CAMERA Pro

Post by **Doombrain** » Mon May 23, 2005 5:41 pm

ToxicBug wrote:Damn I didn't know Kodak put digital backs into Canon SLR bodies.

they don't anymore, it's old.

Pete. you'll need to spend the money or you'll end up with a second best.

Post by **prince1000** » Mon May 23, 2005 5:42 pm

that eos 1 prolly cost close to 10grand in like 97-98

Post by **prince1000** » Mon May 23, 2005 5:44 pm

Doombrain wrote:
ToxicBug wrote:Damn I didn't know Kodak put digital backs into Canon SLR bodies.
they don't anymore, it's old.

Pete. you'll need to spend the money or you'll end up with a second best.

i really know nothing about digital but SLR 35mm, canon or nikon only option, or contax (w/zeiss lenses) but they're pretty specialised, like leica in the rangefinder market.

Post by **Doombrain** » Mon May 23, 2005 5:45 pm

pete wrote:Good day my friends.
Thanks for your participation.

I was wondering if I should consider the price of the lens also because of the difference in price from brands. I don't think that a Konica is as expensive as a Canon or a Nikon.
What do you think?

Minolta Konica Maxxum 7D.

Thanks
Pete

Same here as well. Again, you'll need to put up the cash to get the result

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon May 23, 2005 6:45 pm

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/kodakdcs520/

Price (£9,995 without PC card or lens but including one battery.)

Not only Canon but Nikon also with Kodak.
They weight around 3.5 pounds without the battery.

USD29,995 list price DCS-560.

Pete