some new Serious Sam 2 media

Post by **MKJ** » Wed May 18, 2005 3:42 pm

nothing moving yet, though

but, the light of fortune shines upon me; they held on to the wacky xbox hud :icon14:

[lvlshot]http://www.gamer.nl/images/content/JaapvanNes/200505/1116429851_6.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://www.gamer.nl/images/content/JaapvanNes/200505/1116429851_4.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://www.gamer.nl/images/content/JaapvanNes/200505/1116429851_0.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://www.gamer.nl/images/content/JaapvanNes/200505/1116429851_1.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://www.gamer.nl/images/content/JaapvanNes/200505/1116429851_2.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://www.gamer.nl/images/content/JaapvanNes/200505/1116429851_3.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://www.gamer.nl/images/content/JaapvanNes/200505/1116429851_5.jpg[/lvlshot]

Post by **Magnetichead** » Wed May 18, 2005 3:50 pm

Fan fucking tastic. I can't wait to get my hands on this.

Post by **o'dium** » Wed May 18, 2005 3:54 pm

Its a shame its e3... After looking at games with more detail in a hand that in those entire pics, its kinda spoilt it a tad more...

Post by **Magnetichead** » Wed May 18, 2005 4:18 pm

Yeah but you know how the sam man is odium.

it might not have the best graphics but I doubt any of the eye bleeders can cope with a hundred or so enemies on screen in huge never ending levels.

Post by **o'dium** » Wed May 18, 2005 4:19 pm

Magnetichead wrote:Yeah but you know how the sam man is odium.

it might not have the best graphics but I doubt any of the eye bleeders can cope with a hundred or so enemies on screen in huge never ending levels.

I know, thats its only saving grace. I have SS here and i still play it. Ugly as sin, but nothing beats THAT MANY enemies screaming at you.

Post by **Magnetichead** » Wed May 18, 2005 4:22 pm

Don't forget the co-op mate. Mmmmmm.

Post by **R00k** » Wed May 18, 2005 4:26 pm

Hell yea, this looks like it's going to be just as fun as the first one. :icon14:

Post by **Magnetichead** » Wed May 18, 2005 4:27 pm

LOOK MA! I'M A LUMBERJACK

Post by **R00k** » Wed May 18, 2005 4:28 pm

o'dium wrote:Its a shame its e3... After looking at games with more detail in a hand that in those entire pics, its kinda spoilt it a tad more...

Man, what is it with you and graphics levels? I know you do texture work, but there is no reason to hold every game to the yardstick of graphical perfection you have in your head.

The original game had nothing to do with graphical greatness, why does this one have to?

Post by **Magnetichead** » Wed May 18, 2005 4:31 pm

Because it's how he is.

Post by **o'dium** » Wed May 18, 2005 4:33 pm

R00k wrote:
o'dium wrote:Its a shame its e3... After looking at games with more detail in a hand that in those entire pics, its kinda spoilt it a tad more...
Man, what is it with you and graphics levels? I know you do texture work, but there is no reason to hold every game to the yardstick of graphical perfection you have in your head.

The original game had nothing to do with graphical greatness, why does this one have to?

It was a general observation. I thank you for forcing yourself to read every post i make, it means a lot to me.

Post by **Magnetichead** » Wed May 18, 2005 4:36 pm

He needs his fix, what's the guy surposed to do?

Post by **R00k** » Wed May 18, 2005 5:10 pm

o'dium wrote:
R00k wrote:
o'dium wrote:Its a shame its e3... After looking at games with more detail in a hand that in those entire pics, its kinda spoilt it a tad more...
Man, what is it with you and graphics levels? I know you do texture work, but there is no reason to hold every game to the yardstick of graphical perfection you have in your head.

The original game had nothing to do with graphical greatness, why does this one have to?
It was a general observation. I thank you for forcing yourself to read every post i make, it means a lot to me.

I normally read every post in every thread I post in myself. It's called a discussion.

No need to get defensive, it was an honest question.

Post by **-SKID-** » Wed May 18, 2005 6:04 pm

http://media.xbox.ign.com/media/669/669999/vids_1.html

Some moving media. Also, it doesnt have a crosshair or hud, and the guy playing knows just where to shoot the enemies. So its probably not an ingame real time demo. :icon32:

Post by **Grudge** » Wed May 18, 2005 6:28 pm

looks liek a shitload of fun

Post by **Magnetichead** » Wed May 18, 2005 6:32 pm

It's even more beautiful in motion. *sniff*

Post by **Don Carlos** » Wed May 18, 2005 7:49 pm

AWESOME

Cant wait for it...looks good too

Post by **saturn** » Wed May 18, 2005 9:21 pm

R00k wrote:
o'dium wrote:
R00k wrote: Man, what is it with you and graphics levels? I know you do texture work, but there is no reason to hold every game to the yardstick of graphical perfection you have in your head.

The original game had nothing to do with graphical greatness, why does this one have to?
It was a general observation. I thank you for forcing yourself to read every post i make, it means a lot to me.
I normally read every post in every thread I post in myself. It's called a discussion.

No need to get defensive, it was an honest question.

He's a cunt

Post by **Magnetichead** » Wed May 18, 2005 10:00 pm

When this is out are we going to get some Q3W co-op going?

Post by **Zyte -_-** » Wed May 18, 2005 10:04 pm

ow man i loved that fucking cannonball thingy in #1.

Post by **SplishSplash** » Thu May 19, 2005 9:26 am

Actually, I liked the graphics in the first one.

Those egyptian buildings looked really amazing at the time.

Post by **MaCaBr3** » Thu May 19, 2005 12:53 pm

Serious Sam: even if the graphics aren't mind blowing, everyone will buy the game just because IT'S SO DAMN FUN.

Post by **MKJ** » Fri May 20, 2005 8:03 am

:S why does everything he shoots explode :S