keep It Real · Post by **Keep It Real** » Wed May 25, 2005 5:49 am

losCHUNK wrote:and there was me thinking this was qwfix and not the dictionary

ffs if your gunna use grammar flames atleast do it somewhere that may actually give 2 shits about it

this forum has a pm function

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Wed May 25, 2005 6:36 am

let's start another tower!

Post by **phantasmagoria** » Wed May 25, 2005 8:27 am

Post by **seremtan** » Wed May 25, 2005 9:13 am

FlamingTP wrote:wonderful grammar there Mr. Oxford. :lol:

Don't start your

on me, chump.

Post by **seremtan** » Wed May 25, 2005 9:14 am

Keep It Real wrote:
losCHUNK wrote:and there was me thinking this was qwfix and not the dictionary

ffs if your gunna use grammar flames atleast do it somewhere that may actually give 2 shits about it
this forum has a pm function

If I get grammar flames from Duke via PM I'm coming over there...

Post by **Survivor** » Wed May 25, 2005 1:15 pm

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:let's start another tower!

wtf

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Wed May 25, 2005 1:46 pm

FlamingTP wrote:wonderful grammar there Mr. Oxford. :lol:

His grammar is consistently better than yours dumbdumb.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Wed May 25, 2005 5:19 pm

phantasmagoria wrote:old!

oh, i know, right? :icon31:

Post by **FlamingTP** » Wed May 25, 2005 5:45 pm

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:
FlamingTP wrote:wonderful grammar there Mr. Oxford. :lol:
His grammar is consistently better than yours dumbdumb.

it's dumb-dumb moron. :lol:

Post by **Fjoggs** » Wed May 25, 2005 5:49 pm

oh christ.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Wed May 25, 2005 6:08 pm

FlamingTP wrote:
HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:
FlamingTP wrote:wonderful grammar there Mr. Oxford. :lol:
His grammar is consistently better than yours dumbdumb.
it's dumb-dumb moron. :lol:

:lol: you sure are, mate :lol:

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Wed May 25, 2005 6:09 pm

Fjoggs wrote:oh christ.

Post by **seremtan** » Wed May 25, 2005 7:49 pm

FlamingTP wrote:
HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:
FlamingTP wrote:wonderful grammar there Mr. Oxford. :lol:
His grammar is consistently better than yours dumbdumb.
it's dumb-dumb moron. :lol:

Actually it's dum-dum, or in your case

-:dork:

If unicorns don't exist...

If unicorns don't exist...

Re: If unicorns don't exist...

Re: If unicorns don't exist...